TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 15, 2004

Environmental Impact of Steel and Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Pavements

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 8, Issue 6

Abstract

The environmental load of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforced pavement was compared with that of steel reinforced pavement. Replacing steel rebars with FRP rebars can lead to changes in the concrete mix and pavement structure at the erection stage, to a reduced need for maintenance activities related to steel corrosion, and to different recycling opportunities at the disposal stage. The current study examined all of these variables. The environmental load of FRP reinforced pavement was found to be significantly lower than that of steel reinforced pavement. This results mainly from the fact that FRP reinforced pavement requires less maintenance, its cement content and concrete cover over reinforcement can be reduced, and the reinforcement itself generates a smaller environmental load.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
American Concrete Institute. (ACI) (2001). “Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars.” 440.1R-01, Farmington Hills, Mich.
2.
Bank, L. C., Putermna, M., and Katz, A. (1998). “The effect of material degradation on bond properties of FRP reinfocing bars in concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 95(3), 232–243.
3.
Benmokrane, B., Wang, P., Ton-That, T. M., Rahman, H., and Robert, J. F. (2002). “Durability of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars in concrete environment.” J. Compos. Constr., 6(3), 143–153.
4.
CEN European Committee for Standardization. ( 1999). “Design of concrete structures—Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings.” Eurocode 2, preEN 1999-1, Brussels, Belgium.
5.
CEN European Committee for Standardization. ( 2000). “Concrete—Part 1: Specification, performance, production and conformity.” EN 206, Brussels, Belgium.
6.
Eaton, K. J., and Amato, A. (1998). “A comparative life cycle assessment of steel and concrete framed office building.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 46(1–3), 163.
7.
Ehlen, M. A. (1997). “Life-cycle costs of new construction materials.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 3(4), 129–133.
8.
Ehlen, M. A. (1999). “Life cycle costs of fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge decks.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 11(3), 224–230.
9.
Ehlen, M. A., and Marshall, H. E. (1996). “The economics of new technology materials: A case study of FRP bridge decking.” NISTIR 5864, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
10.
Florida Dept. of Transportation (FDOT). (2002). “Structures design guidelines for load and resistance factor design.” Tallahassee, Fla.
11.
Goedkoop, M., and Spriensma, R. (2000). “The eco-indicator 99, a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, methodology report.” Pré Consultants, Amersfoort, 〈www.pre.nl〉.
12.
Horvath, A., and Hendrickson, C. (1998). “Comparison of environmental implications of asphalt and steel reinforced concrete pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1626, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 105–113.
13.
International Organization of Standardization (ISO). (1997). “Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework.” 14040, Switzerland.
14.
International Organization of Standardization (ISO). (1998). “Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis.” 14041, Switzerland.
15.
International Organization of Standardization (ISO). (2000). “Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment.” 14042, Switzerland.
16.
International Organization of Standardization (ISO). (2000b). “Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle interpretation.” 14043, Switzerland.
17.
Katz, A. (2003). “Properties of concrete made with recycled aggregate from partially hydrated old concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., 33(5), 703–711.
18.
Katz, A., Bank, L. C., and Puterman, M. (2001). “Durability of FRP rebars after four years of exposure.” Fiber reinforced plastics for reinforced concrete structures-FRPRCS-5, C. J. Burgoyne, ed., Thomas Telford, London, 497–503.
19.
Kibert, C.K., Chini, S.A., and Muszynski, L.C. (1998). “Environmental issues of composite building materials.” Proc., Second Int. Conf. on Composite Materials in Infrastructure, ICCI ’98, H. Saadamenesh, ed., Tucson.
20.
Mueller, A., and Winkler, A. (1998). “Characteristics of processed concrete rubble.” Proc., Sustainable Construction: Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregate, N. A. Henherson, and M. C. Limbachiya, eds., Thomas Telford, London, 109–119.
21.
Nanni, A., Bakis, C.E., and Mathew, J.A. (1998). “Acceleration of FRP bond degradation.” Proc. Durability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction, B. Benmokrane, and H. Rahman, eds., Univ. of Sherbrooke, Canada, 45–56.
22.
Nystrom, H. E., Watkins, S. E., Nanni, A., and Murray, S. (2003). “Financial viability of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bridges.” J. Manage. Eng., 19(1), 2–8.
23.
Pecce, M., Manfredi, G., and Cosenza, E. (2000). “Experimental response and code models of GFRP RC beams in bending.” J. Compos. Constr., 4(4), 182–190.
24.
Pilakoutas, K., Neocleous, K., and Guadagnini, M. (2002). “Design philosophy issues of fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete structures.” J. Compos. Constr., 6(3), 154–161.
25.
RILEM 121-DRG (1994). “Specification for concrete with recycled aggregates.” Mater. Struct., 27, 557–559.
26.
Tavakoli, M., and Soroushian, P. (1996). “Strengths of recycled aggregate concrete made using field-demolished concrete as aggregate.” ACI Mater. J., 93(2), 182–190.
27.
Uomoto, T., and Ohga, H. (1996). “Performance of fiber reinforced plastics for construction reinforcement.” Proc. Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, H. H. El-Brady et al., eds., Canadian Society for Civil Engineers, Montreal, 125–132.
28.
Widman, J. (1998). “Environmental impacts assessment of steel bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 46(1–3), 412.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 8Issue 6December 2004
Pages: 481 - 488

History

Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amnon Katz
National Building Research Institute, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share