Demographics and Industry Employment of Civil Engineering Workforce
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 126, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper provides a road map to studies and databases about civil engineering demographics and industry involvement by tracing workforce statistics, engineering degrees, data on industries and government, and economic forecasts. It is aimed at helping civil engineering managers, educators, and policy makers understand how their workforce evolved and what it will face in the future. The engineering workforce comprises about 1.5 million professionals in the United States (second in size only to that of teachers); of this number, civil engineering, at about 200,000 workers, is third behind electrical and mechanical engineering. However, the study shows that aggregation of workforce and economic statistics hides unique characteristics of civil engineering work caused by the concentration on consulting and state and local government. In fact, over 80% of civil engineers work either for consultants or government. This characteristic of civil engineering employment needs more study, particularly to determine how best to educate civil engineers to respond to the public–private arena of infrastructure and environment. During the past century, civil engineering has been a steady field with good opportunities, but civil engineers in the future will face the same career issues and pressures as other professionals. Global production of new engineers has now passed the one million-per-year mark, with U.S. production being about 12% of the total. This large supply of engineers will present intense competition to all engineering disciplines. ASCE faces many challenges to respond to the many changes in the civil engineering profession. The concept of institutes contained in ASCE's strategic plan will address many of the technical issues, but the study indicates that professional and educational issues need more attention.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC). ( 1999). “About the ACEC.” 〈http://www.ACEC.org〉 (Jan. 15).
2.
Armstrong, E. L., ed. (1976). History of public works in the United States. Am. Public Works Assoc., Public Works Historical Society, Chicago.
3.
ASCE. (1995). “Civil Engineering Education Conference,” Summary Rep., Washington, D.C.
4.
ASCE. ( 1991). Official Register, New York.
5.
ASCE. ( 1992). Official Register, New York.
6.
ASCE. ( 1993). Official Register, New York.
7.
ASCE. ( 1994). Official Register, New York.
8.
ASCE. ( 1995). Official Register, New York.
9.
ASCE. ( 1996). Official Register, New York.
10.
ASCE. ( 1997). Official Register, Reston, Va.
11.
ASCE. (1998). Strategic plan. Washington, D.C.
12.
Bordogna, J. (1998). “Tomorrow's civil systems engineer: The master integrator.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 124(2), 48–50.
13.
Book of the States. (1998). Council of State Governments, Vol. 32, Lexington, Ky.
14.
Cain, G. G., Freeman, R. B., and Hansen, W. L. (1973). Labor market analysis of engineers and technical workers. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
15.
Coates, J. F. (1997). “Engineers and the future of technology.” The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering, Washington, D.C., 27(3), 4–8.
16.
Davis, J. E. (1998). “ASCE: The march toward the 21st century.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 124(3), 53–56.
17.
Ellis, R. A. (1998). “Jobs, 1996–2006: Strong growth.” Engineers, 4(1), 2–13.
18.
Ellis, R. A. (1997a). “SESTAT: New data on engineers from the National Science Foundation.” Engineers, 3(4), 2–13.
19.
Ellis, R. A. (1997b). “What do futurists have to say to engineers?” Engineers, 3(2), 2–5.
20.
“Engineering degrees: For engineering education, 1997 outputs look like 1996.” (1998). Engineers, 4(1), 9–13.
21.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (1996). Directory of Design Firms, 1996–97, New York.
22.
Executive Office of the President. (1987). Standard Industrial Classification Manual 1987. Office of Management and Budget, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va.
23.
“Global production of new engineers.” (1998). Engineers, 1(4), 1–8.
24.
Grigg, N. S. (1996). “Education and research for infrastructure and public works.” J. Public Works Mgmt. and Policy, 1(2), 120–128.
25.
Grigg, N. S., Andersen, C. F., Daniels, J. Z., Gessler, J., and Levine, A. (1997). “Women in public works: The engineering pipeline.” Public Works Mgmt. and Policy, 2(2), 121–128.
26.
Harms, A. A. (1996). “Towards a foundational basis of engineering classifications.” J. Engrg. Educ., 84(4), 303–308.
27.
Heckel, R. W. (1995). “Disciplinary patterns in degrees, faculty, research funding.” J. Engrg. Educ., 84(1), 31–40.
28.
“How many engineers: Applications of SESTAT.” (1997). Engineers, 3(4), 9–11.
29.
Johnston, W. B., and Packer, A. E. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Hudson Institute, Indianapolis, xiii.
30.
Judy, R. W., and D'Amico, C. (1997). Workforce 2020: Work and workers in the 21st century. Hudson Institute, Indianapolis.
31.
Kutscher, R. E. (1994). “Projection of employment of engineers, 1990–2005.” J. Engrg. Educ., ASEE, 83(3), 203–208.
32.
Light, P. C. (1999). The true size of government. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
33.
Municipal Year Book. (1995). 62nd Ed., International City and County Management Association, Washington, D.C.
34.
Science and engineering indicators. (1998). National Science Foundation, (1998). Washington, D.C., A-113.
35.
“Societies and the engineer.” (1996). Engineers, 2(2), 2–6. U.S. Department of Labor. (1970). Bur. of Labor Statistics, “Occupational Employment Statistics 1967,” BLS Rep. 305, Washington, D.C.
36.
U.S. Congress. (1985). “Demographic trends and the scientific and engineering workforce—A technical memorandum.” OTA-TM-SET-35, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C.
37.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1933). Fifteenth census of U.S.: 1930. General Report on Occupations, Census Bureau, Vol. V, Washington, D.C.
38.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1957). Historical statistics of United States: Colonial times to 1957. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.
39.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1960). “Occupational Characteristics.” Census of Population: 1960, Final Rep. PC(2)-7A, Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.
40.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1979). 1977 Census of Governments. Compilation of Public Employment, Census Bureau, 3(2).
41.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1992). Census of Governments, Government Organization, Vol. VI, Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.
42.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1998). Bureau of Economic Analysis, “National accounts data.” http://www.bea.doc.gov〉 (November 12).
43.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1996). “Occupational employment statistics, 1994.” Bull. 2468, Bur. of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C.
44.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1997). Handbook of Methods. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C.
45.
Watson, G. (1988). The civils: The story of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Thomas Telford, London.
46.
Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary. (1984). Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
47.
Wisely, W. H. (1974). The American Civil Engineer: 1852–1974. ASCE, New York.
48.
Wulf, W. A. (1997). “Editorial.” Bridge, 27(2), 2–3.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 126 • Issue 3 • July 2000
Pages: 116 - 124
History
Received: Jan 25, 1999
Published online: Jul 1, 2000
Published in print: Jul 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.