Learning Seismic Design from the Earthquake Itself
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 11, Issue 3
Abstract
Visiting an earthquake damaged town is like visiting a gigantic structural testing laboratory. A carefully conducted forensic engineering can reveal much insight on the nature of earthquakes and the fundamental principles of seismic design. The earthquake devastated area is sufficient proof that earthquakes release a tremendous amount of energy. This energy propagates in all directions and enters a structure as ground motion which has displacement, velocity, and acceleration components. The seismic energy which is introduced into the structure must be dissipated within the structure. Energy dissipation shows itself mainly as inelastic behavior of the structural system. The structure must be damaged to dissipate energy. If seismic energy is dissipated at locations which make the structure unable to satisfy equilibrium of forces, collapse is inevitable. An earthquake resistant structure should dissipate seismic energy as damage in the structural system, but collapse should not occur. What is more, after the earthquake, damage should be economically feasible to repair. Observations reveal that beam-column joints and column ends are wrong locations to dissipate seismic energy. Shear failures and anchorage failures of reinforcing bars are wrong types of damage which dissipate very little energy and lead to collapse. Short columns and soft or weak stories must be strictly avoided. Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement should be well detailed and anchored. A successfully designed and constructed building should contain shear walls conforming to the year 2000 requirements of the ACI. In the wide earthquake devastated area, observations reveal that no buildings have collapsed which contain shear walls as part of the structural system. Shear walls are the seismic collapse insurance of a building. A successfully designed and constructed building should not sway out of control, should dissipate seismic energy by flexural plastification at bottom of shear walls and ends of beams. The occurrence of shear failure before flexural failure should never be permitted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1999a). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” 318 M-99 and Commentary (318 RM-99).
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1999b). “Commentary.” 318 Rm-99, Detroit.
Directorate of Disaster Management. (1997). “Seismic requirements for building in disaster areas.” AY-97, Ankara, Turkey.
Donne, J. (2001). The complete poetry and selected prose of John Donne, Amazon Books.
Erdik, M., and Durukal, E. (1999). “Preliminary evaluation of ground motion of August 17, 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake.” Turkish Engineering News, Institution of Turkish Architects and Engineers, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). (1994). Uniform building code, Vol. 2., Calif.
Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. N. J. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 20, 2005
Accepted: May 26, 2005
Published online: Aug 1, 2006
Published in print: Aug 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.