Estimating Ground-Water Damages from Hazardous-Substance Releases
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 126, Issue 6
Abstract
At present there are 1,194 Superfund sites throughout the United States that are on the National Priorities List, because past releases of hazardous substances have contaminated natural resources and pose a human health risk. Section 107 of the Superfund Act (more formally, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act) allows federal and state government agencies, acting as natural resource trustees, to collect monetary damages from responsible parties for residual losses incurred by the public as a result of injuries to natural resources (such as ground water) caused by hazardous-substance releases. Residual losses may include losses incurred prior to and/or after the completion of remediation activities. The agencies must use the recovered natural resource damages to restore, rehabilitate, replace, or acquire the equivalent of the injured natural resources. This article focuses on estimating natural resource damages from ground-water contamination at Superfund and other sites where hazardous substances have been released. The first section briefly describes the application of the natural resource damage assessment process to ground-water contamination. The second section discusses some techniques for valuing reductions in the services provided by ground water. The third section examines the applicability and measurement of so-called nonuse values associated with ground water. The fourth section addresses natural resource damage assessment issues that may arise at actual ground-water–contamination sites. The last section summarizes the main results of this article and presents some conclusions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Carson, R. T., Meade, N. F., and Smith, V. K. ( 1993). “Contingent valuation and passive-use values: Introducing the issues.” Choices, 2nd Quarter, 4–8.
2.
Cattin, P., and Wittink, D. ( 1982). “Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey.” J. Marketing, 46(3), 44–53.
3.
Desvousges, W. H., Gable, A. R., Dunford, R. W., and Hudson, S. P. ( 1993). “Contingent valuation: The wrong tool to measure passive-use losses.” Choices, 2nd Quarter, 9–11.
4.
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., and Wilson, K. N. ( 1992). “Measuring nonuse damages using contingent valuation: An experimental evaluation of accuracy.” Monograph 92-1 for Exxon Corp., Res. Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, N.C.
5.
Diamond, P. A., and Hausman, J. A. ( 1994). “Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?” J. Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64.
6.
Federal Register. (1986a). 51(No. 148, August 1), 27692.
7.
Federal Register. (1986b). 51(No. 148, August 1), 27721.
8.
Federal Register. (1993). 58(No. 10, January 15), 4601.
9.
Federal Register. (1995). 60(No. 149, August 3), 39811.
10.
Freeman, A. M. III. ( 1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
11.
Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V. ( 1990). “Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice.” J. Marketing, 54(4), 3–19.
12.
Habitat equivalency analysis: An overview. (1995). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
13.
Hanemann, W. M. ( 1994). “Valuing the environment through contingent valuation.” J. Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 19–43.
14.
Hausman, J. A., ed. ( 1993). Contingent valuation: A critical assessment, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
15.
Jones, C. A. (2000). “Economic valuation of resource injuries in natural resource liability suits.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 126(6), 358–365.
16.
Louviere, J. J. ( 1994). “Conjoint analysis.” Advances in marketing research, R. Bagozzi, ed., Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, Mass.
17.
McClelland, G. H., et al. ( 1992). Methods for measuring non-use values: A contingent valuation study of groundwater cleanup, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
18.
Mathews, K. E., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., and Desvousges, W. H. ( 1995). “The potential role of conjoint analysis in natural resource damage assessments.” TER General Working Paper No. G-9503, Triangle Economic Research, Durham, N.C.
19.
Mitchell, R. C., and Carson, R. T. ( 1989). “Existence values for ground water protection.” Final Rep. to the Office of Policy Analysis, Cooperative Agreement CR814041-01, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
20.
National Research Council (NRC). ( 1997). Valuing ground water: Economic concepts and approaches, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
21.
Portney, P. R. ( 1994). “The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care.” J. Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 3–17.
22.
Randall, A. ( 1993). “Passive-use values and contingent valuation—Valid for damage assessment.” Choices, 2nd Quarter, 12–15.
23.
Scaling compensatory restoration actions. (1997). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
24.
Schulze, W. D., Rowe, R. D., Breffle, W. S., Boyce, R. R., and McClelland, G. H. ( 1995). Contingent valuation of natural resource damages due to injuries to the Upper Clark Fork River Basin, RCG/Hagler Bailly, Boulder, Colo.
25.
Science Advisory Board (SAB). ( 1993). “Contingent valuation methodology (CV1).” SAB Rep., U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
26.
Strasma, J. ( 1996). “Estimating losses and indemnization for victims of pollution of well-water supplies: Some objective components of subjective losses.” Proc., Annu. Meetings of the Nat. Assn. of Forensic Economists, Kansas City, Mo.
27.
Unsworth, R. E., and Bishop, R. C. ( 1994). “Assessing natural resource damages using environmental annuities.” Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11(1), 35–41.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 126 • Issue 6 • December 2000
Pages: 366 - 373
History
Received: Jun 14, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2000
Published in print: Dec 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.