Hybrid Control Charts for Active Control and Monitoring of Concrete Strength
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 1
Abstract
Concrete is the most widely used material in construction industries. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and when possible, improve the efficiency of a concrete production process. Statistical process control is generally applied to gain information about variation in the manufacturing process. Control charts can be implemented to monitor the various processes involved in the production, the delivery and construction of concrete. When historical data are available on various projects, better insight into operational procedures can be obtained through the use of control charts. This paper studies a series of statistical analysis procedures to analyze the compressive strength of concrete. The proposed method is based on combining the cumulative sum (CUSUM) control chart and a run chart (CUSUM-run chart) for early detection of shifts in the process mean. The combined charts address both the consumers’ and the producers’ perspectives. The CUSUM-run chart can aid the consumer in making decisions about accepting or rejecting a strength test. In addition, the producers (concrete manufacturers) can use the chart to determine if the monitored process is out-of-control and subsequently attempt to identify the possible causes for the out-of-control situation. By identifying assignable causes of the out-of-control process, the producer can then improve the manufacturing process by reducing product variation, unnecessary waste, or over-designed concrete mixtures. The CUSUM-run chart is also beneficial in that it can often indicate when the strength of mixture is less than the minimum acceptable level very quickly. The delay in detecting an unacceptable strength can result in more penalties, project delays and increased associated costs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Concrete Institute Committee 214 (ACI 214). (2002). “Evaluation of strength test results of concrete.” ACI 214R-1-214R-20, Detroit.
Arizona Department of Transportation. (2006). “Design history report.” ⟨http://www.azdot.gov/Reportserver?/FAST/CCR/DesignHistoryReport&rc:zoom=Page%20Width⟩ (May 5, 2007).
Cement and Concrete Institute. (2001). “Monitoring concrete by the cusum system.” ⟨http://www.ecipolloni.it/CuSum.pdf⟩ (Sept. 10, 2007).
Chen, K. S., Sung, W. P., and Shih, M. H. (2005). “Reliable evaluation method of quality control for compressive strength of concrete.” J. Zhejiang Univ., Sci., 6A(8), 836–843.
Crowder, S. V. (1987). “A simple method for studying run-length distributions of exponentially weighted moving average charts.” Technometrics, 29(4), 401–407.
Day, K. W. (2006). Concrete mix design, quality control and specification, Taylor and Francis, London, 82–85.
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1991). Total quality control, McGraw-Hill, New York.
George, M. L. (2002). Lean six sigma: Combining six sigma quality with lean speed, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hawkins, D. M. (1992). “A fast accurate approximation for average run lengths of CUSUM control charts.” J. Quality Technol., 24(1), 37–43.
Hawkins, D. M. (1993). “Cumulative sum control charting: An underutilized SPC tool.” Qual. Eng., 5(3), 463–477.
Hawkins, D. M., and Olwell, D. H. (1998). Cumulative sum charts and charting for quality improvement, Springer, New York.
Laungrungrong, B., Mobasher, B., and Montgomery, D. (2008). “Development of rational pay factors based on concrete compressive strength data.” SPR 608, Arizona Department of Transportation, Ariz.
Leshchinsky, A. M. (1991). “Combined methods of determined control measures of concrete quality.” Mater. Struct., 24(3), 177–184.
Mandel, J. (1969). “The partitioning of interaction in analysis of variance.” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 73B(4), 309–327.
Montgomery, D. C. (2008). Introduction to statistical quality control, Wiley, New York.
NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods. (2003). “Anderson Darling test.” ⟨http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35e.htm⟩ (Dec. 14, 2007).
Page, E. S. (1954). “Continuous inspection schemes.” Biometrika, 41(1/2), 100–115.
Roberts, S. W. (1959). “Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages.” Technometrics, 1(3), 239–250.
Russell, H. G. (1999). “Quality control and testing of high-strength concrete.” Concrete products, ⟨http://concreteproducts.com/mag/concrete_quality_control_testing/⟩ (May 1, 2007).
Siegmund, D. (1985). Sequential analysis: Tests and confidence intervals, Springer, New York.
Soroka, I. (2006). “An application of statistical procedures to quality control of concrete.” Mater. Struct., 1(5), 437–441.
Sykora, V. (1995). “Amendment of appendix X2 in ASTM C 917 evaluation of cement uniformity from a single source.” Cem., Concr., Aggregates, 17(2), 190–192.
Woodall, W. H. (1985). “The statistical design of quality control charts.” Statistician, 34(2), 155–160.
Woodall, W. H., and Adams, B. M. (1993). “The statistical design of CUSUM charts.” Qual. Eng., 5(4), 559–570.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 25, 2008
Accepted: Aug 14, 2009
Published online: Dec 15, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2010
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Nemkumar Banthia
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.