Predicted and Measured Response of an Integral Abutment Bridge
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 6
Abstract
This project examined several uncertainties of integral abutment bridge design and analysis through field-monitoring of an integral abutment bridge and three levels of numerical modeling. Field monitoring data from a Pennsylvania bridge site was used to refine the numerical models that were then used to predict the integral abutment bridge behavior of other Pennsylvania bridges of similar construction. The instrumented bridge was monitored with 64 gages; monitoring pile strains, soil pressure behind abutments, abutment displacement, abutment rotation, girder rotation, and girder strains during construction and continuously thereafter. Three levels of numerical analysis were performed in order to evaluate prediction methods of bridge behavior. The analysis levels included laterally loaded pile models using commercially available software, two-dimensional (2D) single bent models, and 3D finite element models. In addition, a weather station was constructed within the immediate vicinity of the monitored bridge to capture environmental information including ambient air temperature, solar radiation, wind speed and direction, humidity, rainfall, and barometric pressure. Laterally loaded pile models confirmed that inclusion of multilinear soil springs created from curves is a valid approach for modeling soil–pile interaction within a finite element program. The 2D and 3D numerical models verified the field data indicating that primary accommodation of superstructure expansion and contraction is through rotation of the abutment about its base rather than longitudinal translation, as assumed in the original design of this bridge. Girder axial forces were suspected to be influenced by creep and shrinkage effects in the bridge superstructure. Pile strains were found to be well below strains corresponding to pile plastic moment. Overall, the 2D numerical model and the 3D numerical model predicted very similar behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was sponsored by Penn DOT and the Pennsylvania Transportation Institute.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, (AASHTO). (1989). “Thermal effects in concrete bridge superstructures.” NCHRP Rep. No. 276, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Fennema, J. L. (2003). “Prediction and measured response of integral abutment bridges.” Master of Science thesis, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
Lawver, A., French, C., and Shield, C. K. (2000). “Field performance of an integral abutment bridge.” Transportation Research Record. 1740, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 108–117.
Oesterle, R. G., Refai, T. M., Volz, J. S., Scanlon, A., and Weiss, W. J. (1998). “Jointless and integral abutment bridges analytical research and proposed design procedures.” Rep. No. DTFH61-92-C-00154, Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Reese, L. C. (1985). “Behavior of piles and pile groups under lateral load.” Research Rep. No. FHWA/RD-85/106, Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Wang, S., and Reece, L. C. (1993). “COM624P-Laterally loaded pile analysis program for the microcomputer, Version 2.0.” Rep. No. FHWA-5A-91-048, Office of Technology Applications, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 8, 2003
Accepted: Oct 15, 2004
Published online: Nov 1, 2005
Published in print: Nov 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.