Abstract

Green and sustainable initiatives are among the most noticeable practices in today’s design and construction applications. While allocation of contractual obligations under traditional building projects is known to the associated stakeholders, constructing green and sustainable buildings adds new considerations that should be understood by the different project participants. No previous research work has attempted to provide in-depth analysis of how risks and responsibilities should be contractually allocated among the different project participants in green and sustainable buildings. As such, this paper addresses this critical knowledge gap using a research methodology that is based on the dual interrelated analysis of case studies and standard contract forms. On one hand, investigation of previous projects showed that the major areas of concern in relation to the contractual problems associated with green buildings include: governing terms and conditions, certification and documentation, sustainability considerations and requirements, and materials and specifications. On the other hand, critical examination of existing standard forms of contract (i.e., ConsensusDocs 310-2011: Green Building Addendum, and the American Institute of Architects (AIA) E204-2017: Sustainable Projects Exhibit) indicate that: (1) while ConsensusDocs creates a new role within green and sustainable buildings known as “green building facilitator” (GBF) who is assigned most risks and responsibilities, AIA indicates that the architect is the project party who possesses these key roles during the design and construction phases; (2) each project party shall be responsible for its own roles in achieving and maintaining the green and sustainable aspects; (3) careful front-end and early planning of the different green and sustainable aspects is crucial to achieve the targeted and elected green and sustainable goals; and (4) collaboration between the different parties is highly crucial in attaining the building’s green and sustainable objectives. Consequently, the paper offers contractual synopsis of the risks and responsibilities that are unique to green and sustainable buildings, the proper action that should be allocated for each risk and/or responsibility, and the project participant that is best positioned to bear such risk and/or responsibility. Further, the paper presents contractual recommendations, in the form of checklist questions, to provide profound understanding of the general principles and provisions associated with green and sustainable buildings. Ultimately, this study adds to the body of knowledge by honing and strengthening the education and awareness of the different project parties in relation to the contractual aspects of green and sustainable buildings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdul-Malak, M. A. U., and F. G. Khalife. 2020. “Managing the risks of third-party sustainability certification failures.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (3): 04520027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000407.
Abotaleb, I. S., and I. H. El-adaway. 2017. “Administering employers’ payment obligations under national and international design–build standard forms of contract.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (2): 04517003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000213.
Aggarwal, P., and A. Kadyan. 2011. “Greenwashing: The darker side of CSR.” Indian J. Appl. Res. 4 (3): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/MAR2014/20.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2017. AIA document E204: Sustainable projects exhibit. Washington, DC: AIA.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2020a. AIA document D503: Guide for sustainable projects. Washington, DC: AIA.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2020b. “E204-2017 Sustainable projects exhibit.” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://www.aiacontracts.org/contract-documents/25161-sustainable-projects-exhibit.
Architizer. 2020. “5 Ways AIA’s latest document will help sustainable projects.” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://architizer.com/blog/inspiration/industry/aia-docs-sustainable/.
Assaad, R., and M. A. Abdul-Malak. 2020a. “Timing of liquidated damages recovery and related liability issues.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000390.
Assaad, R., and M. A. Abdul-Malak. 2020b. “Legal perspective on treatment of delay liquidated damages and penalty clauses by different jurisdictions: Comparative analysis.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000387.
Assaad, R., and I. H. El-Adaway. 2020. “Enhancing the knowledge of construction business failure: A social network analysis approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (6): 04020052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001831.
Assaad, R., I. H. El-Adaway, and I. S. Abotaleb. 2020. “Predicting project performance in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (5): 04020030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001797.
Babaeian Jelodar, M., M. S. Jaafar, and T. W. Yiu. 2013. “In search of sustainability: Constructability application and contract management in Malaysian industrialized building systems.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 5 (4): 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000121.
Bain v. Vertex Architects, LLC., No. 2010L012695 (Cook County, IL 2010), WL 4805760 (Ill.Cir.).
Cheatham, C. 2009. “What does a green building contract look like?” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://www.greenbuildinglawupdate.com/2009/12/articles/legal-developments/what-does-a-green-building-contract-look-like/.
Cheung, S. O., and T. W. Yiu. 2006. “Are construction disputes inevitable?” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 53 (3): 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.877445.
Colin, J., D. Langford, and P. Kennedy. 1996. “The relationship between construction procurement strategies and construction contract conflicts.” In Proc., CIB W-92 Procurement Symp. Hong Kong: Univ. of Hong Kong.
ConsensusDocs. 2011. Green building addendum. ConsensusDocs 310. Arlington, VA: ConsensusDocs.
ConsensusDocs. 2019. “ConsensusDocs guidebook.” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://www.consensusdocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/All-Associations-Guidebook-July-2019.pdf.
ConsensusDocs. 2020a. “300 Series: Collaborative.” Accessed September 7, 2020. https://www.consensusdocs.org/contract/310-2/.
ConsensusDocs. 2020b. “New standard document facilitates green building projects.” Accessed May 21, 2020. www.consensusdocs.org/new-standard-document-facilitates-green-building-projects/.
Delmas, M. A., and V. C. Burbano. 2011. “The drivers of greenwashing.” Calif. Manage. Rev. 54 (1): 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64.
El-adaway, I. H., I. S. Abotaleb, R. J. Mohler, J. Sheffler, H. Fuller, and C. Orozco. 2019. “Contractual implications of environmental compliance requirements in construction projects.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 05019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000302.
Ferme, L., J. Zuo, and R. Rameezdeen. 2018. “Improving collaboration among stakeholders in green building projects: Role of early contractor involvement.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (4): 04518020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000278.
Gidumal v. Site 16/17 Development. LLC. N.Y. Slip Op 70243 (App. Term 2012).
Goh, C. S., L. Jack, and A. Bajracharya. 2020. “Qualitative study of sustainability policies and guidelines in the built environment.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000395.
Goh, C. S., and S. Rowlinson. 2013. “Conceptual maturity model for sustainable construction.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 5 (4): 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000129.
Kaplow, S. 2015. “The first green building litigation. The rest of the story.” Accessed June 7, 2020. https://www.greenbuildinglawupdate.com/2015/07/articles/leed/the-first-green-building-litigation-the-rest-of-the-story/.
Kaplow, S. 2016a. “Now is the time to revise your green building contracts.” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://www.greenbuildinglawupdate.com/2016/04/articles/leed/now-is-the-time-to-revise-your-green-building-contracts/.
Kaplow, S. 2016b. “Less than 20% of green building contracts properly drafted.” Accessed May 25, 2020. https://www.greenbuildinglawupdate.com/2016/10/articles/green-building/less-than-20-of-green-building-contracts-properly-drafted/.
Kaplow, S. 2017. “New sustainable projects exhibit in 2017 AIA contract documents.” Accessed May 25, 2020. https://www.greenbuildinglawupdate.com/2017/05/articles/green-building/new-sustainable-projects-exhibit-in-2017-aia-contract-documents/.
Koger, M. 2017. “A decade of sustainability: How AIA contract documents have evolved.” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://www.aia.org/articles/87801-a-decade-of-sustainability-how-aia-contract-.
Leone, J. 2009. “ConsensusDOCS releases “green” contract addendum.” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://dsvlaw.com/consensusdocs-releases-green-contract-addendum/.
Luken, E. 2015. “Allocating responsibility and risk in contracts for sustainable projects.” Accessed May 21, 2020. https://www.usgbc.org/education/sessions/allocating-responsibility-and-risk-contracts-sustainable-projects-9899677.
McAree, M., and G. Davidian. 2019. “Greenbiz and getting to market: What it takes to go green and limit liability.” Accessed September 7, 2020. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/tort_trial_insurance_practice/publications/the_brief/2016_17/winter/greenbiz_and_getting_to_market_what_it_takes_to_go_green_and_limit_liability/.
New Paltz. 2016. “College and community join to cut ribbon at reopened Wooster Hall.” Accessed September 8, 2020. https://sites.newpaltz.edu/news/2016/09/college-and-community-join-to-cut-ribbon-at-reopened-wooster-hall/.
New Paltz. 2018. “Certified sustainable: Wooster and Bevier renovations earn LEED gold ratings.” Accessed September 8, 2020. https://sites.newpaltz.edu/news/2018/12/certified-sustainable-wooster-and-bevier-renovations-earn-leed-gold-ratings/.
Perkins, M. 2009. “Green building risks: Contractors must monitor green contracts.” Accessed September 8, 2020. https://www.wtplaw.com/siteFiles/news/green_building_risks_contractors_must_monitor_green_contract_2.pdf.
Robichaud, L. B., and V. S. Anantatmula. 2011. “Greening project management practices for sustainable construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (1): 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000030.
Sinha, A. K., and K. Neeraj Jha. 2020. “Environmental laws and their compliance in road projects.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000354.
Southern Builders, Inc. v. Shaw Development, LLC (MD Cir. Ct. 2007). Case no. 19-C-07-011405.
Tanielian, A. R. 2014. “Balancing harmful impacts of the petroleum industry with internal dispute prevention and external sustainable development initiatives.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 6 (2): 03013003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000138.
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Weyerhaeuser Company, No. 11-CV-00047 (U.S. District Court 2011).
The Free Dictionary. 2020. “Breach of warranty.” Accessed September 7, 2020. https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Breach+of+Warranty.
US Green Building Council. 2006a. “Building a greener future: Special advertising section in partnership with Fortune.” Fortune March 20, 2006.
U.S. Green Building Council. 2006b. “Project profile: Fossil Ridge High School, Fort Collins, Colorado.” Accessed September 8, 2020. https://s3.amazonaws.com/legacy.usgbc.org/usgbc/docs/Archive/General/Docs3940.pdf.
U.S. Green Building Council. 2020. “Case study: Lucile packard children’s hospital Stanford.” Accessed September 8, 2020. https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Lucile%20Packard_Case%20Study_January2020_2.pdf.
Waldron, B. D. 2006. Scope for improvement: A survey of pressure points in Australian construction and infrastructure projects. Australian Constructors Association. Sydney, Australia: Blake Dawson Waldron.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Jun 30, 2020
Accepted: Nov 2, 2020
Published online: Jan 29, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 29, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rayan Assaad, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
Hurst-McCarthy Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Professor of Civil Engineering, and Founding Director of Missouri Consortium for Construction Innovation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering/Dept. of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-6380. Email: [email protected]
Keegan Baxmeyer [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
Mikala Harman [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
Hannah Lashley [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Price Escalation in Construction Projects: Examining National and International Contracts, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13918, 150, 9, (2024).
  • A Contractual Approach to Resolving Disputes Arising from Failure to Achieve Green Certification, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.003, (20-30), (2024).
  • A Life Cycle Risk Management Framework for Green Building Project Stakeholders, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5361, 39, 4, (2023).
  • Theorizing the path dependencies and hierarchical structure of the multidimensional risks in green building projects, Journal of Building Engineering, 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106069, 68, (106069), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share