TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 2000

Valuing Beach Recreation Lost in Environmental Accidents

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 126, Issue 6

Abstract

This paper reviews methods that can be used to estimate the loss in use value associated with saltwater beach recreation in the case of an environmental accident, such as an oil spill. Particular attention is focused on methods for verifying beach attendance data and on transferring benefit estimates from other locales. The paper first reviews methods for estimating what reported attendance might have been had the accident not occurred. The next issue considered is how to verify reported attendance data and how to correct it when systematic inaccuracies are found. The paper then turns to the question of valuing a beach visit and reviews the relevant empirical literature.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Bell, F. W., and Leeworthy, V. R. ( 1986). “An economic analysis of the importance of saltwater beaches in Florida,” Florida State Sea Grant Coll. Rep. SGR-82, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Fla.
2.
Binkley, C. S., and Hanemann, W. M. ( 1978). “The recreation benefits of water quality improvement: Analysis of day trips in an urban setting.” Rep. EPA-600/5-78-010, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
3.
Bockstael, N. E., McConnell, K. E., and Strand, I. E. ( 1988). “Benefits from improvements in Chesapeake Bay water quality.” EPA Rep., Final Draft, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
4.
Braden, J. B., and Kolstad, C. D. ( 1991). Measuring the demand for environmental quality, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
5.
Brown, G. M., Jr. Congar, R., and Wilman, E. A. ( 1983). “Recreation: Tourists and residents.” Chapter 4, Assessing the social costs of oil spills: The Amoco Cadiz case study, Rep. NTIS PB84-100536, U.S. National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
6.
Chapman, D. J., Hanemann, W. M., and Ruud, P. ( 1998). “The American Trader oil spill: A view from the beaches.” AERE Newsletter, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Washington, D.C., 18(2), 12–25.
7.
Cox, D. R. ( 1968). “Some sampling problems in technology.” New developments in survey sampling, N. L. Johnson and H. Smith, eds., Wiley, New York, 500–527.
8.
Curtis, T. D., and Shows, E. W. ( 1982). “Economic and social benefits of artificial beach nourishment civil works at Delray Beach.” Rep., Dept. of Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla.
9.
Daly, C. B., and Harris, H. R. ( 1995). “Boston U. sets march at 837,000; estimates hinge on crowd density.” Washington Post, October 28, C3.
10.
Dorbusch and Co., Inc. ( 1987). “Impacts of outer continental shelf (OCS) development on recreation and tourism.” Rep. MMS 87-0066, Minerals Management Service, San Francisco.
11.
Dunford, R. W. ( 1999). “The American Trader oil spill: An alternative view of recreation use damages.” AERE Newsletter, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Washington, D.C., 19(1), 12–20.
12.
Freeman, A. M., III ( 1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
13.
Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G. K., and McFadden, D. ( 1995). “A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage.” J. Public Economics, 56, 1–30.
14.
Heilbrun, J. ( 1993). Urban economics and public policy, 3rd Ed., St. Martins, New York.
15.
Jones, C. A. (2000). “Economic valuation of resource injuries in natural resource liability suits.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 126(6), 358–365.
16.
Kolstad, C. D. ( 2000). Environmental economics, Oxford University Press, New York.
17.
Leeworthy, V. R., Meade, N. F., Drazel, K., and Schruefer, D. S. ( 1989). “A socioeconomic profile of recreationists at public outdoor recreation sites in coastal areas: Volume 2.” Rep., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
18.
Leeworthy, V. R., Schruefer, D. S., and Wiley, P. C. ( 1991a). “A socioeconomic profile of recreationists at public outdoor recreation sites in coastal areas: Volume 6.” Rep., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
19.
Leeworthy, V. R., and Wiley, P. C. ( 1991b). “Recreational use value for Island Beach State Park.” Rep., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
20.
Leeworthy, V. R., and Wiley, P. C. ( 1993). “Recreational use value for three southern California beaches.” Rep., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
21.
Leeworthy, V. R., and Wiley, P. C. ( 1994). “Recreational use value for Clearwater Beach and Honeymoon Island State Park.” Rep., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
22.
McConnell, K. E. ( 1977). “Congestion and willingness-to-pay: A study of beach use.” Land Economics, 53, 185–195.
23.
McConnell, K. E. ( 1992). “On-site time in the demand for recreation.” Am. J. Agricultural Economics, 74, 918–925.
24.
Moncur, J. E. T. ( 1975). “Estimating the value of alternative outdoor recreation facilities within a small area.” J. Leisure Res., 7, 301–311.
25.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. ( 1993). “Natural resource damage assessments under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.” Federal Register, 58(10), 4601–4614 (January 15).
26.
Ruud, P. ( 1994). “Beach attendance in the vicinity of the American Trader oil spill.” Rep. Submitted to the State of California Attorney General's Office, Sacramento.
27.
Shogren, J. F., Shin, S. Y., Hayes, D. J., and Kliebenstein, J. B. ( 1994). “Resolving willingness to pay and willingness to accept.” Am. Economic Rev., 84, 255–270.
28.
Silberman, J., and Klock, M. ( 1988). “The recreation benefits of beach renourishment.” Oc. and Shoreline Mgmt., 11, 73–80.
29.
Smith, V. K., and Palmquist, B. ( 1994). “Temporal substitution and the recreational value of coastal amenities.” Rev. of Economics and Statistics, 76, 119–126.
30.
Sullivan, A. M. ( 1991). Urban Economics, Irwin, Homewood, Ill.
31.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. ( 1981). “Beach erosion control and hurricane protection study for Dade County north of Haulover Beach Park, Florida.” Appendix 4, Survey Rep., and EIS Supplement, Washington, D.C.
32.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. ( 1993). “Martin County, Florida, shore protection project, general design memorandum.” Revised June 1994, Jacksonville District, South Atlantic Division, Jacksonville, Fla.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 126Issue 6December 2000
Pages: 374 - 381

History

Received: Jun 23, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2000
Published in print: Dec 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Economics, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara 93106.
Dept. of Economics and Bren School of Envir. Sci. and Mgmt., Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share