TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 2006

Decision-Support Tool for Assessing the Environmental Effects of Constructing Commercial Buildings

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 12, Issue 4

Abstract

Construction of commercial buildings consumes significant amounts of energy and produces lots of emissions and waste. Where should environmental improvement efforts be focused during design and construction? The Construction Environmental Decision-Support Tool allows designers and industry practitioners to quantify energy use, emissions, and waste generation rates due to the construction phase of commercial buildings. A case study of the Bren School at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and several relevant construction scenarios are analyzed. When considering the complete building over its entire life cycle, the construction phase comprised 2% of energy consumption, 1% of CO2 emissions, 7% of CO emissions, 8% of NOx emissions, 8% of PM10 emissions, and 1% of SO2 emissions. This is due to the dominance of the long-term use phase (50years) compared to a relatively short construction phase (2years) . Scaling up to the national level, however, construction impacts of projects are significant. In each of the categories studied (temporary materials, equipment and materials transportation, equipment use, waste generation), there are actions that can be taken by designers and builders to improve construction phase environmental effects. In structural frame construction, particular areas of concern include material and equipment selection and temporary material use. Energy use and air emissions are primarily due to equipment use, which accounts for at least 50% of most types of emissions. The major contributors are concrete mixer trucks, concrete pumps, cranes, and air compressors. A single feasible decision, such as using a concrete mixer truck with a 335hp engine instead of one with a 565hp engine (but having the same capacity) would reduce total construction energy demand by 12%, and the emissions of CO, NO2 , PM10 , SO2 , CO2 , and HC by 3, 12, 8, 10, 12, and 10%, respectively. The use of significantly older equipment can have a formidable effect on construction phase emissions. In general, equipment larger that 175hp made prior to 1996 tends to have significantly greater emissions of HC, CO, and NO2 than more recent models. The majority of waste generated during construction of the structural frame consists of concrete and wood.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0094022, and by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) program under Grant No. R82957.NSF

References

Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES). (2000). Technical manual and user’s guide—version 2.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), Green Design Initiative. (2005). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) model.” ⟨http://www.eiolca.net⟩ (Feb. 12, 2005).
Environmental Defense (ED). (2004). “Tailpipe tally—how much does your vehicle pollute?” Online Calculator, ⟨http://www.ed.org⟩ (Feb. 10, 2004).
Guggemos, A. A. (2003). “Environmental impacts of on-site construction processes: Focus on structural frames.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Guggemos, A. A., and Horvath, A. (2003). “Framework for environmental analysis of commercial building structures.” Proc. Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Guggemos, A. A., and Horvath, A. (2005). “Comparison of environmental effects of steel- and concrete-framed buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 11(2), 93–101.
Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., and Lave, L. B. (1998). “Economic input-output models for environmental life cycle analysis.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(7), 184A–191A.
Horvath, A., and Hendrickson, C. (1998). “Steel vs. steel-reinforced concrete bridges: Environmental assessment.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 4(3), 111–117.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1996). “Revised 1996 guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Workbook.” ⟨http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/guidelin/ch1wb1.pdf⟩ (Sep. 16, 2002).
Junnila, S., and Horvath, A. (2003). “Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(4), 157–166.
Junnila, S., Horvath, A., and Guggemos, A. A. (2006). “Life-cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(1), 10–17.
Kura, B., Judy, T., Wisbith, A. S., and Stone, R. (2000). “Assessment of air emissions from shipyard cutting processes.” U.S./Japan Marine Facilities Panel, 23rd Technical Meeting, ⟨http://www.dt.navy.mil/ip/mfp/Papers.html⟩ (February 12, 2003).
Means, R. S. (1999). Building construction cost data, R. S. Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Mass.
Monterey County. (2003). “21st Century general plan update fact sheet.” ⟨http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/gpu/FactSheets/energy.htm⟩ (February 10, 2003).
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1997). The environmental effects of freight, Paris.
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD). (2005). “Air pollutants and your health.” ⟨http://www.sbcapcd.org/sbc/pollut.htm⟩ (May 31, 2005).
Suh, S., et al. (2004). “System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(3), 657–664.
UCSB Bren School of Environmental Science and Management. (2002). “Schedule of values.” Unpublished Rep., Santa Barbara.
UCSB Design and Construction. (1999). “90% construction document cost estimate, Bren School of Environmental Sciences and Management.” Unpublished Rep., Santa Barbara, Calif.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1999). “1997 economic census: Vehicle inventory and use survey, Geographic Area Series.” Rep. No. EC97TV-US, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE). (1994). “Evaluation of electricity consumption in the manufacturing division.” ⟨http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs94/ei/elec.html⟩ (Nov. 19, 2002).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1995a). “Electric arc welding.” AP-42 compilation of air pollution emission factors, Vol. I: Stationary Sources, Sec. 12.19, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1995b). “General industrial surface coating.” AP-42 compilation of air pollution emission factors, Vol. I: Stationary Sources, Sec. 4.2.2.1, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1996). “Gasoline and diesel industrial engines.” AP-42 Compilation of air pollution emission factors, Vol. I: Stationary Sources, Section 3.3, Supplement B, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1998). “Exhaust emission factors for nonroad engine modeling—compression ignition.” Rep. No. NR-009A, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000). “Highway vehicles: Heavy duty diesel trucks.” AP-42 compilation of air pollutant emission factors, Vol. II: Mobile Sources, Table 7.1.1, pending 5th Ed., Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). “The emissions and generation resource integrated database (EGRID).” Version 1.0 files, 2000 data sheets, December. ⟨http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/egrid/⟩ (Feb. 10, 2003).
U.S. Green Building Council. (2003). “LEED—leadership in energy and environmental design.” ⟨http://www.usgbc.org/LEED/LEED_main.asp⟩ (April 15, 2003).
Zimmer-Gunsul-Frasca Partnership (ZGF). (2003). “University of California, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management; Project.” ⟨http://www.zgf.com/projects_academic1.asp?id=131&projtype=Academic⟩ (Jan. 30, 2003).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 12Issue 4December 2006
Pages: 187 - 195

History

Received: Feb 23, 2004
Accepted: Jul 18, 2005
Published online: Dec 1, 2006
Published in print: Dec 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Angela Acree Guggemos, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Colorado State Univ., 1584 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1584. E-mail: [email protected]
Arpad Horvath, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, 215 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share