Effect of Soil-Particle Size Contrast on Capillary Barrier Performance
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 10
Abstract
Capillary barriers, consisting of sloping layers of fine over coarse soils, have been investigated as an alternative for hydraulic isolation of buried waste. Based on analytical results, it is known that the lateral diversion of water over a capillary barrier interface is maximized as the soil-particle size contrast becomes infinitely large. However, practical limitations affecting interface integrity and slope stability restrict the reasonable particle-size contrast. In this note, design guidance is provided for selection of soil-particle size contrast in a capillary barrier system. Results indicate that near-maximum lateral diversion of water can be obtained with a modest contrast between the fine and coarse materials of a capillary barrier. For a given combination of infiltration rate, interface slope, and fine material characteristics representing the most conservative case, 80% of the maximum diversion can be obtained with an underlying coarse material that is only 2.5 times coarser than the overlying fine material. With a coarse material that is 5 times coarser than the overlying fine material, 90% of the maximum diversion is obtained.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bouwer, H. ( 1966). “Rapid field measurement of air entry value and hydraulic conductivity of soil as significant parameters in flow system analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 2(4), 729–738.
2.
Carsel, R. F., and Parrish, R. S. ( 1988). “Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics.” Water Resour. Res., 24(5), 755–769.
3.
Gardner, W. R. ( 1958). “Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table.” Soil Sci., 86, 228–232.
4.
Hopmans, J. W. ( 1987). “A comparison of various methods to scale soil hydraulic properties.” J. Hydro., 93, 241–256.
5.
Jury, W. A., Russo, D., and Sposito, G. ( 1987). “The spatial variability of water and solute transport properties in unsaturated soil. II: Scaling models of water transport.” Hilgardia, 55, 33–56.
6.
Khire, M. W., Benson, C. H., and Bosscher, P. J. (1999). “Field data from a capillary barrier and model predictions with UNSAT-H.”J. of Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 125(6), 518–527.
7.
Miller, E. E., and Miller R. D. ( 1956). “Physical theory for capillary flow phenomena.” J. Appl. Phys., 27, 324–332.
8.
Morris, C. E., and Stormont, J. C. (1997). “Capillary barriers and subtitle D covers: Estimating equivalency.”J. Envir. Engrg., 123(1), 3–10.
9.
Nyhan, J. W., Hakonson, T. E., and Drennon, B. J. ( 1990). “A water balance study of two landfill cover designs for semiarid regions.” J. Envir. Qual., 19, 281–288.
10.
Nyhan, J. W., Schofield, T. G., and Starmer, R. H. ( 1997). “A water balance study of four landfill cover designs varying in slope for semiarid regions.” J. Envir. Qual., 26, 1385–1392.
11.
Rockhold, M. L., Rossi, R. E., and Hills, R. G. ( 1996). “Application of similar media and conditional simulation for modeling water flow and tritium transport.” Water Resour. Res., 32(3), 595–609.
12.
Ross, B. ( 1990). “The diversion capacity of capillary barriers.” Water Resour. Res., 26(10), 2625–2629.
13.
Russo, D., and Bresler, E. ( 1980). “Scaling soil hydraulic properties of a heterogeneous field.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 681–684.
14.
Schroth, M. H., Ahearn, S. J., Selker, J. S., and Istok, J. D. ( 1996). “Characterization of Miller-similar silica sands for laboratory hydrologic studies.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60, 1331–1339.
15.
Selker, J. S. ( 1997). “Design of interface shape for protective capillary barriers.” Water Resour. Res., 33, 259–260.
16.
Shouse, P. J., and Mohanty, B. P. ( 1995). “Scaling of near-saturated hydraulic conductivity measured using disc infiltrometers.” Water Resour. Res., 34(5), 1195–1205.
17.
Steenhuis, T. S., Parlange, J.-Y., and Kung, K.-J. S. ( 1991). “Comment on `The diversion capacity of capillary barriers,' by Benjamin Ross.” Water Resour. Res., 27(8), 2155–2156.
18.
Stormont, J. C. ( 1995). “The effect of constant anisotropy on capillary barrier performance.” Water Resour. Res., 31, 783–785.
19.
van Genuchten, M. T. ( 1980). “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898.
20.
Walter, M. T. et al. ( 2000). “Funneled flow mechanisms in a sloping layered soil: Laboratory investigation.” Water Resour. Res., 36(4), 841–849.
21.
Ward, A. L., and Gee, G. W. ( 1997). “Performance evaluation of a field-scale surface barrier.” J. Envir. Qual., 26, 694–705.
22.
Warrick, A. W., Mullen, G. J., and Nielsen, D. R. ( 1977). “Scaling field-measured soil hydraulic properties using a similar media concept.” Water Resour. Res., 13, 355–362.
23.
Warrick, A. W., Wierenga, P. J., and Pan, L. ( 1997). “Downward water flow through sloping layers in the vadose zone: analytical solutions for diversions.” J. Hydro., 192, 321–337.
24.
Webb, S. W. ( 1997). “Generalization of Ross' tilted capillary barrier diversion formula for different two-phase characteristic curves.” Water Resour. Res., 33(8), 1855–1859.
25.
Zaslavsky, D., and Sinai, G. (1981a). “Surface hydrology: III—Causes of lateral flow.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 107(1), 37–52.
26.
Zaslavsky, D., and Sinai, G. (1981b). “Surface hydrology: IV—Flow in sloping, layered soil.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 107(1), 53–64.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 10 • October 2001
Pages: 885 - 888
History
Received: Jun 9, 2000
Published online: Oct 1, 2001
Published in print: Oct 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.