Effects of Impervious Area Estimation Methods on Simulated Peak Discharges
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 4
Abstract
In this paper, the variability of simulated flood discharges is evaluated using two methods for estimating impervious surfaces and common design methods in the Mission Creek watershed located in Santa Barbara, Calif. The two impervious estimation methods are characterized as high resolution from manually digitizing aerial photographs and medium resolution from automated interpretation of satellite data. In all cases, the high resolution fraction of impervious area is greater than the medium resolution. The difference between methods is greatest in urban regions having either small or large fractions of imperviousness (low- or high-intensity development). The largest difference observed at the modeling unit scale was 19 percentage points (26 versus 45%). To quantify discharge variability, four events (2- and for 6- and durations) and three models were used. The models used combinations of Green-Ampt and curve number (CN) losses and kinematic wave and unit hydrograph routing. The Green-Ampt model tended to overpredict peak discharge relative to the CN model, and kinematic wave routing and unit hydrograph agreed well except for the largest events, where the efficiency of the routing decreased travel time sufficiently to increase the peak discharge. The CN model was more sensitive to the impervious surface estimation method relative to the Green-Ampt model due to the mechanisms for incorporating imperviousness into the models. At the scale of the watershed used in this study, the effects of imperviousness estimation method on simulated peak discharge ranges from 16% for the event to 9% for the event. While the effects are present, they are not sufficient to shift the recurrence interval of the design discharges. At the model unit scale, the difference in peak discharge between impervious estimation methods exceeded 41 and 21% for the 2- and events, respectively. Overall, the two impervious surface estimation methods result in different peak discharges but neither method consistently results in discharges less than flood frequency-based discharges. In terms of design risk, the results suggest that the design methods are sufficient to absorb the imperviousness variability from the two methods used here. For applications where a model is calibrated to a specific event, variability resulting from differences in estimation methods is likely to be further muted by adjusting model parameters in the calibration process.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted as part of the Santa Barbara Channel–Long Term Ecological Research Project supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. NSFOCE-9982105).
References
Arnold, C. A., Jr., and Gibbons, C. J. (1996). “Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key urban environmental indicator.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 62(2), 243–258.
Beighley, R. E., Melack, J. M., and Dunne, T. (2003). “Impacts of California’s climate regimes and coastal land use change on streamflow characteristics.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(6), 1419–1433.
Canters, F., Chormanski, J., de Voorde, T. V., and Batelaan, O. (2006). “Effects of different methods for estimating impervious surface cover on runoff estimation at catchment level.” Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, M. Caetano and M. Painho, eds., 557–566.
Civco, D. L., and Hurd, J. D. (1997). “Impervious surface mapping for the State of Connecticut.” Proc. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Conf., 124–135.
Dougherty, M., Dymond, R. L., Goetz, S. J., Jantz, C. A., and Goulet, N. (2004). “Evaluation of impervious surface estimates in a rapidly urbanizing watershed.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(11), 1275–1284.
Draper, S. E., and Rao, S. G. (1986). “Runoff prediction using remote sensing imagery.” Water Resour. Bull., 22(6), 941–949.
Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
Hawkins, R. H., Hjelmfelt, A. T., and Zevenbergen, A. W. (1985). “Runoff probability, storm depth and curve numbers.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 111(4), 330–340.
Homer, C., Huang, C., Yang, L., Wylie, B., and Coan, M. (2004). “Development of a 2001 national landcover database for the United States.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(7), 829–840.
Huang, C., and Townshend, J. R. G. (2003). “A stepwise regression tree for nonlinear approximation: Applications to estimating sub-pixel land cover.” Int. J. Remote Sens., 24(1), 75–90.
Ji, M., and Jensen, J. R. (1999). “Effectiveness of subpixel analysis in detecting and quantifying urban imperviousness from Landsat thematic mapper imagery.” Geocarto Int., 14(4), 33–41.
Kauffman, G. J., and Brant, T. (2000). “The role of impervious cover as a watershed based zoning tool to protect water quality in the Christina River Basin of Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Maryland.” Proc., of Watershed Management 2000, 1–16.
Lee, J. G., and Heaney, J. P. (2003). “Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(5), 419–426.
Moglen, G. E., and Beighley, R. E. (2000). “Using GIS to determine the extent of gaged streams in a region.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(2), 190–196.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2001). “Sulphur mountain doppler radar: A performance study.” Technical Memorandum NWS WR-267, National Weather Service, Los Angeles Weather Service, Oxnard, Calif.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2007). “Precipitation-frequency atlas No. 2 of the western United States.” ⟨http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ohd/hdsc/noaaatlas2.htm⟩ (Nov. 2007).
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2007). “United States Dept. of Agriculture, state soil geographic (STATSGO) database for California.” ⟨http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov⟩ (Sept. 2007).
Pappas, E. A., Smith, D. R., Huang, C., Shuster, W. D., and Bonta, J. V. (2008). “Impervious surface impacts to runoff and sediment discharge under laboratory rainfall simulation.” Catena, 72, 146–152.
Putnam, A. L. (1972). “Effect of urban development on floods in the Piedmont Province of North Carolina.” Open-File Rep., United States Geological Survey.
Ridd, M. K. (1995). “Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: Comparative anatomy for cities.” Int. J. Remote Sens., 16(12), 2165–2185.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Miller, N. (1983). “Green-Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 109(1), 62–70.
Sauer, V. B., Thomas, W. O., Jr., Stricker, V. A., and Wilson, K. V. (1983). “Flood characteristics of urban watersheds in the United States.” USGS Water Supply Paper No. 2207, Reston, Va.
San Diego County (SDC). (2003). Hydrology Manual, Dept. of Public Works, San Diego, Calif., ⟨http://www.co.san-diego.ca.us/dpw/engineer/hydrologymanual.html⟩ (Oct. 2007).
Santa Barbara County Planning and Development (SBCPD). (2000). “Santa Barbara County 2030 land and population: The potential effects of population growth on urban and rural lands.” Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara, Calif.
Schueler, T. R. (1994). “The importance of imperviousness.” Watershed Protection Tech., 1(3), 100–110.
State of California, Dept. of Finance (CADOF). (2007). “Population projections for California and its counties 2000–2050, Sacramento, California.” ⟨http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/ReportsPapers/Projections/P1/P1.php⟩ (Nov. 2007).
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1998). HEC-1 flood hydrograph package user’s manual, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif.
United Nations. (2006). World urbanization prospects, the 2005 revision, Population Division, Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Publications, New York.
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA). (2004). “Natural resources conservation service, national engineering handbook, part 630.” Hydrology, ⟨http://www.wsi.nrcs.usda.gov/products/W2Q/H&H/tech_refs_eng_Hbk/chap.html⟩ (Nov. 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2007a). “National elevation dataset.” ⟨http://gisdata.usgs.net/ned/⟩ (Sept. 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2007b). “National hydrography dataset, medium resolution.” ⟨http://nhd.usgs.gov/⟩ (Sept. 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2007c). “National land cover database 2001.” ⟨http://www.mrlc.gov/index.asp⟩ (Sept. 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2007d). “USGS surface-water data for California.” ⟨http://waterdata.usgs.gov/ca/nwis/sw⟩ (Sept. 2007).
Verdin, K. L., and Verdin, J. P. (1999). “A topological system for delineation and codification of the Earth’s river basins.” J. Hydrol., 218, 1–12.
Wang, Y., and Zhang, X. (2004). “A SPLIT model for extraction of subpixel impervious surface information.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(7), 821–828.
Wu, C., and Murray, A. T. (2003). “Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis.” Remote Sens. Environ., 84, 493–505.
Yang, L., Huang, C., Homer, C. A., Wylie, B. K., and Coan, M. J. (2003). “An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: Synergistic use of landsat-7 and high spatial resolution imagery.” Can. J. Remote Sens., 29, 230–240.
Yang, X., and Liu, Z. (2005). “Use of satellite-derived landscape imperviousness index to characterize urban spatial growth. Computers.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 29, 524–540.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 29, 2008
Accepted: May 15, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.