TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2005

Balancing Connectivity of Deteriorating Bridge Networks and Long-Term Maintenance Cost through Optimization

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 4

Abstract

Due to aggressive environmental stressors and increasing traffic loads, highway bridges are undergoing significant deterioration in both condition and safety. Timely and adequate maintenance interventions are therefore crucial to ensure the functionality of existing bridges in a network. Under budget constraints, it is important to prioritize maintenance needs to bridges that are most significant to the functionality of the entire network. In this paper, the network-level bridge maintenance planning problem is posed as a combinatorial optimization and is automated by a genetic algorithm (GA) to select and allocate maintenance interventions of different types among networked bridges as well as over a specified time horizon. Two conflicting objective functions are considered simultaneously: (1) The overall performance of a bridge network expressed by the time-dependent reliability of connectivity between the origin and the destination locations and (2) the present value of total maintenance cost over the specified time horizon. A variety of maintenance types, which differ in unit costs as well as in effects on bridge performance in terms of improvement in structural reliability levels, are used in the optimization. An event tree analysis is carried out to obtain a closed-form expression for the network connectivity reliability. As an illustration example, the GA-based procedure is applied to deteriorating deck slabs of an existing 13-bridge network located in Colorado. It is shown that the proposed maintenance planning procedure has the capability of both prioritizing scarce maintenance needs to deteriorating bridges that are most crucial to the network performance and cost-effectively distributing maintenance interventions over the time horizon.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers gratefully acknowledge the partial financial support of the U.S. National Science Foundation through Grant Nos. NSFCMS-9912525 and NSFCMS-0217290, and the support of the Colorado Department of Transportation. The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.

References

Adey, B., Hajdin, R., and Brühwiler, E. (2003). “Supply and demand system approach to development of bridge management strategies.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(3), 117–131.
Akgül, F. (2002). “Lifetime system reliability prediction for multiple structure types in a bridge network.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
Akgül, F., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Computational platform for predicting lifetime system reliability profiles for different structure types in a network.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 18(2), 92–104.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1998). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 2nd Ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1994). Manual for condition evaluation of bridges, 2nd Ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 16th Ed., Washington, D.C.
Ang, A. H.-S., and Tang, W. H. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Vol. I: Basic principles, Wiley, New York.
Augusti, G., Borri, A., and Ciampoli, M. (1994). “Optimal allocation of resources in reduction of the seismic risks of highway networks.” Eng. Struct., 16(7), 485–497.
Augusti, G., Ciampoli, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (1998). “Optimal planning of retrofitting interventions on bridges in a highway network.” Eng. Struct., 20(11), 933–939.
Basöz, N., and Kiremidjian, A. S. (1995). “Bridge prioritization for emergency responses.” Proc., 4th U.S. Conf. on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, M. J. O’Rourke, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 485–492.
Bell, M. G. H., and Iida, Y. (1997). Transportation network analysis, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Chen, A., Yang, H., Lo, H. K., and Tang, W. H. (2002). “Capacity reliability of a road network: An assessment methodology and numerical results,” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 36(3), 225–252.
Das, P. C. (1999). “Prioritisation of bridge maintenance needs.” Case studies in optimal design and maintenance planning of civil infrastructure systems, D. M. Frangopol, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 26–44.
Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Enright, M. P., and Frangopol, D. M. (1999). “Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using Bayesian updating.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(10), 1118–1125.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (1999). “Repair optimization of highway bridges using system reliability approach.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(7), 766–775.
Estes, A. C., Frangopol, D. M., and Foltz, S. D. (2004). “Updating reliability of steel miter gates on locks and dams using visual inspection results.” Eng. Struct., 26(3), 319–333.
Frangopol, D. M., and Das, P. C. (1999). “Management of bridge stocks based on future reliability and maintenance costs.” Current and future trends in bridge design, construction, and maintenance, P. C. Das, D. M. Frangopol, and A. S. Nowak, eds., Thomas Telford, London, 45–58.
Frangopol, D. M., Enright, M. P., Gharaibeh, E., and Estes, A. C. (1999). “Towards optimal reliability-based bridge maintenance planning.” Case studies in optimal design and maintenance planning of civil infrastructure systems, D. M. Frangopol, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 73–88.
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., and Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). “Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 15(1), 27–34.
Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K.-Y., and Estes, A. C. (1997). “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(10), 1390–1401.
Furuta, H., Kameda, T., Fukuda, Y., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure systems: Life cycle cost vs. safety level vs. service life.” Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Assessment, design and management, D. M. Frangopol, E. Brühwiler, M. H. Faber, and B. Adey, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 19–25.
Hawk, H., and Small, E. P. (1998). “The BRIDGIT bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. (IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland), 8(4), 309–314.
Kong, J. S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Cost-reliability interaction in life-cycle cost optimization of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 130(11), 1704–1712.
Liu, C., Hammad, A., and Itoh, Y. (1997). “Multiobjective optimization of bridge deck rehabilitation using a genetic algorithm.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 12(6), 431–443.
Liu, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2005). “Bridge annual maintenance prioritization under uncertainty by multiobjective combinatorial optimization.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 20(5), 343–353.
Liu, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Optimal bridge maintenance planning based on probabilistic performance prediction.” Eng. Struct., 26(7), 991–1002.
Miyamoto, A., Kawamura, K., and Nakamura, H. (2000). “Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 15, 45–55.
Nicholson, A. J., and Du, Z. P. (1997). “Degradable transportation systems: An integrated equilibrium model.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 31(3), 209–23.
Thoft-Christensen, P. (1995). “Advanced bridge management systems.” Struct. Eng. Rev., 7(3), 151–163.
Thompson, P., Small, E., Johnson, M., and Marshall, A. (1998). “The Pontis bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. (IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland), 8(4), 303–308.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 10Issue 4July 2005
Pages: 468 - 481

History

Received: May 4, 2004
Accepted: Aug 30, 2004
Published online: Jul 1, 2005
Published in print: Jul 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Min Liu, A.M.ASCE
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428. E-mail: [email protected]
Dan M. Frangopol, F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share