Constructability Rankings of Construction Systems Based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 13, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper uses the quantitative decision-making technique, the analytical hierarchy process, to derive prioritized scales for (1) the constructability factors; and (2) the relative contribution of common construction systems in a building superstructure comprising structural frames, slabs, envelopes, roof, and internal walls toward constructability. The identified constructability factors show that to enhance constructability design requirements should be easily visualized and coordinated by site staff, while designs should allow economic use of contractors’ resources and enable contractors to develop and adopt alternative construction details. The precast method is rated as the most constructible construction method, indicating its better performance in facilitating efficient and safe construction in the busy urban environment in Hong Kong. However, the methodology adopted in this study should be of international interest, especially for those desirous of improving constructability of designs with different contextual backgrounds.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (RGC Project No. PolyU5006/02E).
References
Abdullah, A., and Anumba, C. J. (2002). “Decision model for the selection of demolition techniques.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Advances in Building Technology, Hong Kong, 1671–1679.
Al-Harbi, K. M. A. (2001). “Application of the AHP in project management.” Int. J. Proj. Manage. 19(1), 19–21.
Arditi, D., Elhassan, A., and Toklu, Y. C. (2002). “Constructability analysis in the design firm.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128(2), 117–126.
Building and Construction Authority (BCA). (2005). Code of practice on buildable design, BCA, Singapore.
Cheng, E. W. L., and Li, H. (2002). “Analytic hierarchy process: A decision-making method for construction management.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Construction in the 21st Century, Miami, Fla.
Cheung, S.-O., Lam, T.-I., Leung, M.-Y., and Wan, Y.-W. (2001). “An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method.” Constr. Manage. Econom. 19(4), 427–437.
Cheung, S.-O., Suen, H. C. H., and Lam, T.-I. (2002). “Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128(5), 409–417.
Construction 21 Steering Committee (Construction 21). (1999). Construction 21, Ministry of Manpower and Ministry of National Development, Singapore.
Construction Industry Institute Australia (CIIA). (1996). Constructability manual, CIIA, Brisbane, Australia.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1986). Constructability: A primer, CII, Univ. Texas, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1995). Constructability: Execute summary, CII, Adelaide, Australia.
Construction Industry Review Committee (CIRC). (2001). Construct for excellence: Rep. of the construction industry review committee, CIRC, Hong Kong, China.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). (1983). Buildability: An assessment, CIRIA, London.
Egan, J. (1998). “Rethinking construction.” Rep. of the Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on the Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of UK Construction, Dept. of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions, London.
Expert Choice (EC). (2004). “Software.” Expert Choice Inc., ⟨http://www.expertchoice.com/software/⟩ (July, 2005 ).
Fong, P. S. W., and Choi, S. K. Y. (2000). “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(5), 547–557.
Forman, E. H., and Selly, M. A. (2001). Decision by objectives—How to convince others that you are right, World Scientific, Singapore.
Fox, S., Marsh, L., and Cockerham, G. (2002). “Constructability rules: Guidelines for successful application to bespoke buildings.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(8), 689–696.
Francis, V. E., Chen, S. E., Mehrtens, V. M., Sidwell, A. C., and McGeorge, W. D. (1999). “Constructability strategy for improved project performance.” Archit. Sci. Rev., 42(2), 133–138.
Gilleard, J. D., and Wong, P. Y. L. (2004). “Benchmarking facility management: Applying analytic hierarchy process.” Facilities, 22(1/2), 19–25.
Glavinich, T. E. (1995). “Improving constructability during design phase.” J. Archit. Eng., 1(2), 73–76.
Gray, C. (1983). Buildability: The construction contribution, Paper No. 29, Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot, U.K.
Gray, C., and Hughes, W. (2001). Building design management, Butterwork-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.
Griffith, A. (1984). “Buidability—The effect of design and management on construction (a case study).” Dept. of Building, Heriot-Watt Univ., Edinburgh, Scottland.
Griffith, A., and Sidwell, A. C. (1995). Constructability in building and engineering projects, Macmillan, Basingstoke, U.K.
Joint Practice Note (JPN). (2001). “Green and innovative buildings.” Joint Practice Note No. 1, Buildings Dept., JPN, ⟨http://www.info.gov.hk/bd/english/documents/joint/JPN01.pdf⟩ (July, 2005 ).
Khalil, M. I. A. (2002). “Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20(6), 469–474.
Lam, T. I. (2002). “Buildability assessment: The Singapore approach.” J. Build. Constr. Manage., 7(1), 21–27.
Low, S. P. (2001). “Quantifying the relationships between buildability, structural quality, and productivity in construction.” Struct Surv., 19(2), 106–112.
Ma, T., Lam, T.-I., and Chan, A. (2001). “A study into the barriers to the implementation of constructability in relation to project procurement process.” Proc., 1st Structural Engineering and Construction Conf., Honolulu, 95–100.
Mahdi, I. M., Riley, M. J., Fereig, S. M., and Alex, A. P. (2002). “A multicriteria approach to contractor selection.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 1(9), 29–37.
McGeorge, D., Chen, S. E., and Ostwald, M. J. (1992). “The development of a conceptual model of buildability which identifies user satisfaction as a major objective.” Proc., CIB Conf., Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
McGeorge, D., and Palmer, A. (2002). Construction management: New directions, Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
Nima, M. A., Abdul-Kadir, M. R., Jaafar, M. S., and Alghulami, R. G. (2001). “Constructability implementation: A survey in the Malaysian construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19(8), 819–829.
O’Connor, J. T., and Miller, S. J. (1994). “Barriers to constructability implementation.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 8(2), 110–128.
Poh, P. S. H., and Chen, J. (1998). “The Singapore buildable design appraisal system: A preliminary review of the relationship between buildability, site productivity, and cost.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16(6), 681–692.
Saaty, T. L. (1982). “The analytical hierarchy process: A new approach to deal with fizziness in architecture.” Archit. Sci. Rev., 25(3), 64–69.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” Interfaces, 24(6), 19–43.
Shen, Q. P., Lo, K. K., and Wang, Q. (1998). “Priority setting in maintenance management: A modified multiattribute approach using analytic hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16(6), 693–702.
Tran, T. X. M., Malano, H. M., and Thompson, R. G. (2003). “Application of the analytical hierarchy process to prioritize irrigation asset renewals: The case of the La Khe irrigation scheme, Vietnam.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage. 10(6), 382–390.
Uhlik, F. T., and Lores, G. V. (1998). “Assessment of constructability practices among general contractors.” J. Archit. Eng., 4(3), 113–123.
Wong, F. W. H., Lam, T.-I., De Saram, D. D., and Chan, D. W. M. (2004). “A compendium of common construction systems for recent building projects in Hong Kong.” Proc., CRIOCM Int. Research Symp., The Chinese Research Institute of Construction Management, Hong Kong, 39–46.
Wong, K. W., and Wu, M. (2002). “Priority setting of preferential parameters for home purchase in ChongQing—An analytic hierarchy process approach.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Advances in Building Technology, Hong Kong, 405–412.
Zin, R. M., Nesan, L. I., and Mohammed, A. H. (2004). “Constructability assessment framework.” J. Build. Constr. Manage., 9(1), 44–58.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 13 • Issue 1 • March 2007
Pages: 36 - 43
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 2, 2005
Accepted: Jan 4, 2006
Published online: Mar 1, 2007
Published in print: Mar 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.