Pipeline Supported on a Nonuniform Winkler Soil Model
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 10
Abstract
After a buried bell-and-spigot pipeline was installed at a site, an interior survey showed that some of the pipe sections were as much as above the intended grade. One proposed explanation for this phenomenon was that the pipe sections were acting like teeter-totters, with one end settling and the other heaving, due to the variable foundation conditions. Later, when a similar pipeline was planned for the same vicinity, analyses were made utilizing a nonuniform Winkler soil model with randomized spring constants. The analyses showed that the calculated settlements were negligibly small; and there was no predicted teeter-totter behavior. Subsequent measurements confirmed the analyses.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bowles, J. E. (1975). “Combined and special footings.” Foundation engineering handbook, H. F. Winterkorn and H.-Y. Fang, eds., Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 504–527.
Kreyszig, E. (1968). Advanced engineering mathematics, Wiley, New York.
Meyerhof, G. G. (1965). “Shallow foundations.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 91(2), 21–32.
Poulos, H. G., and Davis, E. H. (1980). Pile foundation analysis and design, Wiley, New York.
Scott, R. F. (1981). Foundation analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
Winkler, E. (1867). Die lehre von elastizität und festigkeit, H. Dominicus, Prague, 182.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 4, 2003
Accepted: Mar 1, 2005
Published online: Oct 1, 2005
Published in print: Oct 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.