Water Utility Efficiency Assessment Using a Data Envelopment Analysis Procedure
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15, Issue 2
Abstract
Data envelopment analysis is used to compare the relative efficiencies of potable water utilities using the United States Environmental Protection Agency community water system survey data. Three ownership types (private for profit, private not for profit, and public), and two types of supply sources (ground and surface) are compared. Statistically significant results indicating efficiency advantages of certain utility types are found, and clear trends towards certain utility types are identified. The findings indicate that public utilities are most efficient overall, followed by private not-for-profit utilities, with private for-profit utilities being least efficient. Except for a few cases of very large supply demands, utilities employing groundwater sources were generally more efficient than those using surface water sources. A brief investigation into the marginal return on information obtained from using additional measurement variables to measure utility performance is presented. Additional ranking information can be obtained by using more discrete measurement variables, but with diminishing marginal returns. This presentation of public water utility efficiency evaluation should prove useful as a tool for guiding ownership policies and water source development strategies and demonstrates the utility of publicly available data sets.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to acknowledge Lawrence M. Seiford, Chairman of the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, and Warren Sutton, doctoral candidate in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering for their advice and critical appraisals and evaluations of the manuscript. The writers also wish to acknowledge the help of Brian Rourke of the EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (OGWDW) in obtaining and interpreting the original data set. The writers also wish to thank the detailed feedback provided by the three anonymous reviewers; their comments and suggestions were much appreciated.
References
Aida, K., Cooper, W. W., Pastor, J. T., and Sueyoshi, T. (1998). “Evaluating water supply services in Japan with RAM: A range-adjusted measure of inefficiency.” Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci., 26(2), 207–232.
Akosa, G., Franceys, R., Barker, P., and Weyman-Jones, T. (1995). “Efficiency of water-supply and sanitation projects in Ghana.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(1), 56–65.
Anwandter, L., and Ozuna, T. J. (2002). “Can public sector reforms improve the efficiency of public water utilities?” Environment Development Economics, 7, 687–700.
Arogyaswamy, K., and Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1997). “Organizational turnaround: Understanding the role of cutbacks, efficiency improvements, and investment in technology.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 44(1), 3–11.
Baker, R. C., and Talluri, S. (1997). “A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 32(1), 101–108.
Banker, R., Conrad, R., and Strauss, R. P. (1986). “A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and translog methods—An illustrative study of hospital production.” Manage. Sci., 32(1), 30–44.
Bessent, A. M., and Bessent, E. W. (1980). “Determining the comparative efficiency of schools through data envelopment analysis.” Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 57–75.
Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C. A. K., and Sahay, P. (1997). “DEA can be used to judge the efficiency of utilities in light of evolving regulatory policies: The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 98(2), 332–345.
Bosch, N., Pedraja, F., and Suarez-Pandiello, J. (2000). “Measuring the efficiency of Spanish municipal refuse collection services.” Local Government Studies, 26(3), 71–90.
Brockett, P. L., Cooper, W. W., Golden, L. L., Rousseau, J. J., and Wang, Y. (1998). “DEA evaluations of the efficiency of organizational forms and distribution systems in the US property and liability insurance industry.” Int. J. Syst. Sci., 29(11), 1235–1247.
Brockett, P. L., and Golany, B. (1996). “Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis.” Manage. Sci., 42(3), 466–472.
Bulla, S., Cooper, W. W., Wilson, D., and Park, K. S. (2000). “Evaluating efficiencies of turbofan jet engines: A data, envelopment analysis approach.” J. Propul. Power, 16(3), 431–439.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring efficiency of decision-making units.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2(6), 429–444.
Coelli, T. J. (1995). “Recent developments in frontier modelling and efficiency measurement.” Austral. J. Agric. Econ., 39(3), 219–245.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., and Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references, and DEA-solver software, Kluwer, Boston.
Crawford, C. G., and Wangsness, D. J. (1991). “Effects of advanced wastewater treatment on the quality of White River, Indiana.” Water Resour. Bull., 27(5), 769–779.
Jayanthi, S., Kocha, B., and Sinha, K. K. (1999). “Competitive analysis of manufacturing plants: An application to the US processed food industry.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 118(2), 217–234.
Kao, C., and Yang, Y. C. (1992). “Reorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurement.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 58(3), 356–362.
Kontodimopoulos, N., and Niakas, D. (2005). “Efficiency measurement of hemodialysis units in Greece with data envelopment analysis.” Health Policy, 71(2), 195–204.
Lambert, D. K., Dichev, D., and Raffiee, K. (1993). “Ownership and sources of inefficiency in the provision of water services.” Water Resour. Res., 29, 1573–1578.
Nievergelt, Y. (2000). “A tutorial history of least squares with applications to astronomy and geodesy.” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 121(1–2), 37–72.
Odeberg, H. (1993). “Using recursive least squares to form sensor opinions.” Sens. Actuators, A, A36(2), 89–96.
Ozcan, Y. A., Luke, R. D., and Haksever, C. (1992). “Ownership and organizational performance—A comparison of technical efficiency across hospital types.” Med. Care, 30(9), 781–794.
Seiford, L. (1996). “Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995).” J. Prod. Anal., 7(2–3), 99–137.
Thanassoulis, E. (2000a). “DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 127(1), 1–13.
Thanassoulis, E. (2000b). “The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK, water utilities: Water distribution.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 126(2), 436–453.
Thanassoulis, E. (2002). “Comparative performance measurement in regulation: The case of English and Welsh sewerage services.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 53(3), 292–302.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). “Community water system survey: 2000.” EPA 815-R-02-005A, Office of Water.
Wadud, A., and White, B. (2000). “Farm household efficiency in Bangladesh: A comparison of stochastic frontier and DEA methods.” Appl. Econom., 32(13), 1665–1673.
Westphal, J., Gulati, R., and Shortell, S. (1997). “Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption.” Adm. Sci. Q., 42(2), 366–394.
Worthington, A. C., and Dollery, B. E. (2001). “Measuring efficiency in local government: An analysis of New South Wales municipalities’ domestic waste management function.” Policy Studies J., 29(2), 232–249.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15 • Issue 2 • June 2009
Pages: 80 - 87
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 4, 2005
Accepted: Mar 31, 2008
Published online: May 15, 2009
Published in print: Jun 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.