Condition Assessment of Water Distribution Pipes
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 12, Issue 3
Abstract
With average pipe replacement rates in the United States at about once in , effective assessment of pipe condition is required to plan renewal programs for distribution systems. The paper is based on a project for the American Water Works Association Research Foundation and presents findings and a management framework about utility practices in condition assessment and it validates the framework through comparisons with practices in leading utilities. The project findings indicated that utilities can utilize available information much better than they do. However, they are impeded by lack of a standard procedure for recording data on leaks, breaks, and condition indicators. Ideally, the large amount of information involved would be consolidated into a composite condition index, but this is not feasible. Advanced applications are required for the future. These might include real-time assessment, smart pigs to collect data, small chip sets, and automated pipe data registration. Research needs are indicated in nondestructive testing, leak detection and loss measurement, causes for pipe, joint, lining, and coating deterioration, and in situ methods to test condition. While condition assessment is a promising concept, it is not applied consistently. In the past, condition information was used by operations and engineering departments. The same decisions still require condition information, but organizations are more integrated, have newer methods available, and face higher standards and expectations than in the past. When utilities manage their distribution capital programs better, it can lead to organizational improvement across the board because different departments can work together to improve the entire system. By use of the proposed framework, combined with effective information systems, operations improvements, and capital improvement programs, utilities can optimize returns on their investments in distribution systems. Utilities will continue to face obstacles such as lack of records, inability to inspect pipes while in service, and not being supported for funding by boards or councils. In the end, the solutions may already be within the grasp of utilities, through better management of existing information.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Public Works Association. (2002). “Policy on GASB 34.” Kansas City, Mo., ⟨http://www.apwa.org⟩ (Feb. 9, 2002).
American Water Works Association (AWWA). (1996). Water transmission and distribution, 2nd Ed., Denver.
American Water Works Association Research Foundation. (1989). Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Underground Infrastructure Research, Denver.
American Water Works Association Research Foundation and UK Water Research Ltd., (2002). “Multi-utility buried pipes and appurtenances location workshop.” Rep. of a workshop, London.
American Water Works Association Water Loss Control Committee. (2003). “Applying worldwide BMPs in water loss control.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 95(8), 65–79.
Becker, J. (2003). “Water distribution system assessment and hydraulic model. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Brown, W. G., ed. (1998). Nondestructive evaluation of utilities and pipelines II, International Society for Optical Engineering Bellingham, Wash.
Cesario, L. (1995). Modeling, analysis, and design of water distribution systems, AWWA, Denver.
Deb, A. K., Hasit, Y. K., and Grablutz, F. M. (1995). Distribution system performance evaluation, AWWA Research Foundation: Distribution Systems, Denver.
Deb, A. K., Hasit, Y. J., Williams, J. A., Jr., and Jacob, R. (2001). New techniques for precisely locating buried infrastructure, AWWA Research Foundation, Denver.
Dingus, M., Haven, J., and Austin, R. (2002). Noninvasive, nondestructive assessment of underground pipelines, AWWA Research Foundation, Denver.
Ellison, D. (2001). Distribution infrastructure management: Answers to common questions, AWWA Research Foundation, Distribution Systems, Denver.
Farley, M., and Trow, S. (2003). Losses in water distribution networks: A practitioner’s guide to assessment, monitoring, and control, IWA Publishing, London.
Galleher, J. (2003). “PCCP—Lessons learned.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Grigg, N. S. (2004). Assessment and renewal of water distribution systems, American Water Works Association Research Foundation, Denver.
Grigg, N. S. (2005). “Assessment and renewal of water distribution systems.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 97(2), 58–68.
Hellier, C. J. (2001). Handbook of nondestructive evaluation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Horn, T. (2003). “Small line replacement and prioritization, Columbus Water Works.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Hudson, W. R., Haas, R., and Uddin, W. (1997). Infrastructure management: Design, construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, renovation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hughes, D. M. (2002). Assessing the future: Water utility infrastructure management, AWWA, Denver.
Jackson, R. Z., Pitt, C., and Skabo, R. (1992). Nondestructive testing of water mains for physical integrity, AWWARF, Denver.
Kirmeyer, G. J., Richards, W., and Smith, C. D. (1994). An assessment of water distribution systems and associated research needs, AWWA Research Foundation, Denver.
Kleiner, Y., and Balvant, R. (1999). “Using limited data to assess future needs.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 91(7),47–61.
Margevicius, A., and Haddad, P. (2003). “Catastrophic failures of Cleveland’s large diameter water mains.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Mavrakis, G. (2003). “Evaluating condition of water facilities using predictive life cycles.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Mergelas, B., and Kong, X. (2001). Electromagnetic inspection of prestressed concrete pressure pipe, AWWA Research Foundation, Denver.
Selig, E. T., and Nash, W. A. (1988). “Buried pipe research needs.” Pipeline infrastructure, B. Bennett, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Singer, P. (2003). “Future issues of water supply systems.” 2003 AWWA Annual Conf. and Exposition, Anaheim, Calif.
Smith, L. A., Fields, K., Chen, A., and Tafuri, A. (2000). Options for leak and break detection and repair of drinking water systems, Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio.
Thornton, J. (2002). Water loss control manual, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Troutt, J. D. (2003). “Water quality and distribution system integrity.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Walski, T. M. (1984). Analysis of water distribution systems, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Waterworks Bureau of Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2002). Leak detection and water loss control program, Tokyo.
Woodcock, M. (2003). “Research on pipe breaks and renewal.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Zimbelman, D. (2003). “Colorado-Big Thompson and Windy Gap Projects.” Distribution System Infrastructure Integrity Workshop, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 17, 2003
Accepted: Jul 15, 2005
Published online: Sep 1, 2006
Published in print: Sep 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.