Interdependence of Beach Fill Volumes and Repetition Intervals
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 6
Abstract
Shore protection by beach nourishment is an environmentally favored method but is dependent on the availability of sand and its cost. Therefore, in order to save on cost and sand resources it is essential to keep the annual sand requirement for nourishment to a minimum. A theoretical model of a two‐dimensional infinitely long, straight beach is presented that links the nourishments volume (m3/m) with its decay due to losses and the intervals between beach nourishments with the required volumes. The results show that the average annual sand requirement is at its minimum when the nourishment is continuous, e.g. grain by grain according to demand. With increasing intervals the required annual nourishment volume increases rapidly. The corollary is that the sand requirement can be reduced by using smaller fill volumes at shorter intervals. In practice this means that an optimization of the sand requirement becomes a compromise between frequency of nourishment and the annual sand demand. The model shows that the sand requirement can be significantly affected by the beach fill volumes and the intervals between nourishments. Field data show that the model describes the sand‐loss rate to about half‐life of the fill. With increasing time the loss rate approaches a lower value. This lower loss rate may represent the “undisturbed” regional loss rate.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Dean, R. G. (1983). “Principles of beach nourishment.” Handbook of coastal processes and erosion, P. D. Komar, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 217–231.
2.
Fuehrboeter, A. (1974). “A refraction groyne build by sand.” Proc., 14th Coast. Engrg. Conf., ASCE, New York, N.Y., Vol. 2, 1451–1469.
3.
Fuehrboeter, A. (1985). “Stabilitaet von Sandvorspuelungen.” Tagungsbericht der 5, Nationalen Tagung für Ingenieurgeologie, Herausgeber: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erd‐ und Grundbau e. V. und Deutsche Geologische Gesellschaft e. V., Kiel, Germany, 161–167 (in German).
4.
Fuehrboeter, A., Raudkivi, A. J., Dette, H.‐H., and Dierken, H. (1991). “Untersuchungen zur Begrenzung der Ausraeumung des hohen Strandes vor Duenen ueber die Dauer von Sturmfluten.” Bericht Nr. 721, Leichtweiss‐Institut, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany (in German).
5.
Kamphuis, J. W. (1991). “Alongshore sediment transport rate.” J. Wtrwy. Port, Coast. and Oc. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 117(6), 624–640.
6.
Kunz, H. (1990). “Artificial beach nourishment on Norderney; a case study.” Proc., 22nd Coast. Engrg. Conf., ASCE, Vol. 3, 3254–3267.
7.
Le Méhauté, B., and Soldate, M. (1977). “Mathematical modeling of shoreline evolution.” Misc. Rep. No 77‐10, U.S. Army Coastal Engrg. Res. Ctr., Vicksburg, Miss.
8.
Pelnard‐Considère, R. (1956). “Essai de théorie de l'évolution de formes de rivage en plages de sable et al galets.” 4th Journées de l'Hydraulique, Les Energies de la Mer, Question III, Rapport No. 2, Paris, France, (in French).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 8, 1993
Published online: Nov 1, 1994
Published in print: Nov 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.