Performance in Fire of Small-Scale CFRP Strengthened Concrete Beams
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 10, Issue 6
Abstract
When strengthening concrete members with fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) materials the strengthening is, typically, undertaken to carry live load. This live load is assumed to remove itself from the strengthened member in the event of a fire. Thus, the fire performance of the FRP is not important. However, if the strengthening system was designed such that the FRP took some of the dead load, then the performance in fire would become important. In this series of tests, 24 reinforced concrete beams were cast. They were divided into eight sets of three. The sets were split into fire tested and control. In the control group were an unstrengthened control set, a set strengthened with bonded carbon FRP (CFRP) plates, and a set with bonded CFRP plates with bolted anchorages. In the fire-tested group were an unstrengthened control set, a set strengthened with bonded CFRP plates, a set with bonded CFRP plates with bolted anchorages, a set strengthened with bonded CFRP plates and a cementitous fire protection system, and a set with bonded CFRP plates with bolted anchorages and a cementitous fire protection system. The unloaded beams were then subjected to a cellulosic fire in a furnace. The adhesive on the unprotected beams was destroyed by the fire, as was the resin in the CFRP plate. On the strengthened beams with a cementitous fire protection system the adhesive was destroyed by the fire but the resin in the CFRP plate was undamaged. All the beams were tested in four-point bending to determine their load capacity and stiffness. Of the non-fire-tested beams the control beams were weakest and the strengthened beams were stronger and stiffer, there being no significant difference between the bolted and nonbolted beams. The fire-tested beams were load tested postfire exposure. Of the fire-tested beams the control beams had the same properties as the non-fire-tested control beams. The unbolted beams had the same strength regardless of fire protection. One of the bolted beams with fire protection was stronger than those without fire protection but not as strong as the nonfire-tested beams. It can be concluded that the strengthening system in the unprotected beams was destroyed in the fire test. Where fire protection was provided this protected the resin in the CFRP plate but not the adhesive bonding the plate to the beams. Bolts helped to keep the plate attached to the beam but did not provide as good a connection as the adhesive.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to thank Tradecc for supplying CFRP plate and epoxy adhesive, and Cafco International for applying their fire protection system and conducting the fire test.
References
ASTM. (2001). “Standard methods of fire test of building construction and materials.” Test method E119-01, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Blontrock, H., Taerwe, L., and Vandevelde, P. (2001). “Fire testing of concrete slabs strengthened with fiber composite laminates.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on FRP Reinforced Concrete Structures, Thomas Telford, London, 547–556.
British Standards Institute (BSI). (1987). BS476-20 “Fire tests on building materials and structures. Part 20: Method for determination of the fire resistance of elements of construction (general principles).” BS476-20, BSI, London.
Clarke, J. L. (1996). Structural design of polymer composites—Eurocomp design code and handbook, E & FN Spon, London.
The Concrete Society. (1990). “Assessment and repair of fire-damaged concrete structures.” Technical Rep. 33, Slough, U.K.
The Concrete Society. (2004). “Design guidance for strengthening concrete structures using fiber composite materials.” Technical Rep. 55, Camberley, U.K.
Deuring, M. (1994). “Brandversuche an nachtralich verstarken Tragern aus Beton.” EMPA No. 148 795, Eidgenössische Material prüfungs und Forschungs Anstalt, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
Dunker, K. F., and Rabbat, B. G. (1993). “Why America’s bridges are crumbling.” Sci. Am., March, 66–72.
Kodur, V., Green, M., Bisby, L., and Williams, B. (2004). “Evaluating the fire performance of FRP-strengthened concrete structures.” Concr. Eng. Int., 8(2), 48–50.
Mays, G. C. (1992). Durability of concrete structures—Investigation, repair, protection, E & FN Spon, London.
Moy, S. S. J. (2001). ICE design and practice guides—FRP composites. Life extension and strengthening of metallic structures. The Institution of Civil Engineers, London.
National Research Council Canada (NRCC). (2005). “Fire resistance of FRP-reinforced concrete members.” Factsheet 47, Ottawa, Ont., Canada.
Symons, J. (2002). “Strengthening reinforced concrete beams by gluing carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) plates to them.” Report, Royal Military College of Science, Cranfield Univ., Shrivenham, U.K.
Tann, D. B. (2004). “Behavior of FRP strengthened concrete elements in fire.” Proc., Composites Processing Association Annual Conf., Composites Processing Association, Pontyclun, U.K.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 28, 2005
Accepted: Mar 24, 2006
Published online: Dec 1, 2006
Published in print: Dec 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.