Dual Porosity and Secondary Consolidation
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 7
Abstract
In this paper, the results of a series of experiments using one-dimensional oedometer testing, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and scanning electron microscopy are reported on kaolinite samples with known and controlled fabric associations to reexamine the dual-porosity hypothesis for the underlying mechanisms of secondary consolidation. The oedometer testing results indicate that the pH 7.8 sample (face-to-face aggregated structure) has the smallest values of compression index, , and secondary compression index, . The pH 4 sample (flocculated but dispersed structure) has the largest values, while the pH 7.8 with salt sample (flocculated and aggregated structure) has medium values. The ratios for these three samples are similar regardless of the structure and consolidation pressure. The MIP results on pore-size evolution in the pH 7.8 with salt sample show that both primary and secondary consolidation processes preferentially occur in the larger and weaker interaggregated pores instead of in the smaller and stronger intraaggregate pores. These oedometer testing and MIP results do not support the dual-porosity hypothesis, whereas they suggest that the primary and secondary consolidation processes involve the same physical factors.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Grant No. HKUST6034/02E) and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Grant No. HIA04/05.EG02). The writers are grateful to the reviewers for valuable comments.
References
Barden, L. (1969). “Time dependent deformation of normally consolidated clays and peats.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 100(4), 407–425.
Berry, P. L., and Poskitt, T. J. (1972). “The consolidation of peat.” Geotechnique, 22(1), 27–52.
Delage, P., and Lefebvre, G. (1984). “Study of the structure of a sensitive Champlain clay and of its evolution during consolidation.” Can. Geotech. J., 21, 21–35.
Flegmann, A. W., Goodwin, J. W., and Ottewill, R. H. (1969). “Rheological studies on kaolinite suspensions.” Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 31, 31–45.
Griffiths, F. J., and Joshi, R. C. (1991). “Change in pore size distribution owing to secondary consolidation of clays.” Can. Geotech. J., 28, 20–24.
Ichikawa, Y., Kawamura, K., Theramast, N., and Kitayama, K. (2004). “Secondary and tertial consolidation of bentonite clay: Consolidation test, molecular dynamics simulation, and multiscale homogenization analysis.” Mech. Mater., 36, 487–513.
Israelachvili, N. (1991). Intermolecular and surface focus, 2nd Ed., Academic, London.
Jepson, W. B. (1984). “Kaolins: Their properties and uses.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 311, 411–432.
Ma, C., and Eggleton, R. A. (1999). “Cation exchange capacity of kaolinite.” Clays Clay Miner., 47(2), 174–180.
Mesri, G. (1973). “Coefficient of secondary compression.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 99(1), 123–137.
Mesri, G. (2003). “Primary compression and secondary compression.” Soil behavior and soft ground construction, Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 119, ASCE, Reston, Va., 122–166.
Mesri, G., and Godlewski, M. P. (1977). “Time and stress-compressibility interrelationship.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 103(5), 417–430.
Mitchell, J. K., and Soga, K. (2005). Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Nagaraj, T. S., Vatsala, A., and Srinivasa Murthy, B. R. (1990). “Discussion on change in pore size distribution due to consolidation of clays.” Geotechnique, 40(2), 303–309.
Navarro, V., and Alonso, E. E. (2001). “Secondary compression of clays as a local dehydration process.” Geotechnique, 51(10), 859–869.
Penumadu, D., and Dean, J. (2000). “Compressibility effect in evaluating the pore-size distribution of kaolin clay using mercury intrusion porosimetry.” Can. Geotech. J., 37, 393–405.
Santamarina, J. C., Klein, K. A., and Fam, M. A. (2001). Soils and waves, Wiley, New York.
Sposito, G. (1998). “On points of zero charge.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2825–2819.
Stumm, W. (1992). Chemistry of the solid-water interface, Wiley, New York.
van Olphen, H. (1991). An introduction to clay colloid chemistry: For clay technologists, geologists, and soil scientists, Reprint Ed., Wiley, New York.
Wang, Y. H., and Siu, W. K. (2006). “Structure characteristics and mechanical properties of kaolinite soils. I: Surface charges and structural characterization.” Can. Geotech. J., 43(6), 587–600.
Washburn, E. W. (1921). “A note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 7, 115–116.
Zeevaart, L. (1986). “Consolidation in the intergranular viscosity of highly compressible soils.” Consolidation of soils: Testing and evaluation, ASTM Special Technical Publication, 892, ASTM, Philadelphia, 257–281.
Zhou, Z. H., and Gunter, W. D. (1992). “The nature of the surface charge of kaolinite.” Clays Clay Miner., 40(3), 365–368.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 7 • July 2007
Pages: 793 - 801
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 15, 2006
Accepted: Feb 1, 2007
Published online: Jul 1, 2007
Published in print: Jul 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.