Effect of Changing Truck Weight Regulations on U.S. Bridge Network
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
Historically, truck weight regulations have maintained controls on axle and gross weights with legal load formulas based on limiting allowable stresses in certain types of bridges. These stress limitations do not usually lead to consistent or defensible reliability levels and also ignore the impact of the weight regulation on the existing highway bridge network. This paper is the second part of a two-paper series. The companion paper by the first writer illustrated how new truck weight regulations can be developed to provide an acceptable reliability level. The target reliability level was derived from bridge structures designed to satisfy AASHTO standard design specifications that showed safe and adequate performance levels under current truck loading conditions. In this part of the two-paper series, a deterministic load capacity evaluation as well as a reliability assessment are performed to review the consequences of adapting such regulations on the existing U.S. bridge network. A sensitivity analysis shows how changes in the safety criteria used to develop the truck weight regulations would affect the existing bridge network. Detailed load capacity evaluations and reliability analyses also are performed on a representative sample of bridges to provide specific examples of expected changes in rating and safety levels if the proposed truck weight regulation is to be adopted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1983). Manual for maintenance inspection of bridges, Washington, D.C.
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges, Washington, D.C.
3.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1998). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, D.C.
4.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. ( 1998). “Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures.” Rep. No. 406, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
5.
Ghosn, M., Schilling, C. S., Moses, F., and Runco, G. ( 1995). “Bridge overstress criteria.” FHWA-RD-92-082, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
6.
Ghosn, M. (2000). “Development of truck weight regulations using bridge reliability model.”J. Bridge Engrg., ASCE, 5(4), 293–303.
7.
James, R. W., Noel, J. S., Furr, L. H., and Bonilla, F. E. ( 1985). “Proposed new truck weight formula.” Publ. No. FHWA/RD-85/088, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
8.
Kulicki, J. M. ( 1990). “Development of comprehensive bridge specification and commentary.” NCHRP 12-33, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
9.
Moses, F. ( 1988). “Effects on bridges of alternative truck configurations and weights.” Rep. to Transportation Research Board Truck Weight Study Committee, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
10.
Moses, F., and Verma, D. ( 1987). “Load capacity evaluation of existing bridges.” Rep. No. 301, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
11.
Nowak, A. S. ( 1993). “Calibration of LRFD bridge design code.” Rep. to NCHRP 13-33, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
12.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). ( 1990). “Truck weight limits: Issues and options.” Spec. Rep. 225, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 4 • November 2000
Pages: 304 - 310
History
Received: Jun 19, 1997
Published online: Nov 1, 2000
Published in print: Nov 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.