Sawtooth Method for Teaching Seismic Design Principles to Architecture Students
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 1
Abstract
Although acknowledged as a must in earthquake-prone countries, the introduction of seismic design principles in schools of architecture is often perceived by the students as a serious limitation to their design freedom. Hence, teaching methods where students are encouraged to devise architectural design strategies that embrace seismic principles and lessen students’ perceptions of reduced design freedom are required. The sawtooth method presented here allows the progressive introduction of seismic design guidelines consistent with the complexity involved in architectural design. This technique comprises an iterative sequence of short tasks or workshops, organized in a zoom-in or zoom-out explorative sequence and embedded within two major seismic-related frameworks: configuration and detailing phases. The sawtooth method has been implemented as a teaching and learning approach in a studio in a faculty of architecture in Izmir, Turkey. The assessment of four case studies reveals that the presented approach helps architecture students to integrate seismic design principles in their projects, facilitating the blending of conceptual approaches with highly realistic scenarios.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the students and instructors who participated in the studio experiences described in this paper and also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that helped to improve this paper.
References
Arnold, C. 1984. “Building configuration: The architecture of seismic design.” Bull. N. Z. Natl. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 17 (2): 83–89.
Arnold, C. 1996. “Architectural aspects of seismic resistant design.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Bachmann, H. 2003. Seismic conceptual design of buildings: Basic principles for engineers, architects, building owners, and authorities. Biel, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Office for Water and Geology.
Cennamo, K., and C. Brandt. 2012. “The ‘right kind of telling’: Knowledge building in the academic design studio.” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 60 (5): 839–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9254-5.
Charleson, A. 1997. “Seismic design within architectural education.” Bull. N. Z. Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 30 (1): 46–50.
Charleson, A. 2008. Seismic design for architects: Outwitting the quake. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Charleson, A. 2018. “Earthquake engineering education in schools of architecture: Developments during the last ten years including rule-of-thumb software.” J. Archit. Eng. 24 (3): 04018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000324.
Charleson, A., and M. Taylor. 2004. “Earthquake architecture explorations.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 9. Tokyo: International Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Charleson, A. W., and P. Wood. 2014. “Enhancing collaboration between architects and structural engineers using preliminary design software.” In Proc., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Technical Conf., 8. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Dutton, T. 2014. “Design and studio pedagogy.” J. Archit. Educ. 41 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461.
Eigbeonan, A. 2013. “Creativity methods in teaching the arch-design studio.” DIMENSI (J. Archit. Built Environ.) 40 (1): 1–10.
Erman, E. 2011. “A critical analysis of earthquake-resistant architectural provisions.” Archit. Sci. Rev. 48 (4): 295–304. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2005.4837.
Felder, R., D. Woods, J. Stice, and A. Rugarcia. 2000. “The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work.” Chem. Eng. Educ. 34 (1): 26–39.
FEMA. 2006. “Designing for earthquakes—A manual for architects.” FEMA-454. Accessed September 18, 2014. www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/8669.
FEMA. 2014. “Reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage—A practical guide.” FEMA-74. Accessed November 30, 2016. www.fema.gov/fema-e-74-reducing-risks-nonstructural-earthquake-damage.
Goldschmidt, G., H. Hochman, and I. Dafni. 2010. “The design studio ‘crit’: Teacher–student communication.” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 24 (3): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089006041000020X.
Kuhn, S. 2001. “Learning from the architecture studio: Implications for project-based pedagogy.” Int. J. Eng. Educ. 17 (4/5): 349–352.
Ledewitz, S. 2014. “Models of design in studio teaching.” J. Archit. Educ. 38 (2): 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1985.10758354.
Mendi, E. 2005. “Evaluation of architectural consciousness and exploration of architecture-based issues in seismic design.” M.Sc. thesis, Building Science, Middle East Technical Univ.
Mitra, K., S. Ailawadi, and D. Rai. 2013. “Initiatives in educating future architects in earthquake resistant design practices.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 84 (5): 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120173.
Oh, Y., S. Ishizaki, M. Gross, and E. Do. 2013. “A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios.” Des. Stud. 34 (3): 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004.
Schön, D. 2014. “The architectural studio as an exemplar of education for reflection-in-action.” J. Archit. Educ. 38 (1): 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1984.10758345.
Shannon, S., and A. Radford. 2011. “Iteration as a strategy for teaching architectural technologies in an architecture studio.” Archit. Sci. Rev. 53 (2): 238–250. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2009.0058.
Slak, T., and V. Kilar. 2007. “Earthquake architecture as an expression of a stronger architectural identity in seismic areas.” In Proc., ERES VI Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures VI, 72–82. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Ünay, A., and C. Özmen. 2006. “Building structure design as an integral part of architecture: A teaching model for students of architecture.” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 16 (3): 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-5241-z.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 19, 2018
Accepted: Jul 8, 2019
Published online: Dec 7, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 7, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.