Environmental Impacts over the Life Cycle of Residential Buildings Using Different Exterior Wall Systems
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15, Issue 3
Abstract
This study analyzed the environmental impacts of a single-story residential building using different exterior wall systems. The environmental impacts over the complete life cycle of the residential buildings were determined and compared using the following indicators: air pollution index, energy consumption (embodied and operational), global warming potential, resource use, solid waste emissions, and water pollution index. The exterior wall systems analyzed were concrete block, poured in-place concrete, insulated concrete, traditional by 0.4 m ( by 16 in.) on center wood frame, traditional by 0.6 m ( by 24 in.) on center wood frame, and steel stud framing. Additionally, structural insulated panels were modeled for the operational energy of the building. For each scenario, the designs were based on the minimum value required by the International Building Code. ATHENA, a life-cycle assessment software tool, and eQuest, an energy usage modeling software tool that calculated the operational energy of the building, were used to evaluate the environmental impacts of the building, during the construction, use, and end of life phases, for each scenario. The results show that in the preuse phase, the insulated concrete buildings produce the greatest impact on the environment followed by the concrete block, poured in-place concrete, and steel stud buildings. Traditional wood frames had the fewest environmental impacts when considering only the preuse phase. In the use phase, the insulated concrete buildings had the lowest impacts to the environment because they required less operational energy, whereas concrete block, poured in-place concrete, traditional by 0.6 m ( by 24 in.) on center wood frame, traditional by 0.4 m ( by 16 in.) on center wood frame, and steel stud framing had progressively larger environmental impacts. The end of life phase was negligible with respect to the other phases. In the complete life-cycle assessment (LCA), 50-year life span, insulated concrete exterior walls used around 700 GJ (5%) less energy than traditional wood by 0.6 m ( by 24 in.) on center wall systems. The results also indicate the importance of exterior wall’s thermal mass for the energy performance of a building, especially for a city located in a hot climate zone such as Phoenix, Arizona, and the importance of a holistic approach, such as LCA, to properly assess the negative environmental impact of different technologies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this research was provided in part by the Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz). The writers gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Miles Costanza, Shukri Kattan, Christopher Harto and anonymous reviewers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the supporting organization.
References
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. (1997). Fundamentals Handbook, ASHRAE, Atlanta, Ga.
Arizona Real Estate Center. (2006). “Key sector construction activity 2000–2005.” ⟨http://www.poly.asu.edu/arec/⟩ (December 22, 2006).
The ATHENA Institute. (2003). “The ATHENA Institute's Environmental Impact Estimator (Version 3) [Computer software].” The ATHENA™ Sustainable Materials Institute, Ontario, Canada.
The ATHENA Institute. (2008). Environmental impact estimator: Summary indicator measures, The ATHENA Sustainable Materials Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Cole, R. J. (1998). “Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems.” Build. Environ., 34(3), 335–348.
Ecobilan. (2008). “TEAM 4.0: LCA software.” ⟨http://www.ecobilan.com/uk_lcatool.php⟩ (August 8, 2008).
Energy Information Administration. (2002). “Delivered energy consumption projections by industry.” ⟨http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/plugs/plecp.html⟩
Energy Information Administration. (2004). “State and U.S. historical data. Table 12. Electric power sector consumption estimates, selected years, 1690–2003, Arizona.” ⟨http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_use/eu/use_eu_az.html⟩ (August 16, 2007).
Energy Information Administration. (2007). “Annual energy review 2006.” DOE/EIA-0384 (2006) June 2007. ⟨http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/aer.pdf⟩ (August 16, 2007).
Fay, R., Treloar, G., and Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). “Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: A case study.” Build. Res. Inf., 28, 31–41.
Graedel, T. E., and Allenby, B. R. (2003). Industrial ecology, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Horvath, A. (2004). “Construction materials and the environment.” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 29, 181–204.
Horvath, A., and Matthews, H. S. (2004). “Advancing sustainable development of infrastructure systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(3), 77–78.
International Building Code. (2000). International energy conservation code, The Council, Falls Church, Va.
Junnila, S., and Horvath, A. (2003). “Life cycle environmental effects of an office building.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(4), 157–166.
Junnila, S., Horvath, A., and Guggemos, A. A. (2006). “Life cycle assessment of offices buildings in Europe and the United States.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(1), 10–17.
Kelly, T., Matos, G., Buckingham, D., DiFrancesco, C., and Porter, K. (2006). “Historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States.” Open-File U.S. Geological Survey, Data Series 140, Supersedes Open-File Report 01–006, ⟨http://minerals.usgs.gov/ds/2005/140/⟩ (August 16, 2007).
Keoleian, G., Blanchard, S., and Peppe, P. (2000). “Life-cycle energy, costs and strategies for improving a single-family house.” J. Ind. Ecol., 4(2), 135–156.
Kośny, J., Kossecka, E., Desjarlais, A. O., and Christian, J. E. (1998). “Dynamic thermal performance of concrete and masonry walls.” Proc., DOE, ASHRAE, ORNL Conference—Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Buildings VII, Clearwater, Fla., 629–643.
Lane, R. O., and Best, J. F. (1982). “Properties and use of fly ash in Portland cement concrete.” Concr. Int., 4(7), 81–92.
Li, K., et al. (2007). “Development of a framework for quantifying the environmental impacts of urban development and construction practices.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 41(14), 5130–5136.
MacMath, R. and Fisk, P. (2000). “Carbon dioxide intensity ratios: A method of evaluating the upstream global warming impact of long-life building materials.” American Solar Energy Society National Conf. Proc., Madison, Wis.
National Association of Home Builders. (2008). ⟨http://www.nahb.org/⟩ (August 24, 2008).
Ochoa, L., Hendrickson, C., and Matthews, H. S. (2002). “Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of U.S. residential buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(4), 132–138.
PE International. (2008). “GaBI software product sustainability.” ⟨http://www.gabi-software.com/⟩ (August 8, 2008).
Pierquet, P., Bowyer, J. L., and Huelman, P. (1998). “Thermal performance and embodied energy of cold climate wall systems.” For. Prod. J., 48(6), 53–60.
PRé Consultants. (2008). “SimaPro LCA software.” ⟨http://www.pre.nl/simapro/default.htm⟩ (August 8, 2008).
Smart Growth Network. (2000). “Residential construction waste: From disposal to management.” ⟨http://www.smartgrowth.org/library/resident_const_waste.html⟩ (August 16, 2007).
Transportation Research Board. (2008). “Environmental impact of coal fly ash in road constructions.” ⟨http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12636⟩ (August 8, 2008).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). “Annual 2003 characteristics of new housing.” ⟨http://www.census.gov/const/www/charindex.html#singlecomplete⟩ (August 16, 2007).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). “Ranking tables for metropolitan areas: 1990 and 2000.” ⟨http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/phc-t3.html⟩ (August 16, 2007).
U.S. Department of Energy. (2008). “eQuest, quick energy simulation tool for building.” ⟨http://doe2.com/equest/index.html⟩ (August 8, 2008).
U.S. Geological Survey and the Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources. (2004). “The mineral industry in Arizona. U.S. geological survey minerals yearbook—2004.” ⟨http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/state/2004/azstmyb04.pdf⟩ (August 16, 2007).
Vieira, P. S., and Horvath, A. (2008). “Assessing the end-of-life impacts of buildings.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(13), 4663–4669.
Winistorfer, P., Chen, Z., Lippke, B., and Stevens, N. (2005). “Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to the use, maintenance, and disposal of a residential structure.” Wood Fiber Sci., 37, 128–139.
Zapata, P., and Gambatese, J. A. (2005). “Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 11(1), 9–20.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 14, 2007
Accepted: Nov 25, 2008
Published online: Aug 14, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.