Assessing Hydrologic Drought Risk Using Simplified Climate Model
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
Water resources systems operation requires drought risk estimates to mitigate possible drought-related damages. Drought risk assessment is complicated by the nonlinear interaction of the atmospheric hydrologic and oceanic systems where highly varied hydrologic system responses to similar drought-forcing phenomena can occur. A methodology capable of assessing drought risk associated with hydroclimatic events by using a simplified climate model is presented. Ensemble mean and standard deviations of hydrologic water storage represent the expected hydrologic system response to the hydroclimatic event. Relative frequency histograms and cumulative distribution functions characterize the range of hydrologic system responses that can occur and are used to obtain the spatially and temporally evolving drought risks. The methodology is presented in a framework suitable for application to resources management. An outline of the approach, description of the simplified climate model used in this study, and an illustrative example using a La type event as the drought-forcing mechanism are given. Simulation results, the methodology, and future directions are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arakawa, A. ( 1972). “Design of the UCLA general circulation model.” Tech. Rep. 7, Dept. of Meteorology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 91–116.
2.
Berkofsky, L., and Bertoni, E. ( 1955). “Mean topographic charts for the entire earth.” Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc., 36, 350–354.
3.
Bravar, L., and Kavvas, M. L. ( 1991). “On the physics of droughts II. Analysis and simulation of the interaction of atmospheric and hydrologic processes during droughts.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 129, 299–330.
4.
Brockway, C., and Bradley, A. ( 1995). “Errors in streamflow drought statistics reconstructed from tree ring data.” Water Resour. Res., 31(9), 2279–2293.
5.
California Department of Water Resources (CADWR). ( 1994). “California water plan update.” Bull. 160-93, Vol. 1.
6.
Carlson, T. N. ( 1991). Mid-latitude weather systems, Routledge, London.
7.
Dracup, J., and Kahya, E. ( 1994). “The relationships between U.S. streamflow and La events.” Water Resour. Res., 30(7), 2133–2141.
8.
Giorgi, F., Mearns, L., Shields, C., and Mayer, L. ( 1996). “A regional model study of the importance of local versus remote controls of the 1988 drought and the 1993 flood over the Central United States.” J. Climate, 9(5), 1150–1162.
9.
Goldman, D. ( 1985). “Stochastic analysis of drought phenomena.” U.S. Army Corps of Engrs. Training Document No. 25.
10.
Haberman, R. ( 1987). Elementary applied partial differential equations, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
11.
Haltiner, G., and Williams, R. T. ( 1980). Numerical prediction and dynamic meteorology, Wiley, New York.
12.
Holton, J. R. ( 1992). An introduction to dynamic meteorology, 3rd Ed., Academic, San Diego.
13.
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., and others. ( 1996). “The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project.” Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc., 77(3), 437–471.
14.
Kavvas, M. L., and Anderson, M. ( 1996). “Extreme droughts.” Hydrology of disasters, V. P. Singh, ed., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
15.
Matalas, N. ( 1963). “Probability distributions of low flows.” U.S. Geological Survey Profl. Paper 434A, Menlo Park, Calif.
16.
Nakatsugawa, M., Anderson, M., and Kavvas, M. L. ( 1996). “A simplified climate model with combined atmospheric-hydrologic processes.” J. Hydrological Sci., 41(6), 915–938.
17.
Pan, Z., Segal, M., Turner, R., and Takle, E. ( 1995). “Model simulation of impacts of transient surface wetness on summer rainfall in the United States Midwest during drought and flood years.” Monthly Weather Rev., 123, 1575–1581.
18.
Peixoto, J., and Oort, A. ( 1992). Physics of climate, American Institute of Physics Inc., New York.
19.
Piechota, T., and Dracup, J. ( 1996). “Drought and regional hydrologic variation in the United States—Associations with the El Southern Oscillation.” Water Resour. Res., 32(5), 1359–1373.
20.
Rasmussen, E. M. ( 1977). “Hydrological application of atmospheric vapour-flux analyses.” Operational Hydro. Rep. 11, WMO 476, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.
21.
Stull, R. B. ( 1988). An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
22.
Thornthwaite, C. W., and Mather, J. R. ( 1955). “The water balance.” Publ. in Climatology, 8(1), Laboratory of Climatology, Centerton, N.J.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 4 • October 2000
Pages: 393 - 401
History
Received: Aug 26, 1998
Published online: Oct 1, 2000
Published in print: Oct 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.