River Flow Prediction Using an Integrated Approach
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 1
Abstract
River flow predictions are needed in many water resource management activities. Hydrologists have relied on individual techniques such as time series, conceptual, or artificial neural networks (ANNs) to model the complex rainfall-runoff process in the past. These techniques, when used individually, provide reasonable accuracy in modeling and forecasting river flow. This paper presents an integrated approach for river flow prediction in an attempt to achieve better forecast accuracy. Specifically, three different models are presented for daily river flow prediction: a time series model of autoregressive type, a nonlinear conceptual model, and an integrated model. The conceptual model uses the Green-Ampt method to model infiltration, time area method to translate rainfall input in time, and a nonlinear reservoir for flood routing. The integrated model uses conceptual, ANN, genetic algorithm, data-decomposition, and model-fusion techniques. The data derived from the Kentucky River basin were employed to calibrate and validate all the models. A wide variety of standard performance indices was used to evaluate model performance. The performance of the time series model was found to be the worst and the conceptual model was found to perform reasonably well. The integrated model performed the best, demonstrating a need for developing innovative hybrid models capable of exploiting advantages of individual techniques in order to achieve improved accuracies in short-term river flow forecasting.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Anctil, F., and Tape, D. G. (2004). “An exploration of artificial neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting combined with wavelet decomposition.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 3(1), S121–S128.
Birikundavyi, S., Labib, R., Trung, H. T., and Rousselle, J. (2002). “Performance of neural networks in daily streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(5), 392–398.
Campolo, M., Andreussi, P., and Soldati, A. (1999). “River flood forecasting with neural network model.” Water Resour. Res., 35(4), 1191–1197.
Chen, J., and Adams, B. J. (2005). “Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol., 318(1–4), 232–249.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Curry, B., and Morgan, P. (1997). “Neural network: A need for caution.” Omega–Int. J. Manage. Sci., 25(1), 123–133.
Dawson, D. W., and Wilby, R. (1998). “An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 43(1), 47–65.
Deb, K. (2001). “An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 186, 311–338.
Deb, K., and Agarwal, R. B. (1995). “Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space.” Complex Syst., 9, 115–148.
Deb, K., and Goyal, M. (1996). “A combined genetic adaptive search (GeneAS) for engineering design.” Comput. Sci. Inform., 26(4), 30–45.
Haan, C. T. (1972). “A water yield model for small watersheds.” Water Resour. Res., 8(1), 58–69.
Hsu, K.-L., Gupta, H. V., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., and Imam, B. (2002). “Self-organizing linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1302 .
Hsu, K.-L., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process.” Water Resour. Res., 31(10), 2517–2530.
Hydrologic Engineering Center. (1990). HEC-1 flood hydrograph package user’s manual and programmer’s manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, Calif.
Jain, A., and Indurthy, S. K. V. P. (2003). “Comparative analysis of event based rainfall-runoff modeling techniques—Deterministic, statistical, and artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 8(2), 1–6.
Jain, A., and Kumar, A. (2006). “An evaluation of artificial neural network technique for the determination of infiltration model parameters.” J. Appl. Soft Comput., 6(3), 272–282.
Jain, A., and Kumar, A. M. (2007). “Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting.” J. Appl. Soft Comput., 7(2), 585–592.
Jain, A., and Ormsbee, L. E. (2002). “Evaluation of short-term water demand forecast modeling techniques: Conventional methods versus AI.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 94(7), 64–72.
Jain, A., and Ormsbee, L. E. (2004). “An evaluation of the available techniques for estimating missing fecal coliform data.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(6), 1617–1630.
Jain, A., and Srinivasulu, S. (2004). “Development of effective and efficient rainfall-runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded GA, and ANN techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 40(4), W04302.
Jain, A., and Srinivasulu, S. (2006). “Integrated approach to modelling decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques.” J. Hydrol., 317(3–4), 291–306.
Jain, A., Varshney, A. K., and Joshi, U. C. (2001). “Short-term water demand forecast modeling at IIT Kanpur using artificial neural networks.” Water Resour. Manage., 15(5), 299–321.
Kumar, J., Jain, A., and Srivastava, R. (2006). “Neural network based solutions for locating groundwater pollution sources.” Hydrol. J., 29(1–2), 55–66.
Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C. (2000). “Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: A review of modeling issues and applications.” Environ. Modell. Software, 15, 101–124.
Minns, A. W., and Hall, M. J. (1996). “Artificial neural networks as rainfall runoff models.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 41(3), 399–417.
Mizumara, K. (1995). “Runoff prediction by simple tank model using recession curves.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 121(11), 812–817.
Porporato, A., and Ridolfi, L. (2001). “Multivariate nonlinear prediction of river flows.” J. Hydrol., 248, 109–122.
Raman, H., and Sunilkumar, N. (1995). “Multivariate modeling of water resources time series using artificial neural networks.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 40(2), 145–163.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J. (1986). “Learning representations by back-propagating errors.” Nature, 323, 533–536.
Sajikumar, N., and Thandaveswara, B. S. (1999). “A non-linear rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network.” J. Hydrol., 216, 32–55.
Shamseldin, A. Y. (1997). “Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol., 199, 272–294.
Smith, J., and Eli, R. N. (1995). “Neural network models of the rainfall runoff process.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 121(6), 499–508.
Srinivasulu, S., and Jain, A. (2006). “A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall-runoff modeling.” J. Appl. Soft Comput., 6(3), 295–306.
Tokar, A. S., and Markus, M. (2000). “Precipitation runoff modeling using artificial neural network and conceptual models.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(2), 156–161.
Zhang, B., and Govindaraju, S. (2000). “Prediction of watershed runoff using bayesian concepts and modular neural networks.” Water Resour. Res., 36(3), 753–762.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2006
Accepted: Apr 25, 2008
Published online: Jan 1, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.