Structural Performance of Bridge Approach Slabs under Given Embankment Settlement
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 4
Abstract
Soil embankment settlement causes concrete approach slabs of bridges to lose their contact and support from the soil. When soil settlement occurs, the slab will bend in a concave manner that causes a sudden change in slope grade near its ends. Meanwhile, loads on the slab will also redistribute to the ends of the slab, which may result in faulting across the roadway at the ends of the approach slab. Eventually, the rideability of the bridge approach slab will deteriorate. The current American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials code specifications do not provide clear guidelines to design approach slabs considering the embankment settlements. State Departments of Transportation are spending millions of dollars each year to deal with problems near the ends of approach slabs. To investigate the effect of embankment settlements on the performance of the approach slab, a three-dimensional finite element analysis was conducted in the present study, considering the interaction between the approach slab and the embankment soil, and consequently the separation of the slab and soil. The predicted internal moments of the approach slab provide design engineers with a scientific basis to properly design the approach slab considering different levels of embankment settlements. A proper design of the approach slab will help mitigate the rideability problems of the slab.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers appreciate the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LaDOTD) for financially supporting this project (Project No. 736-99-1149/03-4GT) through the Louisiana Transportation Research Center. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the LaDOTD. In addition, the writers appreciate the very constructive comments from the three reviewers.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1998). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2002). Standard specifications for highway bridges, Washington, D.C.
Briaud, J. L., James, R. W., and Hoffman, S. B. (1997). “Settlement of bridge approaches (the bump at the end of the bridge).” NCHRP Synthesis 234, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Chini, S. A., Wolde-Tinsae, A. M., and Aggour, M. S., (1992). “Drainage and backfill provisions for approaches to bridges.” Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
Ha, H., Seo, J. B., and Briaud, J. L. (2003). “Investigation of settlement at bridge approach slab expansion joint: Survey and site investigations.” Rep. No. 4147-1, to the Texas Department of Transportation, published by the Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System, College Station, Tex.
Hoppe, E. J. (1999). “Guidelines for the use, design, and construction of bridge approach slabs.” Final Rep. No. VTRC 00-R4, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Va.
Kramer, S. L., and Sajer, P. (1991). “Bridge approach slab effectiveness.” Washington State Transportation Center, Seattle.
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LaDOTD). (2002). Bridge design metric manual, Baton Rouge, La.
Mahmood, I. U. (1990). “Evaluation of causes of bridge approach settlement and development of settlement prediction models.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla.
Seo, J. B., Ha, H., and Briaud, J. L. (2003). “Investigation of settlement at bridge approach slab expansion joint: Numerical simulations and model tests,” Rep. No. 4147-2, to the Texas Department of Transportation, published by the Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System, College Station, Tex.
Stark, T. D., Olson, S. M., and Long, J. H. (1995). “Differential movement at the embankment/structure interface: Mitigation and rehabilitation.” Rep. No. IAB-H1, FY 93, Illinois Dept. of Transportation, Springfield, Ill.
Stewart, C. F. (1985). “Highway structure approaches.” California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
Tadros, M. K., and Benak, J. V. (1989). “Bridge abutment and approach slab settlement (Phase 1).” Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb.
Wahls, H. E. (1990). “Design and construction of bridge approaches.” Rep. No. NCHRP Synthesis 159, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Zaman, M., Gopalasingam, A., and Laguros, J. G. (1991). “Consolidation settlement of bridge approach foundation.” J. Geotech. Eng., 117(2), 219–240.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 17, 2004
Accepted: Jul 20, 2004
Published online: Jul 1, 2005
Published in print: Jul 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.