TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2009

Retention Capacity: A Metric to Link Stream Ecology and Storm-Water Management

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 4

Abstract

A major impact on stream ecosystems in urban catchments is the increased frequency of runoff of poor quality storm water. This problem has not been commonly addressed in storm-water management, which usually focuses on pollutant load reduction or abatement of peak flows, or in some cases on minimization of impervious area. If stream ecosystems are to be restored or protected, a greater focus is required on the minimization of hydraulic connection between impervious surfaces and streams for small, frequent rain events. We propose new objectives for storm-water management. We suggest a primary objective of zero directly connected imperviousness for catchments where the ecological objective is to protect stream ecosystems, because the direct connection between impervious surfaces and streams is a severe stressor to stream ecosystems. We then propose an index to quantify the degree of connection of impervious surfaces, scaled to runoff frequency (retention capacity, RC), which can be used as a design objective for treatment measures. RC can be combined with total imperviousness to calculate attenuated imperviousness, analogous to effective imperviousness, but with an objective quantification of the degree of disconnection of impervious surfaces. RC emphasizes the importance of mimicking natural runoff behavior, with the greatest emphasis on small, frequent storms, to reduce the frequency of flow disturbance experienced by streams closer to the preurban frequency. It provides a practical design objective for storm-water treatment systems, which is better targeted toward the protection of stream ecosystems than the pollutant load or runoff volume reduction targets which are commonly used.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank Dr. Glenn Moglen for inviting them to contribute to this paper. His comments and those of three anonymous reviewers have greatly improved it. C. J. W. was funded by Melbourne Water.

References

Alley, W. M., and Veenhuis, J. E. (1983). “Effective impervious area in urban runoff modeling.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 109, 313–319.
Arnold, C. L., Jr., and Gibbons, C. J. (1996). “Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 62(2), 243–258.
Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ANZECC and ARMCANZ). (2000). National water quality management strategy. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality, Vol. 1, The guidelines, Canberra, Australia.
Beach, D. (2001). “Coastal sprawl. The effects of urban design on aquatic ecosystems in the United States.” Pews Ocean Commission, Arlington, Va., ⟨http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Protecting_ocean_life/env_pew_oceans_sprawl.pdf⟩.
Beven, K. J. (2001). Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer, Wiley, New York.
Bhaduri, B., Harbor, J., Engel, B., and Grove, M. (2000). “Assessing watershed-scale, long-term hydrologic impacts of land-use change using a GIS-NPS model.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 26(6), 643–658.
Booth, D. B., and Jackson, C. R. (1997). “Urbanization of aquatic systems—Degradation thresholds, stormwater detention, and the limits of mitigation.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 33(5), 1077–1090.
Booth, D. B., Karr, J. R., Schauman, S., Konrad, C. P., Morley, S. A., Larson, M. G., and Burges, S. J. (2004). “Reviving urban streams: Land use, hydrology, biology, and human behavior.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(5), 1351–1364.
Boyd, M. J., Bufill, M. C., and Kness, R. M. (1993). “Pervious and impervious runoff in urban catchments.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 38(6), 463–478.
Boyd, M. J., Bufill, M. C., and Kness, R. M. (1994). “Predicting pervious and impervious storm runoff from urban drainage basins.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 39(4), 321–332.
Brabec, E., Schulte, S., and Richards, P. L. (2002). “Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning.” J. Plan. Lit., 16(4), 499–514.
Bratières, K., Fletcher, T. D., Deletic, A., and Zinger, Y. (2008). “Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: A large-scale design optimisation study.” Water Res.42(14), 3930–3940.
Carlson, T. N., and Arthur, S. T. (2000). “The impact of land use–land cover changes due to urbanization on surface microclimate and hydrology: A satellite perspective.” Glob. Planet. Change, 25(1–2), 49–65.
Center for Watershed Protection. (2003). Impacts of impervious cover on aquatic ecosystems, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, Md.
Chessman, B. C. (1995). “Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index.” Aust. J. Ecol., 20(1), 122–129.
Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA Victoria). (2003). “Biological objectives for rivers and streams—Ecosystem protection.” 793.1, Melbourne, Australia.
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2008). “Hydraulic and treatment performance of fine media stormwater filters.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 2535–2541.
Helfield, J. M., and Diamond, M. L. (1997). “Use of constructed wetlands for urban stream restoration: A critical analysis.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 21(3), 329–341.
Hollis, G. E., and Ovenden, J. C. (1988). “The quantity of stormwater runoff from ten stretches of road, a car park and eight roofs in Hertfordshire, England during 1983.” Hydrolog. Process., 2, 227–243.
Jennings, D. B., and Jarnagin, S. T. (2002). “Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: A historical perspective in a Mid-Atlantic subwatershed.” Landscape Ecol., 17(5), 471–489.
Ladson, A. R., Lloyd, S., Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., and Horton, P. (2007). “Scenarios for redesigning an urban drainage system to reduce runoff frequency and restore stream ecological condition.” Water Pract. Technol., 2(2).
Ladson, A. R., Walsh, C. J., and Fletcher, T. D. (2006). “Improving stream health in urban areas by reducing runoff frequency from impervious surfaces.” Aust. J. Water. Resour., 10(2), 23–33.
Lee, J. G., and Heaney, J. P. (2003). “Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(5), 419–426.
Leopold, L. B. (1968). Hydrology for urban land planning—A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use, 554, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Meyer, S. C. (2005). “Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA.” Hydrogeol. J., 13(5–6), 871–885.
Moss, A. J., Smith, M. J., Harch, B. D., Bunn, S. E., Storey, A. W., Kennard, M. J., and Marshall, C. J. (2001). “Ecosystem health guidelines for rivers and streams in south east Queensland.” Design and Implementation of Baseline Monitoring (DIBM3): Developing an Ecosystem Health Monitoring Program for Rivers and Streams in Southeast Queensland, Final Rep. to the Southeast Queensland Regional Water Quality Managment Strategy, M. J. Smith and A. W. Storey, eds., Brisbane, Australia, 12.1–12.34.
Norris, R. H., and Thoms, M. C. (1999). “What is river health?” Freshwater Biol., 41(2), 197–209.
Ourso, R. T., and Frenzel, S. A. (2003). “Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage.” Hydrobiologia, 501(1–3), 117–131.
Paul, M. J., and Meyer, J. L. (2001). “Streams in the urban landscape.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32, 333–365.
Pezzaniti, D., Argue, J. R., and Johnston, L. (2002). “Detention/retention storages for peak flow reduction in urban catchments: Effects of spatial deployment of storages.” Aust. J. Water. Resour., 7(2), 131–137.
Read, J., Wevill, T., Fletcher, T., and Deletic, A. (2008). “Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems.” Water Res., 42(4–5), 893–902.
Schueler, T. R. (1994). “The importance of imperviousness.” Watershed Protection Techniques, 1(3), 100–111.
Shuster, W., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., and Smith, D. (2005). “Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review.” Urban Water, 2(4), 263–275.
Suren, A. M. (2000). “Effects of urbanisation.” New Zealand stream invertebrates: Implications for management, K. J. Collier and M. J. Winterbourn, eds., New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchurch, New Zealand, 260–288.
Taylor, G. D., Fletcher, T. D., Wong, T. H. F., and Duncan, H. P. (2006). “Baseflow water quality behaviour: Implications for wetland performance monitoring.” Aust. J. Water. Resour., 10(3), 293–302.
Taylor, S. L., Roberts, S. C., Walsh, C. J., and Hatt, B. E. (2004). “Catchment urbanisation and increased benthic algal biomass in streams: Linking mechanisms to management.” Freshwater Biol., 49(6), 835–851.
Thurston, H. W., Goddard, H. C., Szlag, D., and Lemberg, B. (2003). “Controlling storm-water runoff with tradable allowances for impervious surfaces.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(5), 409–418.
Victoria Stormwater Committee. (1999). Urban stormwater: Best practice environmental management guidelines, CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
Walsh, C. J. (2004). “Protection of in-stream biota from urban impacts: Minimise catchment imperviousness or improve drainage design?” Z. Gerontol. Geriatr., 55(3), 317–326.
Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., and Ladson, A. R. (2005a). “Stream restoration in urban catchments through re-designing stormwater systems: Looking to the catchment to save the stream.” J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24(3), 690–705.
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., and Morgan, R. P. (2005b). “The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure.” J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24(3), 706–723.
Wang, L., and Kanehl, P. (2003). “Influences of watershed urbanization and instream habitat on macroinvertebrates in cold water systems.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(5), 1181–1196.
Wilkenfield, G. (2006). “Water saving requirements for new residential buildings in Victoria: Options for flexible compliance.” Rep. for Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, George Wilkenfield and Associates, Melbourne, Australia.
Wissmar, R. C., Timm, R. K., and Logsdon, M. G. (2004). “Effects of changing forest and impervious land covers on discharge characteristics of watersheds.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 34(1), 91–98.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14Issue 4April 2009
Pages: 399 - 406

History

Received: Jan 31, 2008
Accepted: May 16, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher J. Walsh [email protected]
Principal Research Fellow, Dept. of Resource Management and Geography, The Univ. of Melbourne, 221 Bouverie St., Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Tim D. Fletcher
Director, Institute for Sustainable Water Resources, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Building 60, Monash Univ., Victoria 3800, Australia.
Anthony R. Ladson
Senior Lecturer, Institute for Sustainable Water Resources, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Building 60, Monash Univ., Victoria 3800, Australia; presently, Senior Hydrologist, Sinclair Knight Merz, 590 Orrong Rd., Armadale, Victoria 3143, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share