TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 2000

Development of Truck Weight Regulations Using Bridge Reliability Model

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Historically, truck regulations have maintained controls on axle and gross weights with legal load formulas based on limiting allowable stresses in certain types of bridges. These stress limitations do not usually lead to consistent or defensible safety levels and also ignore the cost impact of the weight regulation on the national bridge network. This paper illustrates how new truck weight regulations can be developed to provide acceptable safety levels. Target safety levels are derived from existing AASHTO bridge evaluation and rating procedures applied to structures showing adequate performance levels. Reliability indices are used to relate the statistics of bridge load effects, based on either existing or proposed truck weight regulations, to the dynamic behavior and resistance variables of existing bridges. The sensitivity of the results to various assumptions and errors in the database is also analyzed. An accompanying paper reviews the consequences of adapting such a formula on the safety of existing bridges. The deterministic analysis as well as a reliability assessment are performed in the accompanying paper to review the consequences of adapting such regulations on the U.S. bridge network using the National Bridge Inventory files.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Agrawal, A. C. ( 1978). “Vehicle weight regulations across Canada: A technical review with respect to the capacity of highway systems.” RR214, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Ontario, Canada.
2.
Agrawal, A. C. ( 1997). “Impact on the highway infrastructure of existing and alternative vehicle configurations and weight limits.” Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
3.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1994). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, D.C.
4.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 16th Ed., Washington, D.C.
5.
Bjorhovde, R., Galambos, T. V., and Ravindra, M. K. (1978). “LRFD criteria for steel beam-columns.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1371–1387.
6.
Cooper, P. B., Galambos, T. V., and Ravindra, M. K. (1978). “LRFD criteria for plate girders.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1389–1407.
7.
Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A. ( 1980). “Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard, A58.” NBS Spec. Publ. 577, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
8.
Fisher, J. W., Galambos, T. V., Kulak, G. L., and Ravindra, M. K. (1978). “Load and resistance factor design criteria for connectors.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1427–1441.
9.
Galambos, T. V., Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A. (1982). “Probability based load criteria: Assessment of current design practice.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108(5), 959–977.
10.
Galambos, T. V., and Ravindra, M. K. (1978). “Properties of steel for use in LRFD.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1459–1468.
11.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. ( 1984). “Bridge load modeling and reliability analysis.” Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
12.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. ( 1998). “Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures.” NCHRP Rep. 406, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
13.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. (2000). “Effect of changing truck weight regulations on U.S. bridge network.”J. Bridge Engrg., ASCE, 5(4), 304–310.
14.
Ghosn, M., Moses, F., and Gobieski, J. ( 1986). “Evaluation of steel bridges using in-service testing.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1072, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 71–78.
15.
Ghosn, M., Schilling, C. S., Moses, F., and Runco, G. ( 1995). “Bridge overstress criteria.” FHWA-RD-92-082, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
16.
Goble, G. G., et al. ( 1991). “Load prediction and structural response.” Rep. to Federal Highway Administration, Dept. of Civ., Envir., and Arch. Engrg., University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
17.
Hansell, W. C., Galambos, T. V., Ravindra, M. K., and Viest, I. M. (1978). “Composite beam criteria in LRFD.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1409–1426.
18.
Hansell, W. C., and Viest, I. M. ( 1971). “Load factor design for steel highway bridges.” Engrg. J., 8(4), 113–123.
19.
Harman, D. J. ( 1985). “Surveys of commercial vehicles weights: 1975 to 1982.” RR236, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Ontario, Canada.
20.
Imbsen, R. A., Liu, D. A., Schamber R. A., and Nutt, R. V. ( 1987). “Strength evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges.” NCHRP Rep. 292, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
21.
James, R. W., Noel, J. S., Furr, L. H., and Bonilla, F. E. ( 1985). “Proposed new truck weight formula.” Publ. No. FHWA/RD-85/088, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
22.
James, R. W., Noel, J. S., Furr, H. L., and Bonilla, F. E. (1986). “Proposed new truck weight limit formula.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 112(7), 1589–1604.
23.
Kulicki, J. M. ( 1990). “Development of comprehensive bridge specification and commentary.” NCHRP 12-33, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
24.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M. ( 1983). “Instrumentation for weighing trucks-in-motion for highway bridge loads.” Publ. No. FHWA/OH-83/001, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio.
25.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M. ( 1985). “A comprehensive study of bridge loads and reliability.” Publ. No. FHWA/OH-85/005, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio.
26.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M. (1987). “Discussion on proposed new truck weight limit formula.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(11), 2330–2331.
27.
Moses, F., Schilling, C. G., and Raju, K. S. ( 1987). “Fatigue evaluation procedures for steel bridges. NCHRP Rep. No. 299, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
28.
Moses, F., and Verma, D. ( 1987). “Load capacity evaluation of existing bridges.” Rep. No. 301, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
29.
Nowak, A. S. ( 1993). “Calibration of LRFD bridge design code.” NCHRP Project 12-33, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
30.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications. ( 1983). Ontario highway bridge design code and commentary, Toronto.
31.
Ravindra, M. K., Cornell, C. A., and Galambos, T. V. (1978). “Wind and snow load factors for use in LRFD.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1443–1457.
32.
Ravindra, M. K., and Galambos, T. V. (1978). “Load and resistance factor design for steel.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1337–1353.
33.
Thoft-Christensen, P., and Baker, M. K. ( 1982). Structural reliability theory and its applications, Springer, New York.
34.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). ( 1990). “Truck weight limits: Issues and options.” Spec. Rep. 225, Washington, D.C.
35.
Yura, J. A., Galambos, T. V., and Ravindra, M. K. (1978). “The bending resistance of steel beams.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1355–1370.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5Issue 4November 2000
Pages: 293 - 303

History

Received: Jun 19, 1997
Published online: Nov 1, 2000
Published in print: Nov 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michel Ghosn
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., City Coll. of New York, New York, NY 10031.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share