Transmuting Synthetic Unit Hydrographs into Gamma Distribution
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
A simple method for transmuting popular synthetic unit hydrographs (SUHs), such as those of Snyder, the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), and Gray, into the Gamma distribution has been proposed, the calculations for which can be performed on a calculator. It gives a smooth shape to an SUH, the area under which is guaranteed to be unity. Previous methods of SUH are shown to be the special forms of the Gamma distribution. The SUHs obtained using these methods are observed to be in serious error. The peak rate coefficient Cp in Snyder's method and the peak rate factor Df in the SCS method have imparted physical and conceptual meaning. The possible unified conceptual interpretation of the popular SUHs in line with the conceptual models of instantaneous unit hydrograph (IUH) has been presented. The method can do away with the calculations for W50, W75 and the exceptionally long tail of UH as is usually obtained using Snyder's method for fast responding catchments. It opens up the possibility for a variable dimensionless UH in the SCS method and gives a unified basis for the three popular methods in particular and the other methods in general. Application of the method has been illustrated through problems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aron, G., and White, E. L. ( 1982). “Fitting a Gamma distribution over a synthetic unit hydrograph.” Water Resour. Bull., 18(1), 95–98.
2.
Bernard, M. ( 1935). “An approach to determinate stream flow.” Trans. ASCE, 100, 347–362.
3.
Bras, R. L. ( 1990). Hydrology: An introduction to hydrologic science, Addison-Wesley, New York, 419–430.
4.
Chow, V. T. ( 1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5.
Clark, C. O. ( 1945). “Storage and unit hydrograph.” Trans. ASCE, 110, 1419–1446.
6.
Commons, G. ( 1942). “Flood hydrograph.” Civil Engrg., ASCE, 12, 571–572.
7.
Cordery, I. ( 1968). “Synthetic unit graphs for small catchments in eastern New South Wales.” Civ. Engrg. Trans. Instn. of Engrs., Australia, 10, 47–58.
8.
Croley, T. E., II. ( 1980). “Gamma synthetic hydrographs.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 47, 41–52.
9.
Dooge, J. C. I. ( 1959). “A general theory of the unit hydrograph.” J. Geophys. Res., 64(2), 241–256.
10.
Edson, C. G. ( 1951). “Parameters for relating unit hydrograph to watershed characteristics.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 32(4), 591–596.
11.
Flood hydrograph analysis and computations. (1959). Engineering and Design Manual EM 1110-2-1405, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
12.
Gray, D. M. (1961). “Synthetic unit hydrographs for small drainage areas.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 87(4), 33–54.
13.
Gray, D. M. ( 1970). Handbook on the principles of hydrology, Water Information Center, Inc., 8.36–8.47.
14.
Hann, C. T., Barfield, B. J., and Hayes, J. C. ( 1994). Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments, Academic, New York, 79.
15.
HEC-1, flood hydrograph package user's manual, Version 4.0. (1990). Hydrologic Engineering Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, Calif.
16.
Hudlow, M. D., and Clark, D. M. (1969). “Hydrological synthesis by digital computer.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 95(3), 839–860.
17.
Hydrology, Sect. 4 of national engineering handbook. (1972). Soil Conservation Service [now, National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)], USDA, Washington, D.C.
18.
Linsley, R. K., Jr. Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H. ( 1975). Hydrology for engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 245–248.
19.
McCuen, R. H. ( 1989). Hydrologic analysis and design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 388–407.
20.
Nash, J. E. ( 1959). “Systematic determination of unit hydrograph parameters.” J. Geophys. Res., 64(1), 111–115.
21.
Nash, J. E. ( 1960). “A unit hydrograph study with particular reference to British catchments.” Proc., Instn. Civ. Engrs., London, 17, 249–282.
22.
Ponce, V. M. ( 1989). Engineering hydrology: Principles and practice, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 175–182.
23.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Valdes, J. B. ( 1979). “The geomorphologic structure of hydrology response.” Water Resour. Res., 15(6), 1409–1420.
24.
Singh, S. K. ( 1998). “Reconstructing a synthetic unit hydrograph into a Gamma distribution.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Integrated Water Resour. Mgmt., Alexandria Univ., Egypt, 104–110.
25.
Singh, V. P. ( 1988). Hydrologic systems, Vol. 1: Rainfall-runoff modeling, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Chapter 18.
26.
Snyder, F. F. ( 1938). “Synthetic unit-graphs.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 19, 447–454.
27.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). ( 1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” Tech. Release No. 55, USDA, Washington, D.C.
28.
Taylor, A. B., and Schwarz, H. E. ( 1952). “Unit hydrograph lag and peak flow related to basin characteristics.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 33(2), 235–246.
29.
Viessman, W. J., Knapp, J. W., and Lewis, G. L. ( 1977). Introduction to hydrology, 2nd Ed., Harper & Row, New York, 134–148.
30.
Wu, I.-P. (1963). “Design hydrographs for small watersheds in Indiana.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 89(6), 35–66.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 4 • October 2000
Pages: 380 - 385
History
Received: Mar 2, 1999
Published online: Oct 1, 2000
Published in print: Oct 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.