Role of Sociodemographic Characteristics in Projections of Water Use
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 117, Issue 2
Abstract
The effects of demographic and other socioeconomic variables (other than total population size) on differentials in per capita residential water use have received insufficient attention in water resource planning and water‐use projection efforts. This analysis uses secondary and primary data from a study completed in Texas to examine the magnitude and nature of the effects of such factors on per capita residential water use, and to evaluate the effects of the inclusion of such variables on the accuracy of projections of water use. Using regression and standard projection‐simulation techniques, the results suggest that demographic and socioeconomic variables, such as the age of the householder, racial or ethical status, and household composition, markedly affect water use, and are often of relatively greater importance than economic, climatic, or other physical factors in explaining per capita water use. The analysis also suggests that the inclusion of these variables in water‐use projection models could substantially increase the accuracy of the materials in projecting aggregate levels of water use.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Albrecht, D. E., and Murdock, S. H. (1985). The consequences of irrigation development in the Great Plains. Tech. Report No. 85‐1, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Tex.
2.
Carver, P. H., and Boland, J. J. (1980). “Short‐ and long‐run effects of price on municipal water use.” Water Resour. Res., 16(4), 609–616.
3.
Consumptive Use of Water by Major Crops in Texas. (1960). Bull. 6019. Texas Water Development Board, Austin, Tex.
4.
Current issues in natural resource policy. (1982). P. R. Portney, ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.
5.
Doeksen, H. R., and Pierce, J. C. (1976). “Citizen influence in water policy decisions: context, constraints, and alternatives.” Water politics and public involvement, J. C. Pierce and H. R. Doeksen, eds., Ann Arbor Science Publications, Ann Arbor, Mich.
6.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
7.
Dunn, D. F., and Larson, T. E. (1963). “Relationship of domestic water use to assessed valuation with selected demographic and socioeconomic variables.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 35(4), 441–451.
8.
Fitzsimmons, S. J., and Salama, O. (1977). Man and water: A social report. West‐view Press, Boulder, Colo.
9.
Ford, A. (1976). User's guide to the boom 1 model. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
10.
Francis, J. D. (1982). “Water.” Rural society in the U.S.: Issues for the 1980s, D. A. Dillman and D. J. Hobbs, eds., Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
11.
Gardiner, V., and Herrington, P. (1986). Water demand forecasting. Short Run Press, Ltd., Exeter, England.
12.
Gordon, R. A. (1968). “Issues in multiple regression.” Am. J. Sociol., 73(5), 592–616.
13.
Hamilton, L. C. (1985). “Self‐reported and actual savings in a water conservation campaign.” Envir. and Behav., 17(3), 315–326.
14.
Korsching, P. F., and Nowak, P. J. (1983). “Water resources research: potential contributions by sociologists.” Water resources research: Problems and potentials for agriculture and rural communities, T. L. Napier, D. Scott, K. W. Easter, and R. Supalla, eds., Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, Iowa.
15.
Kubat, D., Lei, L., and Watkins, G. (1968). Water use in south Florida residences: A sociological perspective. Florida Water Resources Center, Gainesville, Fla.
16.
Leistritz, F. L., and Murdock, S. H. (1981). The socioeconomic impact of resource development: Methods for assessment. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
17.
McFarland, J. W., and Hyatt, M. L. (1973). “Alternative futures using the Wollman‐Bonem models.” Water Resour. Bull., 9(4), 755–767.
18.
Maidment, D. R., and Miaou, S. P. (1986). “Daily water use in nine cities.” Water Resour. Res., 22(6), 845–851.
19.
Markusen, A. R. (1978). Socioeconomic impact models for boomtown planning and policy evaluation. U.S. Government Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.
20.
Mercer, L., and Morgan, W. D. (1978). A dynamic simulation of regional economic performance with alternative water policies. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Calif.
21.
Murdock, S. H., and Leistritz, F. L. (1980). “Selecting socioeconomic assessment models: A discussion of criteria and selected models.” J. Envir. Mgmt., 10(1), 1–12.
22.
Murdock, S. H., Hamm, R. R., and Albrecht, D. E. (1985). “Demographic and social dimensions of groundwater use and management.” Issues in groundwater management, E. T. Smerdon and W. R. Jordon, eds., The Center for Research in Water Resources, Austin, Tex.
23.
Murdock, S. H., Leistritz, F. L., Hamm, R. R., Hwang, S., and Parpia, B. (1984). “An assessment of the accuracy of a regional economic‐demographic projection model.” Demography, 21(3), 383–404.
24.
Murdock, S. H., Hwang, S., Hamm, R. R., and Leistritz, F. L. (1986). “The state of socioeconomic impact analysis in the United States.” J. Envir. Mgmt., 23, 99–117.
25.
Murdock, S. H., Hamm, R. R., Backman, K., and Hwang, S. (1988a). The future population of Texas: Alternative scenarios of growth and their implications for public and private services. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Tex.
26.
Murdock, S. H., Albrecht, D. E., Hamm, R. R., Backman, K., and Parpia, B. (1988b). An analysis of the effects of sociodemographic factors on daily per capita residential water use in Texas areas. Tech. Report No. 143, Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Tex.
27.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H. (1985). “Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs.” Appl. Lin. Statis. Models, Second Ed., Richard Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Ill.
28.
New directions in U.S. water policy: Summary, conclusions, and recommendations. (1973). National Water Commission, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
29.
Rao, R. K. (1988). “Planning and financing water resource development in the United States: A review and policy perspective.” J. Econ. and Sociol., 47(1), 81–97.
30.
Reid, G. W. (1971). “Multistructural municipal water demand model.” Water Resour. Bull., 7(6), 1238–1245.
31.
Shryock, H. S., and Siegel, J. S. (1980). The methods and materials of demography. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
32.
Skrabanek, R. L., Murdock, S. H., and Guseman, P. K. (1985). The population of Texas: An overview of Texas population change, 1970–80. Office of the Governor, Austin, Tex.
33.
Stees, C. S., Blake, R. E., and Churchill, T. J. (1976). Resource inventory management planning system (RIMPS): User's manual. Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Portland, Maine.
34.
Stenehjem, E. J., and Metzger, J. E. (1976). A framework for projecting employment and population changes accompanying energy development. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill.
35.
The nation's water resources. (1978). U.S. Water Resources Council. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
36.
Water for Texas: A comprehensive plan for the future. (1984). Texas Water Development Board, Department of Water Resources, Austin, Tex.
37.
Water resources research: problems and potentials for agriculture and rural communities. (1983). T. L. Napier, D. Scott, K. W. Easter, and R. Supalla, eds., Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, Iowa.
38.
“Water‐related technologies for sustainable agriculture in U.S. arid/semiarid lands.” (1983). Office of Technology Assessment, OTA‐F‐212, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C.
39.
“Water use in agriculture: now and for the future.” (1982). No. 95. Council for Agriculture Science and Technology, Washington, D.C.
40.
Williford, G. H., Beattie, B. R., Lacewell, R. D. (1976). “The impact of the declining groundwater supply in the Northern high plains of Texas and Oklahoma on expenditures for community services.” Res. Report No. 71, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A'M University System, College Station, Tex.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 117 • Issue 2 • March 1991
Pages: 235 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1991
Published in print: Mar 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.