Spatial Analysis of Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture Data
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
Soil moisture plays a key role in various fields such as agriculture, meteorology, ecology, hydrology, and geotechnical engineering. A critical problem in the measurement of soil moisture through remote sensing methods is representing the spatial heterogeneity without distortion. In this study, a geostatistical technique, kriging, is used to characterize the spatial structure of the Little Washita soil moisture data measured by passive microwave remote sensing as part of the 1992 Washita study. Second-order statistical metrics verify the adequacy of kriged estimates against the observed soil moisture field. The results show that sampling of a systematic set of points produces a smoother soil moisture field compared to a random sampling of data points. To check the efficacy of kriging in estimating the unknown soil moisture values and related surface fluxes, evaporation is calculated. There appears to be a good correspondence between the evaporation values calculated from the original data and the kriged data. The frequency scaling ratio is used to identify the spatial coherence between the observed and the estimated soil moisture fields.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allen, P. B., and Naney, J. W. ( 1991). “Hydrology of the Little Washita River watershed, Oklahoma: Data and analyses.” ARS-90, USDA, Washington, D.C.
2.
ASCE Task Committee on Geostatistical Techniques in Geohydrology of the Ground Water Hydrology Committee of the ASCE Hydraulics Division. (1990). “Review of geostatistics in hydrology: I. Basic concepts.”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 116(5), 612–632.
3.
Davidson, D. A., and Watson, A. I. ( 1995). “Spatial variability in soil moisture as predicted from Airborne Thematic Mapper (ATM) data.” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 20, 219–230.
4.
Delhomme, J. P. ( 1978). “Kriging in the hydrosciences.” Advances Water Resour., 1(5), 251–266.
5.
Guetter, A. K., and Georgakakos, K. P. ( 1996). “Large-scale properties of simulated soil water variability.” J. Geophys. Res., 101(D3), 7175–7183.
6.
Hu, Z., Chen, Y., and Islam, S. ( 1998). “Multiscaling properties of soil moisture images and decomposition of large- and small-scale features using wavelet transforms.” Int. J. Remote Sensing, 19(13), 2451–2467.
7.
Hu, Z., Islam, S., and Cheng, Y. ( 1997). “Statistical characterization of remotely sensed soil moisture images.” Remote Sensing of Envir., 61, 310–318.
8.
Islam, S., and Engman, T. ( 1996). “Why bother for 0.0001% of Earth's water? Challenges for soil moisture research.” EOS Trans., 77(43), 420–421.
9.
Jackson, T. J., and LeVine, D. E. ( 1996). “Mapping surface soil moisture using an aircraft-based passive microwave instrument: Algorithm and example.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 184, 85–99.
10.
Jackson, T. J., and Schmugge, T. J. ( 1989). “Passive microwave remote sensing system for soil moisture: Some supporting research.” IEEE Trans. on Geoscience Remote Sensing, 27, 225–235.
11.
Kafritsas, J., and Bras, R. L. ( 1981). “The practice of kriging.” Rep. No. 263, Ralph M. Parsons Lab., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
12.
Kothari, R., and Islam, S. ( 1999). “Spatial characterization of remotely sensed soil moisture data using self organizing feature maps.” IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(2), 1162–1165.
13.
Lindsey, S. D., Gunderson, R. W., and Riley, J. P. ( 1992). “Spatial distribution of point soil moisture estimates using Landsat TM data and Fuzzy-C classification.” Water Resour. Bull., 28(5), 865–875.
14.
Mattikalli, N. M., Engman, E. T., Jackson, T. J., and Ahuja, L. R. ( 1998). “Microwave remote sensing of temporal variations of brightness temperature and near-surface soil water content during a watershed scale field experiment, and its application to the estimation of soil physical properties.” Water Resour. Res., 34(9), 2289–2299.
15.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Entekhabi, D., and Bras, R. L. ( 1991). “Nonlinear dynamics of soil moisture at climate scales.” Water Resour. Res., 27(8), 1899–1915.
16.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Vogel, G. K., Rigon, R., Entekhabi, D., Castelli, F., and Rinaldo, A. ( 1995). “On the spatial organization of soil moisture fields.” Geophysical Res. Letters, 22(20), 2757–2760.
17.
Yoo, C., Valdes, J. B., and North, G. R. ( 1998). “Evaluation of the impact of rainfall on soil moisture variability.” Advances in Water Resour., 21, 375–384.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 4 • October 2000
Pages: 386 - 392
History
Received: Feb 5, 1998
Published online: Oct 1, 2000
Published in print: Oct 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.