Failure Criteria for Fibrous Anisotropic Materials
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 2
Abstract
A general failure criterion for fibrous anisotropic materials is developed in the paper. Since the strength of a lamina should depend on the lamina angle and be symmetric with respect to this angle, the strength of an off‐axis lamina may be expressed as a cosine series. The criterion has the flexibility of any desired degree of accuracy. This capability is needed for complicated materials such as wood and composites. Hankinson's empirical formula for uniaxial loading can be derived by using only the first two terms of the present approach. The accuracy of the criterion is justified through the comparison with experimental data for several material systems subjected to uniaxial and combined loading. The present criterion is also compared with other criteria as well and results are presented in figures. One of the main features of this criterion is that it does not need the shear strength of a material, which is difficult to determine experimentally.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cowin, S. C. (1979). “On the strength anisotropy of bone and wood.” J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME, 46, 832–838.
2.
Goodman, J. R., and Bodig, J. (1972). “Orthotropic strength of wood in compression.” Wood Sci., 4(2), 83–94.
3.
Gunderson, D. E., Bendtsen, L. A., and Rowlands, R. E. (1986). “A mechanistic perspective of the biaxial strength of paperboard.” J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME, 108, 135–140.
4.
Hankinson, R. L. (1921). “Investigation of crushing strength of spruce at varying angles of grain.” Air Service Information Circular No. 259, U.S. Air Service.
5.
Hashin, Z. (1980). “Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites.” J. Appl. Mech., 47, 329–334.
6.
Hill, R. (1980). The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press, London, England.
7.
Kobetz, R. W., and Krueger, G. P. (1976). “Ultimate strength design of reinforced timer‐biaxial stress failure criteria.” Wood Sci., 8(4), 252–261.
8.
Liu, J. Y. (1984). “Evaluation of the tensor polynomial strength theory for wood.” J. Compos. Mater., 18, 216–225.
9.
Norris, C. B. (1939). “The elastic theory of wood failure.” Trans. ASME, April, 259–261.
10.
Norris, C. B. (1960). “Strength of orthotropic materials subjected to combined stress.” Report No. 1816, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wis.
11.
Radcliffe, B. M. (1965). “A theoretical evaluation of Hankinson's formula for modulus of elasticity of wood at an angle to the grain.” Michigan Quarterly Bulletin, 48(2), 286–295.
12.
Rowlands, R. E., Gunderson, D. E., Suhling, J. C., and Johnson, M. W. (1985). “Biaxial strength of paperboard predicted by Hill‐type theories.” J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 20, 121–127.
13.
Suhling, J. C., Rowlands, R. E., Johnson, M. W., and Gunderson, D. E. (1985). “Tensorial strength analysis of paperboard.” Exp. Mech., 75–84.
14.
Tsai, S. W., and Wu, E. M. (1971). “A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials.” J. Compos. Mater., 5, 58–80.
15.
Wu, E. M. (1972). “Optimal experimental measurements of anisotropic failure tensors.” J. Compos. Mater., 6, 472–489.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 10, 1991
Published online: May 1, 1993
Published in print: May 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.