Hydrologic Response of Grasslands: Effects of Grazing, Interactive Infiltration, and Scale
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 4
Abstract
Data collected at two measurement scales from a semiarid grassland are presented and analyzed to explore the hydrologic effects of grazing, interactions between overland flow and infiltration, and scale issues. Rainfall-runoff simulations were used to quantify the areal (3 by 10 m plot scale) response, and small-diameter (9 cm) disk infiltrometers were used to estimate point-scale hydraulic conductivity of bare and vegetated soil. Plot-scale data show that grazing increases runoff overall, a common result, but infiltrometer measurements indicate that only the point-scale hydraulic conductivity of vegetated soil is changed by grazing. In light of this and the well-known relationship between microtopography and vegetation in semiarid grasslands, we hypothesize that small-scale surface interactions (in particular, the so-called run-on phenomenon) are a significant component of the observed effects of grazing, as well as a factor in the hydrologic response of grasslands. Results obtained from high-resolution numerical simulations support this hypothesis. This phenomenon is not captured by classical infiltration theory or by the usual methods of statistical parameterization. In general, interactions are more likely to be important as spatial variability increases, and the relative importance of these interactions will be a function of the spatial structure of the variability and the hydrodynamics of overland flow, as controlled by microtopography.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ankeny, M. D., Ahmed, M., Kasper, T. C., and Horton, R.(1991). “Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55(2), 467–470.
Baker, F. G., and Bouma, J.(1976). “Variability of hydraulic conductivity in two subsurface horizons of two silt loam soils.” Proc., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., Vol. 40, Madison Wis., 219–222.
Bloschl, G., and Sivapalan, M. (1995). “Scale issues in hydrological modeling: A review.” Scale issues in hydrological modeling. J. D. Kalma and M. Sivapalan, eds., Wiley, New York, 71–88.
Close, K. R., Frasier, G., Dunn, G. H., and Loftis, J. C.(1998). “Tension infiltrometer contact interface evaluation by use of a potassium iodide tracer.” Trans. ASAE, 41(4), 995–1004.
Corradini, C., Morbidelli, R., and Melone, F.(1998). “On the interaction between infiltration and Hortonian runoff.” J. Hydrol., 204, 52–67.
Dagen, G., and Bresler, E.(1983). “Unsaturated flow in spatially variable fields, 1. Derivation of models of infiltration and redistribution.” Water Resour. Res., 19(2), 413–420.
DeCoursey, D. G. (1996). “Hydrological, climatological and ecological systems scaling: A review of selected literature and comments.” Interim Progress Rep., USDA-ARS-NPA, Great Plains Systems Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colo.
Dunne, T., Zhang, W., and Aubry, B. F.(1991). “Effects of rainfall, vegetation, and microtopography on infiltration and runoff.” Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 2271–2285.
Fiedler, F. R. (1997). “Hydrodynamic simulation of overland flow considering spatially variable infiltration and microtopography.” PhD dissertation, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Fiedler, F. R., and Ramirez, J. A.(2000). “A numerical method for simulation shallow discontinuous flow over an infiltrating surface.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 32, 219–240.
Frasier, G., Hart, R. H., and Schuman, G. E.(1995). “Rainfall simulation to evaluate infiltration/runoff characteristics of a shortgrass prairie.” J. Soil Water Conservat., 50(5), 460–463.
Huang, C., and Bradford, J. M.(1992). “Applications of a laser scanner to quantify soil microtopography.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 14–21.
Michaud, J., and Sorooshian, S.(1994). “Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 30(3), 593–606.
Morel-Seytoux, H. J. (1996). “Influence of variability in hydraulic conductivity on hillslope infiltration.” Proc., 6th Annual AGU Hydrology Days, Hydrology Days, Fort Collins, Colo.
Nachabe, M. H., Illangasekare, T. H., Morel-Seytoux, H. J., and Ahuja, L. R.(1997). “Infiltration over a heterogeneous watershed: Influence of rain excess.” J. Hydrologic Eng., 2(3), 140–143.
Nielsen, D. R., Biggar, J. W., and Ech, K. T.(1973). “Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties.” Hilgardia, 42(7), 215–259.
Sivapalan, M., and Wood, E. F. (1986). “Spatial heterogeneity and scalein the infiltration response of catchments.” Scale problems in hydrology, V. K. Gupta, I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, and E. F. Wood, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 81–106.
Soil Science Society of America. (1992). “Advances in measurement of soil physical properties: Bringing theory into practice.” Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No. 30, Madison, Wis.
Swanson, N. P.(1965). “Rotating-boom rainfall simulator.” Trans. ASAE, 8, 71–72.
Wooding, R. A.(1968). “Steady infiltration from a shallow circular pond.” Water Resour. Res., 4(6), 1259–1273.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 7 • Issue 4 • July 2002
Pages: 293 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 6, 2000
Accepted: Dec 10, 2001
Published online: Jun 14, 2002
Published in print: Jul 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.