VOC and SVOC Emissions from Slurry and Solid Phase Bioremediation Processes
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
Gaseous emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-VOCs (SVOCs) from slurry and solid phase bioremediation processes were evaluated. The specific processes considered were those used for the bioremediation of concentrated industrial wastes and of contaminated soils and sediments. The purpose of the evaluation was to document the extent to which such processes emit VOCs and SVOCs. Such information is needed to answer questions such as (1) what are the VOC and SVOC emissions that occur during the operation of these processes?; (2) should emission controls be considered for such processes?; and (3) to what extent does volatilization contribute to the loss of organic compounds in what is considered a bioremediation process? These questions are relevant to understanding the performance of aerobic processes treating concentrated hydrocarbons. The results of this evaluation indicated that, although volatile losses of VOCs and SVOCs can occur from slurry and solid phase bioremediation units, in such units, biodegradation is the primary method of SVOC loss. In well-acclimated bioremediation units, biodegradation of xylene/somers also can be a primary chemical loss mechanism. In situations where mass balances of SVOCs could be determined, volatile losses of SVOCs such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls were <0.1% and frequently <0.01% of the mass of such chemicals in the bioremediation units. Greater volatile losses occurred in the initial phase of units operated as batch bioreactors. This is likely due to higher concentration driving forces from the liquid phase to the air phase coupled with biomass that is not fully acclimated to degrading the added VOCs and SVOCs. To minimize volatilization losses from bioreactors, the bioreactors should be designed and operated as well-acclimated continuously fed units rather than as intermittent batch units. There are many fundamental and operational factors that can affect gaseous emissions from bioremediation units. The more important factors are the partitioning of organic chemicals to solids in the unit, rate of microbial activity, volatility of the chemicals, and manner in which the unit is operated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA). ( 1995). “Bioremediation tests for Massena Lagoon sludges/sediments—Vol. 1—Main text.” Prepared for U.S. Envir. Protection Agency and New York State Dept. of Envir. Conservation by ALCOA Remediation Proj. Org. and Envir. Technol. Ctr., Pittsburgh.
2.
Castaldi, F. J. ( 1994). “Slurry bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil wash concentrates.” Applied biotechnology for site remediation, R. E. Hinchee, D. B. Anderson, F. B. Metting, and G. D. Sayles, eds., CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 99–107.
3.
Castaldi, F. J., and Ford, D. L. ( 1991). “Slurry bioremediation of petrochemical waste sludges.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Waste Mgmt. in Chemical and Petr. Industries, A. J. Englande and W. W. Eckenfelder, Jr., eds., International Association on Water Pollution Research, New Orleans, 210–217.
4.
Dupont, R. R. et al. ( 1997). Bioremediation, American Academy of Environmental Engineers, Annapolis, Md.
5.
Geerdink, M. J., Kleijntjens, R. H., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., and Luyben, K. C. A. M. (1996). “Microbial decontamination of polluted soil in a slurry process.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 122(11), 975–982.
6.
Hayes, K. W., Meyers, J. D., and Huddleston, R. L. ( 1995). “Biopile treatability, bioavailability, and toxicity evaluation of a hydrocarbon impacted soil.” Applied bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons, R. E. Hinchee, J.-A. Kittel, and H. J. Reisinger, eds., Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, 249–256.
7.
Linz, D., and Nakles, D. V., eds. ( 1997). Environmentally acceptable endpoints in soil, American Academy of Environmental Engineers, Annapolis, Md., 341–355.
8.
Loehr, R. C. ( 1993). “Bioremediation of soils.” Chapter 20, Geotechnical practice for waste disposal, D. E. Daniel, ed., Chapman & Hall, New York, 520–550.
9.
Loehr, R. C., and Webster, M. T. ( 1996). “Performance of long term, field scale bioremediation processes.” J. Haz. Mat., 50, 105–120.
10.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). ( 1991). New York State air guide-1, Guidelines for the control of toxic ambient air contaminants, Division of Air Resources, Albany, N.Y.
11.
Olivera, F. L., Loehr, R. C., Coplin, B. C., Eby, H., and Webster, M. T. ( 1998). “Prepared bed land treatment of soils containing diesel and crude oil hydrocarbons.” J. Soil Contamination, 7, 657–674.
12.
Pope, D. F., and Matthews, J. E. ( 1993). “Bioremediation using the land treatment concept.” EPA/600/R-93/164, Ofc. of Res. and Devel., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
13.
Remediation Technologies, Inc. (RETEC). ( 1993). “Microbiological processing of petroleum oily sludges—Final report—Step 3: Pilot plant demonstration of biotreatment process for oily sludges.” Rep. Prepared for the Petr. Envir. Res. Forum, Project 87-05, Austin, Tex.
14.
Ryan, J. R., Loehr, R. C., and Rucker, E. ( 1991). “Bioremediation of organic contaminated soils.” J. Haz. Mat., 28, 159–169.
15.
Smith, J. R., Tomicek, R. M., Swallow, P. V., Weightman, R. L., Nakles, D. V., and Helbling, M. ( 1995). “Definition of biodegradation endpoints for PAH contaminated soils using a risk-based approach.” Hydrocarbon contaminated soils, P. T. Kostecki, ed., Vol. 5, Amherst Scientific Publishers, Amherst, Mass., 531–572.
16.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1990). “Slurry biodegradation—Engineering bulletin.” Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C.
17.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1995). “Bioremediation in the field.” USEPA/540/N-95-500, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
18.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1997). “Remediation Technologies, Inc. tank based bioslurry treatment for PAH-contaminated sediments—Innovative technology evaluation report.” Final Rep., Nat. Risk Mgmt. Res. Lab., Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati.
19.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1998). “Analysis of compost as an environmental remediation technology.” EPA 530-R-98-008, Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: May 30, 2001
Published online: Oct 1, 2001
Published in print: Oct 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.