Variations in Measured Resilient Modulus of Asphalt Mixes
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 4
Abstract
The resilient modulus is used as a fundamental input parameter in the application of layer theory in flexible‐pavements design. The test for determining the resilient modulus is a repeated‐load indirect tension test in which specimens are loaded then unloaded diametrally and the recoverable strain is measured. The test procedure is standardized and documented by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in ASTM D4123. The statistical variability in the test for determining the resilient modulus is important for design purposes. There exist two sources of variability in the standard test procedure set by ASTM. The first source is observed where different specimens from the same mix have a different value of the modulus. The second source is due to the testing method where the cylinders are tested diametrally, and the random choice of axis can be another source of variability within the same specimen. Also, since ASTM D4123‐90 recommends an acceptable range for the load amplitude, the choice of the load amplitude may introduce some variability. In this paper, several specimens of asphaltic concrete were cast from the same mix. Each specimen was tested on three different axes, under four different loads, and the resilient modulus was measured, thus reflecting both the specimen‐to‐specimen and the axis variability. The two sources of variability were combined statistically to obtain an estivate of the coefficient of variation (COV) in measuring the resilient modulus. The resulting estimate of the variability can be combined with other variabilities that arise in practice, to obtain an estimate of the total variability that should be considered in designs based on the measured resilient modulus.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. (1986). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
2.
Alajmi, M. A. (1990). “An evaluation of short term curing of asphalt concrete mixes.” Res. Report No. 89‐05‐02, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., King Saud Univ.
3.
Almuqayyad, R. (1990). “A laboratory evaluation of moisture‐induced damage to asphalt concrete mixes in Riyadh streets,” MS thesis, King Saud Univ.
4.
Anani, B., Balghunaim, F., and Suwailimi, S. (1989). “Effect of field control of filler contents and compaction on asphalt mix properties.” Proc. Sixty‐Eighth Annual Meeting of the Transp. Res. Board, Jan.
5.
“General specifications for roads and bridges construction; revised 1987.” Circular No. 2403, Ministry of Communications, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
6.
Heinicke, J., and Vinson, T. (1988). “Effect of test condition parameters on .” J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 114(2), 153–172.
7.
Jimenez, R. (1988). “Control of aggregate gradation for asphaltic concrete.” Proc. 3rd IRF Middle East Regional Meeting, Vol. 5, 27–40.
8.
“Standard method of indirect tension test for resilient modulus of bituminous mixtures.” ASTM D4123‐82 (Reapproved 1987), Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 04.03, ASTM.
9.
Yoder, E., and Witczak, M. (1975). Principles of pavement design. 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1992
Published in print: Nov 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.