Building with Compressed Earth Block within the Building Code
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 3
Abstract
Despite the use of earthen materials in building construction for thousands of years, many engineering properties of earthen walls are not well understood, documented, or regulated. California and New Mexico have adopted building codes allowing earthen structures through prescriptive methods that rely on rules of thumb to limit heights and spans of construction. Furthermore, California restricts earthen structures to very limited areas on the basis of soil type. Overall, the prescriptive methods have led to uncertainty about reinforcing requirements. There is a belief among builders who use earthen materials that reinforcement is required only in areas of high earthquake hazard, implying that a geographic area is either seismic or not. In reality, all locations are prone to some seismicity. On the basis of the probability of seismic activity and soil conditions at each locale, every site has a risk that ranges from very low to very high probability of earthquake damage. Energy compliance and structural adequacy are two areas of concern to city officials. This article delineates the processes required to build with compressed stabilized earth blocks (CSEBs) within the building code. The authors determined that the compressive strength of CSEB walls is sufficient in most residential applications, but wall shear strength is more critical. To determine the wall in-plane and out-of-plane shear strength, the authors conducted laboratory tests to investigate the shear strength of CSEB wall assemblies, first without reinforcing (which proved insufficient) and then incorporating geogrid (sometimes referred to in the industry as geofabric) on interior and exterior wall surfaces as a method of lateral reinforcement. The resulting unreinforced wall shear strengths were used to determine where unreinforced CSEBs can be used to meet code strength requirements. The following data demonstrate that CSEBs are viable material for residential construction but are acceptable only for use in limited areas without reinforcing due to assembled wall mass and the seismic loads they create. In addition, this article reviews the energy-compliance process required when designing earthen structures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASCE. (2006). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” Standards 7-05, Reston, VA.
ASTM. (2010) “Standard guide for design of earthen wall building systems.” E2392/E2392M-10e1, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bland, D., Jansen, D., Stirling, B., Qu, B., and Laursen, P. (2011). “In-plane cyclic performance of interlocking compressed earth block shear walls.” Proc., Eleventh North American Masonry Conference, Minneapolis.
Blondet, M., Vargas, J., Velasquez, J., and Tarque, N. (2006). “Experimental study of synthetic mesh reinforcement of historic adobe buildings.” Proc., Structural Analysis of Historic Construction, New Delhi, India.
California Building Standards Commission. (2010). California building code, Sacramento, CA.
Diaz, C. (2007). “Shake table testing of scaled rammed earth models.” Master’s thesis, College of Civil Engineering and Environment Science, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
Dowling, D., Samali, B., and Li, J. (2005). “An improved means of reinforcing adobe walls—External vertical reinforcement.” Proc., SismoAdobe 2005, Pontificia Univ. Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru.
Energy-10 1.8 [Computer software]. Passive Solar Industries Council, Washington, DC.
Gavrilovic, P., Sendova, V., Tashkov, L., Krstevska, L., Ginell, W., and Tolles, L. (1996). “Shake table tests of adobe structures.” Report IZIIS 96-36, Institute of Earthquake Engineering Seismology, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, and Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.
Hallock, J. (2012). “Building with earth and lime—Sustainable projects with compressed earth blocks.” Institute Tierra y Cal, San Miguel de Allende, Guanajuato, Mexico.
International Code Council. (2009a). International building code, Country Club Hills, IL.
International Code Council. (2009b). International residential code for one- and two-family dwellings, Country Club Hills, IL.
Lynne, E., and Adams, C. (2005). Alternative construction—Contemporary natural building methods, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
MSJC (Masonry Standards Joint Committee). (2008a). “Building code requirements and commentary for masonry structures.” ACI 530/ASCE 7/TMS 402, Farmington Hills, MI.
MSJC (Masonry Standards Joint Committee). (2008b). “Specification and commentary for masonry structures.” ACI 530.1/ASCE 6/TMS 602, Farmington Hills, MI.
REScheck 4.4.4 [Computer software]. US Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC.
Rael, R. (2009). Earth architecture, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
Sanchez, L., and Sanchez, A. (2008). Adobe houses for today, Sunstone Press, Santa Fe, NM.
Schroder, L., and Ogletree, V. (2010) Adobe homes for all climates, Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River Junction, VT.
State of New Mexico. (2009). New Mexico residential building code.
Tolles, E. L., Kimbro, E. E., Webster, F. A., and Ginell, W. S. (2000). Seismic stabilization of historic adobe structures—Final report of the Getty Seismic Adobe Project, Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 8, 2015
Accepted: Sep 25, 2015
Published online: Mar 16, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 16, 2016
Published in print: Sep 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.