Model Testing of Two-Layer Railway Track Ballast
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 4
Abstract
Railway track ballast requires regular attention to maintain line and level. A recently developed maintenance method, known as pneumatic ballast injection (PBI) or stoneblowing, re-levels and realigns the track by lifting the sleepers and track and blowing smaller size gravel between the ballast and the base of the sleeper. This creates a two-layer ballast bed. Series of large-scale model tests have been carried out to gain a better understanding of the behavior of such a bed under repeated loading. The results confirm that stoneblowing is a better form of track maintenance than the commonly used ballast tamping method, but the size and type of stone and the thickness of the injected layer are of critical importance in determining the postmaintenance behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Key, A. J. ( 1998). “Behaviour of two layer railway track ballast under cyclic and monotonic loading,” PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K.
2.
Lee, K. L., and Vernese, F. J. (1978). “End restraint effects on cyclic triaxial strength of sand.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 104(6), 705–719.
3.
Li, D., and Selig, E. T. (1998). “Method for railroad track foundation design. II: Applications.”J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 124(4), 323–329.
4.
McMichael, P. (1992). “Track maintenance by stoneblower.” J. Pandrol Int., Addlestone, Surrey, U.K., 4–7.
5.
Office of Research and Experiments (ORE). (1970). “Stresses in the rails, the ballast and the formation resulting from traffic loads.” Question D71, Rep. No. 10, European Union of Railways, Utrecht, Holland.
6.
Raymond, G. P., and Bathurst, R. J. ( 1987). “Performance of larger scale model single tie ballast systems.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1131, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 7–13.
7.
Raymond, G. P., and Bathurst, R. J. (1994). “Repeat load response of aggregates in relation to track quality index.” Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, Canada, 31, 547–554.
8.
Sato, Y. (1995). “Japanese studies on deterioration of ballasted track.” Vehicle System Dynamics, Special Supplement 24, 197–208.
9.
Selig, E. T., and Waters, J. M. (1994). Track geotechnology and substructure management. Thomas Telford, London.
10.
Shenton, M. J. (1975). “Deformation of railway ballast under repeated loading conditions.” Proc., Symp. on Railroad Track Mech., Pergamon Press, Tarrytown, N.Y., 405–425.
11.
Shenton, M. J. ( 1985). “Ballast deformation and track deterioration.” Track technology for the next decade. Thomas Telford, London, 253–265.
12.
Timmerman, D. H., and Wu, T. H. (1969). “Behavior of dry sands under cyclic loading.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 95(4), 1097–1112.
13.
Waters, J. M. (1989). “Track renewals using the dynamic track stabilised.” Proc., 3rd RIA Track Sector Course, Railway Industry Association, London, 1, Paper 5.13.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 4 • April 2000
Pages: 317 - 323
History
Received: Apr 6, 1999
Published online: Apr 1, 2000
Published in print: Apr 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.