Technical Papers
Dec 6, 2019

Effects of Nonstructural Wall in Progressive Failure of Coastal Residential Buildings Subjected to Strong Winds

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 1

Abstract

With many natural hazards impacting coastal communities, the resilience of low-rise residential wood buildings (LRWBs) in the community has been critical. To better understand structural performance under extreme weather conditions, detailed finite-element analysis (FEA) was carried out by many researchers to perform fragility or vulnerability assessment of LRWBs under different types of loadings, such as wind, flooding, or wave or their combinations. In the current codes and specifications, structural and nonstructural components in LRWBs are differentiated from each other when evaluating their functions in terms of safety. Different important factors or different methodologies are proposed and used for the design or usage of structural and nonstructural structural components in LRWBs. In many detailed models for FEA, nonstructural components are usually simplified as mass, and their stiffness is usually ignored in the analysis. However, for existing LRWBs in coastal communities, after years of exposure and continuous operations, significant damage could have accumulated in the structural and nonstructural components or their connections. As a result, the loading path could have shifted differently compared with the original design. It could be very challenging to identify the loading path and differentiate the functions of these structural and nonstructural components in the loading path with changed stiffness contributions as more uncertainties are introduced in the deterioration process for these structural members or connections. The nonstructural systems, such as the interior walls, could possibly affect the loading path in extreme loading conditions. As a result, progressive failure could lead to different failure scenarios if the nonstructural components are not included in the analysis. In the present study, high-fidelity finite-element models for typical LRWBs were built including typical structural and nonstructural components to evaluate the functionality of the nonstructural walls under extreme loading conditions. For comparison purposes, two different finite-element models (FEMs) under different loading scenarios were evaluated and compared. The first model included only structural members, while the second model included both structural and nonstructural members, such as interior walls, which were simulated using shell and beam elements. Different wind loadings were applied on the models to assess the structural resilience. Vulnerability curves were obtained and compared for these two models. Discussions also include the applicable criterion for differentiating structural and nonstructural members in the typical LRWB.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was partially provided by the Connecticut Sea Grant, University of Connecticut, through Award No. NA14OAR4170086, Project No. R/CH-1, and Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation (CIRCA). The support is greatly appreciated. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

Adam, C., and T. Furtmüller. 2008. “Response of nonstructural components in ductile load-bearing structures subjected to ordinary ground motions.” In Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE). Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
American Wood Council. 2012. National design specification (NDS) for wood construction. Leesburg, VA: American Wood Council.
American Wood Council. 2015. National design specification (NDS) supplement. Leesburg, VA: American Wood Council.
APA (American Plywood Association). 1998. Plywood design specification. Tacoma, WA: APA.
ASCE. 1996. Mechanical connections in wood structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chaudhuri, S. R., and R. Villaverde. 2008. “Effect of building nonlinearity on seismic response of nonstructural components: A parametric study.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (4): 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(661).
Dao, T. N., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2008. “New nonlinear roof sheathing fastener model for use in finite-element wind load applications.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (Oct): 1668–1674. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:10(1668).
Doudak, G. 2005. “Field determination and modeling of load paths in wood light-frame structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ.
FEMA. 1992. Building performance: Hurricane Andrew in Florida. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2005. Mitigation assessment team report: Hurricane Charley in Florida. FEMA 488. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Folz, B., and A. Filiatrault. 2001a. “Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (4): 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:4(433).
Folz, B., and A. Filiatrault. 2001b. SAWS-version 1.0: A computer program for seismic analysis of woodframe buildings. La Jolla, CA: Univ. of California, San Diego.
He, J., F. Pan, C. S. Cai, F. Habte, and A. Chowdhury. 2018. “Finite-element modeling framework for predicting realistic responses of light-frame low-rise buildings under wind loads.” Eng. Struct. 164 (Jun): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.034.
Herzog, B., and Yeh, B. 1999. Nail withdrawal and pull-through strength of structural-use panels nail withdrawal strength of plywood and OSB. Tacoma, WA: Engineered Wood Association.
Hong, J.-P. 2007. “Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model for single and multiple dowel-type wood connections.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Wood Science, Univ. of British Columbia.
Hong, J.-P., and D. Barrett. 2010. “Three-dimensional finite-element modeling of nailed connections in wood.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (Jun): 715–722. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000160.
Hong, J.-P., J. D. Barrett, and F. Lam. 2011. “Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the Japanese traditional post-and-beam connection.” J. Wood Sci. 57 (2): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-010-1151-0.
ICC (International Code Council). 2003. International residential code. Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
ICC (International Code Council). 2006a. International building code, 60478–65795. Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
ICC (International Code Council). 2006b. International residential code. Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
ICC (International Code Council). 2012. International building code. Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
Judd, J. P., and F. S. Fonseca. 2005. “Analytical model for sheathing-to-framing connections in wood shear walls and diaphragms.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (2): 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:2(345).
Kumar, N., V. Dayal, and P. P. Sarkar. 2012. “Failure of wood-framed low-rise buildings under tornado wind loads.” Eng. Struct. 39 (Jun): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.011.
Li, Z., R. Gupta, and T. H. Miller. 1998. “Practical approach to modeling of wood truss roof assemblies.” Pract. Periodical Struct. Des. Constr. 3 (3): 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1998)3:3(119).
Martin, K. G., R. Gupta, D. O. Prevatt, P. L. Datin, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2011. “Modeling system effects and structural load paths in a wood-framed structure.” J. Archit. Eng. 17 (4): 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000045.
NAHB Research Center, Inc. 2000. Residential structural design guide: 2000 edition. Washington, DC: Dept. of Housing and Urban Development.
National Research Council. 1999. Review of the need for a large-scale test facility for research on the effects of extreme winds on structures. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pan, F., C. S. Cai, W. Zhang, and B. Kong. 2014. “Refined damage prediction of low-rise building envelope under high wind load.” Wind Struct. Int. J. 18 (6): 669–691. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.18.6.669.
Pavlou, E., and M. C. Constantinou. 2006. “Response of nonstructural components in structures with damping systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (7): 1108–1117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:7(1108).
Pfretzschner, K. S., R. Gupta, and T. H. Miller. 2014. “Practical modeling for wind load paths in a realistic light-frame wood house.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (3): 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000448.
Pinelli, J.-P., E. Simiu, K. Gurley, C. Subramanian, L. Zhang, A. Cope, J. J. Filliben, and S. Hamid. 2004. “Hurricane damage prediction model for residential structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (11): 1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1685).
Raychowdhury, P., and S. Ray-Chaudhuri. 2015. “Seismic response of nonstructural components supported by a 4-story SMRF: Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction.” Structure 3 (Aug): 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.006.
Ross, R. J. 2010. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material.. Madison, WI: Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service.
Satheeskumar, N., D. J. Henderson, J. D. Ginger, and C. H. Wang. 2017. “Finite element modelling of the structural response of roof to wall framing connections in timber-framed houses.” Eng. Struct. 134 (Mar): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.034.
Shivarudrappa, R., and B. G. Nielson. 2013. “Sensitivity of load distribution in light-framed wood roof systems due to typical modeling parameters.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000323.
Thampi, H., V. Dayal, and P. P. Sarkar. 2010. “Finite element modeling of interaction of tornado with a low-rise timber building.” In Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Computational Wind Engineering. Kanagawa, Japan: International Association for Wind Engineering.
Thampi, H., V. Dayal, and P. P. Sarkar. 2011. “Finite element analysis of interaction of tornados with a low-rise timber building.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 99 (4): 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.004.
Tuomi, R. L., and W. J. McCutcheon. 1978. “Racking strength of light-frame nailed walls.” J. Struct. Div. 104 (7): 1131–1140.
US Census Bureau. 2003. 2000 census of population and housing. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
van de Lindt, J. W., A. Graettinger, R. Gupta, T. Skaggs, S. Pryor, and K. J. Fridley. 2007. “Performance of wood-frame structures during Hurricane Katrina.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 21 (2): 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:2(108).
Villaverde, R. 2006. “Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural components in buildings.” Eng. Struct. 28 (8): 1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.016.
Weston, J., F. Pan, and W. Zhang. 2017. “Resilience study of elevated coastal residential buildings subject to strong winds.” In Proc., Americas Conf. on Wind Engineering, ACWE 2017. Washington, DC: American Association for Wind Engineering.
Weston, J., and W. Zhang. 2017. “Equivalent parameterized beam model for nailed connections in low-rise residential buildings.” Eng. Struct. 145 (Aug): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.002.
Wu, D. 2018. Coastal community resilience assessment for residential building structures subjected to multi-hazards. Master thesis, Storrs, CT: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut.
Yeh, M.-C. 2002. “Racking strength of non-structural wood-framed wall.” For. Prod. Ind. 21 (2): 107–114.
Zisis, I., and T. Stathopoulos. 2012. “Wind load transfer mechanisms on a low wood building using full-scale load data.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (May): 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26Issue 1March 2020

History

Received: Aug 4, 2018
Accepted: Mar 28, 2019
Published online: Dec 6, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 6, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaolong Ma
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
Xuan Li
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
Di Wu
Formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share