Technical Papers
Feb 2, 2022

A Framework for Assessing Maturity and Readiness Towards Industrialized Construction

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 2

Abstract

Industrialized construction has garnered attention in the construction industry owing to the economic benefits resulting from the reduction in time of project delivery, the enhancement of quality control, and an increase in labor productivity. The adoption of industrialized construction might require a change in the business processes and delivery methods. These changes are often costly and could be unsuccessful without careful instruction. The objective of this study is to provide a practical framework for shifting the operational model from conventional construction to industrialized construction. A structured case survey was designed to collect data from companies with high utilization of offsite strategies. The results were used to design a maturity framework for adopting industrialized construction technology. The proposed framework evaluates industrialized construction capability in technological, functional, and organizational components, and provides strategies to improve the technology adoptions in four stages of explore, initiate, control, and optimize. The outcome of this study addresses the problem of immature process models in construction companies and facilitates the employment of industrialized construction practices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Antoniades, P. 2014. SOA maturity model: A Delphi-derived proposal for inter-enterprise setups. Berlin, HL: Springer.
Brandl, D. 2016. “Mesa mom capability maturity model version 1.0.” White Paper 53.
Cowles, E., and P. Warner. 2013. Prefabrication and modularization in construction. Raleigh, NC: FMI Corporation.
DDA (Dodge Data & Analytics). 2020. Prefabrication and modular construction smartmarket report 2020. Hamilton, NJ: DDA.
de Carolis, A., M. Macchi, E. Negri, and S. Terzi. 2017. “A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies.” In Proc., IFIP Int. Conf. on Advances in Production Management Systems, 13–20. Berlin, HL: Springer.
Dul, J., and T. Hak. 2007. Case study methodology in business research. London: Routledge.
Dumas, C., and R. H. Beinecke. 2018. “Change leadership in the 21st century.” J. Organ. Change Manage. 31 (4): 867–876. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2017-0042.
Goncalves Filho, A. P., J. C. S. Andrade, and M. M. de Oliveira Marinho. 2010. “A safety culture maturity model for petrochemical companies in Brazil.” Saf. Sci. 48 (5): 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.012.
Jung, K., B. Kulvatunyou, S. Choi, and M. P. Brundage. 2016. “An overview of a smart manufacturing system readiness assessment.” In Proc., IFIP Int. Conf. on Advances in Production Management Systems, 705–712. Berlin, HL: Springer.
Larsson, R. 1993. “Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies.” Acad. Manage. J. 36 (6): 1515–1546.
Lessing, J., and S. Brege. 2018. “Industrialized building companies’ business models: Multiple case study of Swedish and north American companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 05017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001368.
Li, L., Z. Li, X. Li, S. Zhang, and X. Luo. 2020. “A new framework of industrialized construction in China: Towards on-site industrialization.” J. Cleaner Prod. 244 (1): 118469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118469.
Liang, C., W. Lu, S. Rowlinson, and X. Zhang. 2016. “Development of a multifunctional BIM maturity model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (11): 06016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001186.
MGH (McGraw Hill Construction). 2011. Prefabrication and modularization: Increasing productivity in the construction industry. New York: McGraw Hill Construction.
Pan, W., A. G. Gibb, and A. R. Dainty. 2007. “Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of off-site modern methods of construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 25 (2): 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600827058.
Qi, B., M. Razkenari, J. Li, A. Costin, C. Kibert, and S. Qian. 2020. “Investigating US industry practitioners’ perspectives towards the adoption of emerging technologies in industrialized construction.” Buildings 10 (5): 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10050085.
Razkenari, M., Q. Bing, A. Fenner, H. Hakim, A. Costin, and C. J. Kibert. 2019. “Industrialized construction: Emerging methods and technologies.” In Computing in civil engineering 2019: Data, sensing, and analytics, 352–359. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Razkenari, M., A. Fenner, A. Shojaei, H. Hakim, and C. Kibert. 2020. “Perceptions of offsite construction in the United States: An investigation of current practices.” J. Build. Eng. 29 (1–2): 101138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101138.
Sadoughi, A., J. A. Morefield, M. A. Razkenari, and C. J. Kibert. 2020. “The role of architects in design-manufacturing-build of building industry: A case study.” In Construction research congress 2020: Project management and controls, materials, and contracts, 1358–1365. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Schuh, G., R. Anderl, J. Gausemeier, M. Ten Hompel, and W. Wahlster. 2017. Industrie 4.0 maturity index: Managing the digital transformation of companies. Munich, Germany: Herbert Utz.
Schumacher, A., S. Erol, and W. Sihn. 2016. “A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises.” Procedia CIRP 52 (4): 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040.
Smith, R. E., and T. Rice. 2015. Permanent modular construction: Construction performance. Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.29173/mocs172.
Tam, V. W., C. M. Tam, S. Zeng, and W. C. Ng. 2007. “Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction.” Build. Environ. 42 (10): 3642–3654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003.
Velamati, S. 2012. “Feasibility, benefits and challenges of modular construction in high-rise development in the United States: A developer’s perspective.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Real Estate.
Wuni, I. Y., and G. Q. Shen. 2020. “Critical success factors for modular integrated construction projects: A review.” Build. Res. Inf. 48 (7): 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1669009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 28Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Jun 18, 2021
Accepted: Dec 3, 2021
Published online: Feb 2, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 2, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Sustainable Resources Management, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State Univ. of New York, Syracuse, NY 13210. (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-7570. Email: [email protected]
Charles J. Kibert [email protected]
Professor, M. E. Rinker, Sr. School of Construction Management, College of Design, Construction, and Planning, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Construction 4.0 Technologies and Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12122206, 12, 12, (2206), (2022).
  • Developing a readiness model and a self-assessment tool for adopting digital technologies in construction organizations, Building Research & Information, 10.1080/09613218.2022.2136130, (1-16), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share