Tests of Concepts for Streamflow Sampler Design
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 1
Abstract
Total-load sampling has been a perpetual problem in sediment monitoring. Usually a combination of bed-load sampling devices, suspended load suction samplers, and some kind of flume, for total flow rate, is used. Total-load, sediment-sampler-design concepts that can perform all three of these functions are proposed. The resulting designs would require installation at sites that can provide a step-overfall height about equal to the maximum channel flow depth. The concepts are simple, but appear to have been overlooked or ignored for the past many decades, and are based on a moving conveyor belt that is long and wide, with many slots, all of the same size, onto which the stream to be sampled discharges. All flow drops through the slots, and with equal sized slots each must catch a similar proportion of the total flow. Hence, only one slot needs to be collected. As a practical extension it is proposed to replace the conveyor belt with a rack having several slots that represent a short section of the total conveyor belt that is large enough so that the flow does not notice the missing belt parts. This rack is then traversed back and forth on a track through the falling nappe. Laboratory tests of this proposed sampling-assembly rack indicated that the number of the required slots is related to the channel depth and the sum of the slot openings. When the rack is composed of sufficient slots so that the slot-width sum is more than half the channel overfall depth, the system undersampled from 0 to 2% but when there are insufficient slots whose sum represents less than one-third of the overfall depth, the system undersampled by over 8%. The concepts are extended to the condition with a stopped belt where several sampling-slot groups are equally spaced beneath the overfall. A “test of concept” sampler assembly of the stopped-belt idea was built and tested. The sample catch across the stream was within about 4% of expected, offering a total load sampling system where motorized equipment is difficult to install, or electric power is not available. Design and construction suggestions are presented. The catch rate can be small enough to facilitate convenient flow measurement of the catch, which can be converted to total streamflow without the need for separate channel flow measurements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writer thankfully acknowledges the laboratory assistance of Trathferd (Skip) Eshelman and Allan Knopf for the collection of the laboratory data and important observations of the flow behaviors that were vital in explaining the test results and establishing the validity of the concepts.
References
ASCE. (1969). Sediment measurement techniques: A. Fluvial sediment, Task Committee on Preparation of Sedimentation Manual Committee of the Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 95, HY5, 1477–1514 (subsequently part of Manual 54, sedimentation engineering).
Barnes, K. K., and Frevert, R. K. (1954). “A runoff sampler for large watersheds. Part I. Laboratory studies.” Agric. Eng., 35(2), 88–90.
Barnes, K. K., and Johnson, H. P. (1956). “A runoff sampler for large watersheds. Part 2. Field installations.” Agric. Eng., 37(12), 813–815, 824.
Brown, H. E., Hansen, E. A., and Champaigne, N. E., Jr. (1970). “A system for measuring total sediment yield from small watersheds.” Water Resour. Res., 6(3), 818–825.
Clemmens, A. J., Wahl, T. L., Bos, M. G., and Replogle, J. A. (2001). “Water measurement with flumes and weirs.” Publication No. 58, Int. Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Dendy, F. E. (1973). “Traversing-slot runoff sampler for small watersheds.” ARS-S-15, U.S. Sedimentation Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service (Southern Region), USDA, Oxford Miss.
Parsons, D. A. (1954). “Coshocton-type runoff samplers.” SCS-TP-124, Laboratory Investigations, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.
Parsons, D. A. (1955). “Coshocton-type runoff samplers.” Supplementary Laboratory, Investigations at the Stillwater, Oklahoma Outdoor Hydraulics Laboratory, ARS-41-2, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.
Renard, K. G., Simanton, J. R., and Donica, L. E. (1976). “A time related automatic total-load sediment sampler.” Proc., Third Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conf., Symp. 7, U.S. Government Printing Office, PB 245 100, Washington, D.C., 17–29.
Replogle, J. A., and El-Swaify, S. A. (1985). “Design and construction considerations for sediment sampling of streamflows.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Soil Erosion and Human Resources, 139–148.
Replogle, J. A., and Johnson, L. C. (1963). “Improved measuring and sampling equipment for sediment-laden runoff.” Trans. ASAE, 6(3), 259–261.
USDA. (1979). Field manual for research in agricultural hydrology. Agricultural handbook No. 224, revised February 1979, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
Wang, J. Y., Hermanson, R. E., and Hendrick, J. G. (1971). “Modification of H-flume and Coshocton wheel system.” Trans. ASAE, 14(6), 1015–1017.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14 • Issue 1 • January 2009
Pages: 65 - 74
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 13, 2004
Accepted: Apr 25, 2008
Published online: Jan 1, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.