Model-Predicted Groundwater Circulation Well Performance
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
Groundwater circulation well (GCW) techniques are an innovative remedial technology that may effectively remediate contaminated groundwater in areas unfavorable to more traditional technologies. Traditional pump-and-treat systems may be problematic where concentrated hot spots of contamination are present, aquifer drawdown due to remedial activities is unacceptable, surface discharge of treated groundwater is unwanted, or property acquisition is challenging. The vertical component of groundwater flow induced by GCW systems presents a new challenge to practitioners evaluating their potential performance. Modifications were made to two familiar pump-and-treat analysis tools—capture zone type curves and MODFLOW numerical groundwater flow modeling—to predict site-specific effectiveness of GCW technologies. These techniques were used to predict the GCW treatment area dimensions, which included the capture zone, recharge zone, and circulation cell diameter. Additionally, GCW design parameters including GCW spacing, screen length, screen placement, and circulation flow rate were determined. The state of the practice is to use these predictive tools to design an instrumentation scheme that can effectively evaluate the performance of GCW systems during full-scale pilot testing.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allmon, W. E., Everett, L. G., Lightner, A. T., Alleman, B., Boyd, T. J., and Spargo, B. J. ( 1999). “Groundwater circulating well technology assessment.” Rep. No. NRL/PU/6115-99-384, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
2.
Barrash, W., and Dougherty, M. E. ( 1996). “Modeling axially symmetric and nonsymmetric flow to a well with MODFLOW, and application to Goddard2 well test, Boise, Idaho.” Groundwater J., 35(4), 602–611.
3.
Fetter, C. W. ( 1994). Applied hydrogeology. 3rd Ed., Macmillan, New York.
4.
Forman, S., Llewellyn, T., Morgan, S., Green, D., Gates, K., and DeLong, G. ( 2000). “Numerical simulation and pilot testing of a recirculation well.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, G. Wickramanayake and A. Gavaskar, eds., Battele, Press, Columbus, Ohio.
5.
Gvirtzman, H., and Gonen, O. ( 1995). “Feasibility study of in-well vapor stripping using airlift pumping.” Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 15(4), 155–162.
6.
Herrling, B., Buermann, W., Stamm, J., and Schoen, M. ( 1990). “UVB technique for in-situ groundwater remediation of strippable contaminants: Operation and dimensioning of wells.” Proc., Envirotech Vienna.
7.
Herrling, B., Stamm, J., Alesi, E. J., Brimmel, P., Hirschberger, F., and Sick, M. R. ( 1991a). “In situ groundwater remediation of strippable contaminants by vacuum vaporizer wells (UVB): Operation of the well and report about cleaned industrial sites.” 3rd Forum on Innovative Haz. Waste Treatment Technol.: Domestic and Int., Dallas, Tex.
8.
Herrling, B., Stamm, J., and Buermann, W. ( 1991b). “Hydraulic circulation system for in situ bioreclamation and/or in situ remediation of strippable contamination.” Proc., In Situ and On-Site Bioreclamation, San Diego, Calif.
9.
Javandel, I., and Tsang, C.-F., ( 1986). “Capture-zone type curves: A tool for aquifer cleanup.” Ground Water, 24(5), 616–625.
10.
MacDonald, T. R., and Kitanidis, P. K. ( 1993). “Modeling the free surface of an unconfined aquifer near a recirculation well.” Ground Water, 31(5).
11.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. ( 1988). “MODFLOW—A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model.” Techniques of water resources investigations of United States Geological Survey, Book 6, Ch. A1, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
12.
Philip, R. D., and Walter, G. R. ( 1992). “Prediction of flow and hydraulic head fields for vertical circulation wells.” Ground Water, 30(5).
13.
Pinto, M. J., Gvirtzman, H., and Gorelick, S. M. ( 1997). “Laboratory-scale analysis of aquifer remediation by in-well vapor stripping. 2: Modeling results.” J. Contaminant Hydro., 29.
14.
Pollock, D. W. ( 1989). “MODPATH, documentation of computer programs to compute and display pathlines using results from the USGS MODFLOW flow model.” U.S. Geological Survey Open File Rep. 89-381, Reston, Va.
15.
Stallard, W. M., Wu, K. C., Shi, N., and Yavuz Corapcioglu, M. (1996). “Two-dimensional hydraulics of recirculating ground-water remediation wells in unconfined aquifers.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 122(8), 692–699.
16.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1998). “Field application of in situ remediation technologies: Ground-water circulation wells.” EPA Rep. No. 542-R-98-009, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 5 • Issue 4 • October 2001
Pages: 203 - 210
History
Received: Apr 19, 2000
Published online: Oct 1, 2001
Published in print: Oct 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.