Modeling of Fabric Structures and Associated Design Issues
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 2
Abstract
Fabric structures demonstrate an enormous application potential of tensioned fabric as a medium for creating dramatic looking, free-form architectural enclosures. However, their design presents a number of challenges. First, their shape cannot be known accurately at the outset; it must be found through a process of form-finding. Second, under imposed loading (wind or snow), they exhibit a visible form-force interaction, which must be taken into account at the load analysis stage. Finally, the manufacture of a three-dimensional fabric surface must involve a patterning stage, which maps the surface onto a series of two-dimensional panels cut in unstrained fabric. As discussed in this paper, all of the design stages require specialist computational modeling based on good understanding of the relationship between form and stress. Much of the discussion in the paper centers on misconceptions associated with form-finding, as well as the inadequacies of some computational approaches to form-finding and patterning. The question of what constitutes an optimal form points to the use of natural principles in the conceptual design of fabric structures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgment
I thank my research fellow, John S. Brew, and a project student, James Bostock, for producing some of the images in this paper.
References
Barnes, M., Grundig, L., and Moncrieff, E. (2003). “Form-finding, load analysis, and patterning.” European design guide for tensile surface structures, M. Mollaert and B. Forster, eds., Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium, 206–210.
Bletzinger, K.-U., et al. (2005). “Computational methods for form finding and optimization of shells and membranes.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 194(30–33), 3438–3452.
Blum, R., Bögner, H., and Némoz, G. (2004). “Material properties and testing.” European design guide for tensile surface structures, M. Mollaert and B. Forster, eds., Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium, 219–241.
Bradatsch, J., et al. (2003). “Form.” European design guide for tensile surface structures, M. Mollaert and B. Forster, eds., Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium, 44–96.
Brand, L. (1947). Vector and tensor analysis, Wiley, New York.
Brew, J. S., and Lewis, W. J. (2003a). “Computational form-finding of tension membrane structures: Non-finite element approaches. I: Use of cubic splines in finding minimal surface membranes.” Int. J. Num. Methods Eng., 56, 651–668.
Brew, J. S., and Lewis, W. J. (2003b). “Computational form-finding of tension membrane structures: Non-finite element approaches. II: Triangular mesh discretisation and control of mesh distortion in modelling minimal surface membranes.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 56(5), 669–684.
Brew, J. S., and Lewis, W. J. (2007). “Free hanging membrane model for shell structures.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 71(13), 1513–1533.
Chilton, J. (2000). Heinz isler. Thomas Telford, London.
Day, A. (1980). “Form-finding, control and modification for tension structures.” Arup J., 15(3), 19–20.
Forster, B. (1994). “Cable and membrane roofs: A historical survey.” Struct. Eng. Rev., 6(3–4), 145–174.
Hildebrandt, S., and Tromba, A. (1984). Mathematics and optimal form, Scientific American Library, New York, 108.
Huntington, C. G. (2003). The tensioned fabric roof, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Isenberg, C. (1978). The science of soap films and soap-bubbles. Tieto, Clevedon, U.K.
Kim, J.-Y., and Lee, J.-B. (2002). “A new technique for optimum cutting pattern generation of membrane structures.” Eng. Structures, 24(6), 745–756.
Lewis, W. J. (1999a). “Lightweight tension structures: An aesthetic integration of geometry and mechanics. I: The role of minimal surfaces and soap films.” Math. Today, 35 (1), 10–16.
Lewis, W. J. (1999b). “Lightweight tension structures: An aesthetic integration of geometry and mechanics. II: Finding the form of minimal surface.” Math. Today, 35(3), 80–84.
Lewis, W. J. (2008). “Computational form-finding methods for fabric structures.” Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers, Engineering Computational Mechanics, Vol. 161, Thomas Telford, London, 139–149.
Lewis, W. J. (2003). Tension structures: Form and behaviour, Thomas Telford, London.
Lewis, W. J. (2010). “Form-finding.” MADE, R. Mehta, ed., IOM Communications, London, 42–43.
Mattheck, C. (1990). “Why they grow, how they grow: The mechanics of trees.” Arboricult. J., 14(1), 1–17.
Mattheck, C. (1998). Design in nature: Learning from trees, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 53–58.
Otto, F., and Rasch, B. (1995). Finding form: Towards an architecture of the minimal, Deutscher Werkbund Bayern, Germany.
Otto, F. (1979). “The aesthetic.” IL, 21, 141–190.
Nitsche, J. C. C. (1989). Lectures on minimal surfaces, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 475–480.
Samyn, P. (2003). “Subway station erasmus.” Designing tensile architecture, M. Mollaert and B. Forster, eds., Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium, 242–254.
Walker, D., and Addis, B. (1997). Happold: The confidence to build, Happold Trust, London.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 19 • Issue 2 • June 2013
Pages: 81 - 88
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 16, 2011
Accepted: May 2, 2012
Published online: May 4, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.