TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 14, 2009

Subway Station Diagnosis Index Condition Assessment Model

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15, Issue 3

Abstract

Condition assessment of subway stations is a major issue facing public transit authorities worldwide. The Société de Transport de Montreal (STM) requires a rehabilitation budget of CAD 643.6 million (2006–2010) for its aged stations. The STM and most transit authorities lack planning strategies that reflect this increase due to deficiency of condition assessment models and scarcity of existing models. The research presented in this paper assists in developing a condition assessment model (subway station diagnosis index). The model identifies and evaluates the weights of different functional (structural/architectural, electrical, mechanical, and security/communication functions) condition criteria for subway stations using the analytical hierarchy process. It also utilizes both the Preference Ranking Organization METHod of Enrichment Evaluation and the Multiattribute Utility Theory to determine the station diagnosis index (SDI). Data are collected from experts through questionnaires and interviews. A case study in the STM subway stations network is performed. Data analysis shows that structural and security criteria are the most important (36.1 and 27.3%, respectively). The STM stations are found deficient, with an average SDI of 4.4 out of 10. This research is relevant to industry practitioners and researchers, since it provides a condition assessment tool and a unified universal scale for subway stations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers express their gratitude and appreciation to the Société de Transport de Montreal STM, which generously allowed us to collect data and provided feedback and comments.

References

Abu-Mallouh, M. (1999). “Model for station rehabilitation and planning (MSRP).” Ph.D. thesis, Polytechnic Univ., Construction Engineering and Mgmt Dept., Civil Engineering.
Belton, V., and Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis, an integrated approach, Kluwer, Norwell, Mass.
Brans, J. P., and Mareschal, B. (1986). “How to decide with PROMETHEE.” ULB and VUB Brussels Free Universities, ⟨http://smg.ulb.ac.be⟩ (2005).
Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B., and Vincke, P. (1986). “How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24, 228–238.
Doumpos, M., and Zopounidis, C. (2002). Multi criteria decision aid classification methods, Kluwer, Norwell, Mass.
Kangas, A., Kangas, J., and Pykalainen, J. (2001). “Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning.” Silva Fennica Research Articles, 35, 215–227.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
Leskinen, P. (2000). “Measurement scales and scale independence in the analytical hierarchy process.” J. Multi-Criter. Decis. Anal., 9, 163–174.
Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., and Verbeke, A. (2004). “PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multi criteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 153, 307–317.
Roy, B., Present, M., and Silhol, D. (1986). “A programming method for determining which Paris Metro Stations should be renovated.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24(2), 318–334.
Saaty, T. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Semaan, N. (2006). “Subway Station Diagnosis Index (SSDI): A condition assessment model.” MS thesis, Concordia Univ., Canada.
Tompkins, E. (2003). Using stakeholders preferences in multi-attribute decision making: Elicitation and aggregation issues, Univ. of East Anglia, Norwich, U.K.
Zayed, T., and Halpin, D. (2004). “Quantitative assessment for piles productivity factors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(3), 405–414.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15Issue 3September 2009
Pages: 222 - 231

History

Received: Sep 18, 2007
Accepted: Feb 17, 2009
Published online: Aug 14, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nabil Semaan
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal Quebec, Canada H3G 1M7.
Tarek Zayed, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal Quebec, Canada H3G 1M7 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share