Key Parameters for Strength Control of Artificially Cemented Soils
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 2
Abstract
Often, the use of traditional techniques in geotechnical engineering faces obstacles of economical and environmental nature. The addition of cement becomes an attractive technique when the project requires improvement of the local soil. The treatment of soils with cement finds application, for instance, in the construction of pavement base layers, in slope protection of earth dams, and as a support layer for shallow foundations. However, there are no dosage methodologies based on rational criteria as exist in the case of the concrete technology, where the water/cement ratio plays a fundamental role in the assessment of the target strength. This study therefore aims to quantify the influence of the amount of cement, the porosity and the moisture content on the strength of a sandy soil artificially cemented, as well as to evaluate the use of a water/cement ratio and a voids/cement ratio to assess its unconfined compression strength. A number of unconfined compression tests, triaxial compression tests, and measurements of matric suction were carried out. The results show that the unconfined compression strength increased linearly with the increase in the cement content and exponentially with the reduction in porosity of the compacted mixture. The change in moisture content also has a marked effect on the unconfined compression strength of mixtures compacted at the same dry density. It was shown that, for the soil-cement mixture in an unsaturated state (which is usual for compacted fills), the water/cement ratio is not a good parameter for the assessment of unconfined compression strength. In contrast, the voids/cement ratio, defined as the ratio between the porosity of the compacted mixture and the volumetric cement content, is demonstrated to be the most appropriate parameter to assess the unconfined compression strength of the soil-cement mixture studied.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to express their gratitude to PRONEX-FAPERGS (project PRONEX-FAPERGS No. 04/0841.0) and CNPq (projects Pós-Doutorado no Exterior No. 200957/2005-8, Produtividade em Pesquisa No. 3008032/2004-4 and Edital Universal 2004 No. 472643/2004-5 and) for their financial support to the research group. The writers would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that improved the content of this paper.
References
Azambuja, R. M. B. (2004). “Mechanical and hydraulic behavior of soil-cement-bentonite mixtures.” MSc thesis, Graduate Course in Civil Engineering, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (in Portuguese).
Brazilian Standard Association. (1995). “Rocks and soils—Terminology.” NBR 6502. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (in Portuguese).
British Standard Methods of Test. (BS). (1990). “Soil for civil engineering purposes.” BS 1377.
Catton, M. D. (1962). “Soil-cement technology—A résumé.” Research and Development Laboratories of the Portland Cement Association: Bulletin 136. [Reprinted from the Journal of PCA Research and Development Laboratories, 4(1), 13–21].
Chandler, R. J., Crilly, M. S., and Montgomery-Smith, G. (1992). “A low-cost method of assessing clay desiccation for low-rise buildings.” Proc., Institute of Civil Engineers, Civil Engineering, 92(2), 82–89.
Clayton, C. R. I., Khatrush, S. A., Bica, A. V. D., and Siddique, A. (1989). “The use of hall effect semiconductors in geotechnical instrumentation.” Geotech. Test. J., 12(1), 69–76.
Clough, G. W., Rad, N. S., Bachus, R. C., and Sitar, N. (1981). “Cemented sands under static loading.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 107(6), 799–817.
Consoli, N. C., Prietto, P. D. M., Carraro, J. A. H., and Heineck, K. S. (2001). “Behavior of compacted soil-fly ash-carbide lime-fly ash mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127(9), 774–782.
Consoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V., and Prietto, P. D. M. (2000). “The influence of curing under stress on the triaxial response of cemented soils.” Geotechnique, 50(1), 99–105.
Consoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V., and Prietto, P. D. M. (2006). “Yielding-compressibility-strength relationship for an artificially cemented soil cured under stress.” Geotechnique, 56(1), 69–72.
Consoli, N. C., Vendruscolo, M. A., and Prietto, P. D. M. (2003). “Behavior of plate load tests on soil layers improved with cement and fiber.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(1), 96–101.
Dass, R. N., Yen, S. C., Dass, B. M., Puri, V. K., and Wrigth, M. A. (1994). “Tensile stress-strain characteristics of lightly cemented sand.” Geotech. Test. J., 17(3), 305–314.
Dupas, J. M., and Pecker, A. (1979). “Static and dynamic properties of sand-cement.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 105(3), 419–436.
Felt, E. J. (1955). “Factors influencing physical properties of soil-cement mixtures.” Research and Development Laboratories of the Portland Cement Association: Bulletin D5, Authorized Reprint from Bulletin 108 of the Highway Research Board.
Horpibulsuk, S., Miura, N., and Nagaraj, T. S. (2003). “Assessment of strength development in cement-admixed high water content clays with Abram’s Law as a basis.” Geotechnique, 53(4), 439–444.
Ingles, O. G., and Metcalf, J. B. (1972). Soil stabilization—Principles and practice, Butterworths, Australia.
Ismail, M. A., Joer, H. A., Randolph, M. F., and Meritt, A. (2002). “Cementation of porous materials using calcite.” Geotechnique, 52(5), 313–324.
La Rochelle, P., Leroueil., S., Trak, B., Blais-Leroux, L., and Tavenas, F. (1988). “Observational approach to membrane and area corrections in triaxial tests.” Proc., Symp. on Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, Louisville, ASTM, Philadelphia, 715–731.
Marinho, F. A. M. (1995). “Suction measurement through filter paper technique.” Proc., Unsaturated Soils Seminar, Porto Alegre: CPGEC/CNPQ/FINEP/FAPERGS/ABMS, 111–125 (in Portuguese).
Mitchell, J. K. (1981). “Soil improvement—State-of-the-art report.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Int. Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, 509–565.
Moore, R. K., Kennedy, T. W., and Hudson, W. R. (1970). “Factors affecting the tensile strength of cement-treated materials.” Highway Research Record: Soil Stabilization: Multiple Aspects, Washington, D.C., HRB, 315, 64–80.
Porbaha, A., Shibuya, S., and Kishida, T. (2000). “State of the art in deep mixing technology. Part III: Geomaterial characterization.” Ground Improvement, J. ISSMGE, 4(3), 91–110.
Porbaha, A., Tanaka, H., and Kobayashi, M. (1998). “State of the art in deep mixing technology. Part II: Applications.” Ground Improvement, J. ISSMGE, 2(2), 125–139.
Schnaid, F., Prietto, P. D. M., and Consoli, N. C. (2001). “Characterization of cemented sand in triaxial compression.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127(10), 857–868.
Thomé, A., Donato, M., Consoli, N. C., and Graham, J. (2005). “Circular footings on a cemented layer above weak foundation soil.” Can. Geotech. J., 42, 1569–1584.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 23, 2006
Accepted: Oct 6, 2006
Published online: Feb 1, 2007
Published in print: Feb 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.