Comparison of Men's and Women's Careers in U.K. Construction Industry
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 126, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper reports on a study of the factors and interrelated decisions that influence the career dynamics of female and male construction professionals. The research involved the collection of detailed career history profiles of matched pairs of male and female informants, at different stages of their careers. These data were used to establish the disparity between men's and women's career progression and to explore the determinants of women's organizational and occupational mobility patterns. It was found that problems existed for women at every career stage, where pressures created by the demanding work environment were compounded by inflexible working arrangements and overt resentment from their male colleagues. The findings suggest that ingrained attitudes and operating practices of large U.K. construction organizations will be difficult to change to the extent that they will encourage more female participation. Nevertheless, addressing the equality issue is essential if the industry is to develop a skilled workforce in the millennium, which taps the talents of all within society.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, M. (1993). A handbook of personnel management, 4th Ed., Kogan Page, London.
2.
Cargill, J. (1996). “Rising sum.” Build Mag., London, November 15, 42–47.
3.
Construction Industry Council membership census. (1995). Construction Industry Council, London.
4.
Construction Industry Board. (1996). “Tomorrow's team: Women and men in construction.” Rep. of the CIB's Working Group 8 (Equal Opportunities), Thomas Telford, London.
5.
Court, G., and Moralee, J. ( 1995). Balancing the building team: Gender issues in the building professions, Inst. for Employment Studies/Chartered Inst. of Build., University of Sussex, Sussex, U.K.
6.
Davey, C., Davidson, M., Gale, A., Hopley, A., and RhysJones, S. ( 1998). Building equality in construction: Good practice guidelines for building contractors and housing associations, Inst. of Sci. and Technol./Dept. of the Envir., Transport and the Regions (U.K.), University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
7.
Evetts, J. (1992). “Dimensions of career: Avoiding reification in the analysis of change.” Sociology, London, 26(1), 1–21.
8.
Evetts, J. (1994). “Women and career in engineering: Continuity and change in the organization.” Work, Employment and Soc., London, 8(1), 101–112.
9.
Evetts, J. (1996). Gender & career in science & engineering, Taylor and Francis, London.
10.
Facts about women and men in Great Britain 1996. (1996). Equal Opportunities Commission, Manchester, U.K.
11.
Finch, P. (1994). “Construction women hit glass ceiling.” Architects' J., London, 200(20).
12.
Foley, D. A. (1994). “Human-resource management for twenty-first century: Managing diversity.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 120(2), 121–128.
13.
Gale, A. W. ( 1994). “Women in construction: An investigation into some aspects of image and knowledge as determinants of the under representation of women in construction management in the British construction industry.” PhD thesis, University of Bath, Avon, U.K.
14.
Greenhaus, J. H., and Callanan, G. A. (1994). Career management, 2nd Ed., Dryden, Fort Worth, Pa.
15.
Khazanet, V. L. (1996). Women in civil engineering and science: It's time for recognition and promotion. J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 122(2), 65–68.
16.
Kirk-Walker, S., and Isaiah, R. ( 1996). Undergraduate student survey: A report of the survey of first year students in construction industry degree courses, entrants to academic year 1995–1996, Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies, York, U.K.
17.
Knutt, E. (1997). “Thirtysomethings hit thirtysomething.” Build., London, April 25, 44–50.
18.
Kvande, E., and Rasmussen, B. (1994). “Men in male-dominated organizations and their encounter with women intruders.” Scandinavian J. Mgmt., Norway, 10(2), 163–173.
19.
Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the team, Her Majesty's Stationery Ofc., London.
20.
“QS awarded £9,000 compensation for sexual discrimination by contractor.” (1995). Build., London, January 20, 13.
21.
Ross, R., and Schneider, R. (1992). From equality to diversity: A business case for equal opportunities, Pitman Publishing, Ltd., London.
22.
Sonnenfeld, J., and Kotter, J. P. (1982). “The maturation of career theory.” Human Relations, 35(1), 19–46.
23.
Srivastava, A. ( 1996). “Widening access: Women in construction higher education.” PhD thesis, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, U.K.
24.
Wilkinson, S. J. ( 1993). “Entry to employment: Choices made by qualified women civil engineers leaving higher education.” PhD thesis, Oxford Brooks University, Oxford, U.K.
25.
Yates, J. K. (1992). “Women and minorities in construction in the 1990s.” Cost Engrg., 34(6), 9–12.
26.
Young, B. A. ( 1988). “Career development in construction management.” PhD thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, U.K.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 126 • Issue 3 • July 2000
Pages: 110 - 115
History
Received: May 5, 1999
Published online: Jul 1, 2000
Published in print: Jul 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.