TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 15, 2009

Optimization Model for Design and Operation of Transportation Networks in Seismic Regions

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15, Issue 2

Abstract

Large infrastructure systems (e.g., transportation networks) cannot be designed and operated based only on standard regulations provided by codes of practice and operations manuals. It is necessary to consider not only safety and functionality, but also the socioeconomic context and the cost effectiveness of an investment throughout its life cycle. This paper presents a model to optimize both the design parameters and the inspection and maintenance policies by maximizing the net present value of a project. The model uses decision trees and simulation methods, which take into account the uncertainties and variability in the mechanical performance of the system and in the decision process. The proposed model is illustrated using both a single structure and an entire transportation network located in a seismic region. The results present the variability of the design parameters and the inspection policies within several seismic environments and life cycles of a project. They also show that structural and operational optimization along with the appropriate contextual restrictions (e.g., financial, length of life cycle), are significant for the management of existing systems as well as the development of future infrastructure systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bayer, S. (2003). “Generation-adjusted discounting in long-term decision-making.” Int J. Sustainable Dev., 6(1), 1133–1149.
Bucher, C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2006). “Optimization of life maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures considering probabilities of violating safety, condition, and cost thresholds.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 21, 1–8.
Cinlar, E., Bažant, Z. P., and Osman, E. (1977). “Stochastic process for extrapolating concrete creep.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 103(6), 1069–1088.
Corotis, R. B. (2005). “Public versus private discounting for life-cycle cost.” Proc., ICOSSAR’05, G. Augusti, G. I. Schuëller, and M. Ciampoli, eds., Millpress, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). “A note on two problems in connexion with graphs.” Numer. Math., 1, 269–271.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Mori, Y. (1993). “Probabilistic methods for condition assessment, life prediction of concrete structures in nuclear power plants.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 142, 155–166.
FEMA. (2006). “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model.” HAZUS-MH MR2 technical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
Frangopol, D. M., Kallen, M.-J., and Noortwijk, M. (2004). “Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Review and future directions.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 6, 197–212.
Goda, K., and Hong, H. P. (2006). “Optimal seismic design considering risk attitude, societal tolerable risk level and life quality criterion.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(12), 2027–2035.
Gopal, S., and Majidzadeh, K. (1991). “Application of Markov decision process to level-of service-based maintenance systems.” Transportation Research Record. 1304, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Guillaumot, V. M., Durango, P. L., and Madanat, S. (2003). “Adaptive optimization of infrastructure maintenance and inspection decisions under performance model uncertainty.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(4), 133–139.
Harper, W., et al. (1990). “Stochastic optimization subsystem of a network-level bridge management system.” Transportation Research Record. 1268, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Jiang, W., and Xilia, L. (2005). “Prediction of structural performance and life-cycle analysis based on Bayesian dynamic models.” Proc., ICOSSAR’05, G. Augusti, G. I. Schuëller, and M. Ciampoli, eds., Millpress, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1679–1686.
Johansson, P.-O. (2001). “Is there a meaningful definition of the value of statistical life?” Health Econ, 20, 131–139.
Joyner, W. B., and Boore, D. M. (1981). “Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 71, 2011–2038.
Kleiner, Y. (2001). “Scheduling inspection, renewal of large infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(4), 136–143.
Kübler, O., and Faber, M. H. (2003). “Optimal design of infrastructure facilities subject to deterioration.” A. Der Kiureighian, S. Madanat, and J. M. Pestana, eds., Proc., ICASP’03, 1031–1039.
Levy, H. (1988). Stochastic dominance: Investment decision making under uncertainty, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Liu, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2006). “Optimizing bridge network maintenance management under uncertainty with conflicting criteria: Life-cycle maintenance, failure, and user costs.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(11), 1835–1845.
Liu, Y., and Weyers, R. E. (1998). “Modeling the time-to-corrosion cracking of the cover concrete in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Mater. J., 6(95), 675–681.
Mander, J. B., Dhakal, R. P., Mashiko, N., and Solberg, K. M. (2007). “Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges.” Eng. Struct., 29(10), 2662–2672.
Mayet, J., and Madanat, S. (2002). “Incorporation of seismic considerations in bridge management systems.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 17, 185–193.
Mishalani, R. G., and Madanat, S. M. (2002). “Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(4), 139–148.
Mori, Y., and Ellingwood, B. (1994). “Maintaining reliability of concrete structures. I: Role of inspection/repair.” J. Struct. Eng., 120(3), 824–825.
Onoufriou, T., and Frangopol, D. M. (2002). “Reliability based inspection optimization of complex structures: A brief retrospective.” Comput. Struct., 80, 1133–1144.
Pandey, M. D. (1998). “Probabilistic models for condition assessment of oil and gas pipelines.” Nondestr. Test. Eval., 31(5), 349–358.
Pate-Cornell, M. E. (1984). “Discounting in risk analysis: Capital vs. human safety.” Proc., Symp. on Structural Technology and Risk, Univ. of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Canada, 181–187.
Petcherdchoo, A., Kong, J. S., Frangopol, D. M., and Neves, L. C. (2004). “NLCADS (new life-cycle analysis of deteriorating structures) users’ manual: A program to analyze the effects of multiple actions on reliability and condition profiles of groups of deteriorating structures.” Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics Research Series No. CU/SR-04/3, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
Rackwitz, R. (2002). “Optimization and risk acceptability based on the life quality index.” Struct. Safety, 24(2–4), 297–331.
Rackwitz, R. (2005). “The effect of discounting different mortality reduction schemes and predictive cohort life tables on risk acceptability criteria.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91, 469–484.
Rackwitz, R., Lentz, A., and Faber, M. H. (2005). “Socio-economically sustainable civil engineering infrastructures by optimization.” Struct. Safety, 27, 187–229.
Sánchez-Silva, M., and Rackwitz, R. (2004). “Implications of the high quality index in the design of optimum structures to withstand earthquakes.” J. Struct. Eng., 130(6), 969–977.
Santander, C. F., and Sánchez-Silva, M., (2008). “Design and maintenance-program optimization for large infrastructure systems.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 4(4), 297–309.
Smilowitz, K., and Madanat, S. (2000). “Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure networks.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 15(1), 5–13.
Smith, J. E. (2004). “Risk sharing, fiduciary duty, and corporate risk attitudes.” Decision Analysis, 1(2), 114–127.
Val, D., and Stewart, M. (2003). “Life-cycle cost analysis as a tool for decision making.” Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, A. Der Kiureghian, S. Madanat, and J. M. Pestana, eds., Millpress, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 757–764.
Val, D., and Stewart, M. (2005). “Decision analysis for deteriorating structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 87, 377–385.
Wen, Y. K., and Kang, Y. J. (2001). “Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(3), 330–337.
Wen, Y. K. (2001). “Reliability and performance based design.” Struct. Safety, 23, 407–428.
Yang, S. I., Frangopol, D. M., Kawakami, Y., and Neves, L. C. (2006). “The use of lifetime functions in the optimization of interventions on existing bridges considering maintenance and failure costs.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(6), 698–705.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15Issue 2June 2009
Pages: 70 - 79

History

Received: Apr 20, 2007
Accepted: May 16, 2008
Published online: May 15, 2009
Published in print: Jun 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mauricio Sánchez-Silva, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Visiting Scholar, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136. Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 Este #19A-40, Edificio Mario Laserna, P6; Bogotá, Colombia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
David Rosowsky, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Dept. Head and A.P. and Florence Wiley Chair Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136. E-mail: [email protected]
Seth Guikema, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share