TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 1991

Sociotechnical Analysis of Irrigation Drainage in Central California

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 117, Issue 2

Abstract

A sociotechnical framework is used to systematically investigate interactions between water agencies and proposed technical solutions to agricultural drainage problems in California's San Joaquin Valley during 1980s. State water officials face the conflicting incentive to reduce uncertainties over drainage treatment and disposal, while avoiding resolution of unknowns for fear of polarizing conflict over agricultural subsidies and waste disposal. To manage their dilemma, officials continue to order further studies and arrange more public hearings. Inability to make action‐forcing decisions characterizes every aspect of technomanagerial intervention, from planning and design of on‐farm irrigation management to resource mobilization for decommissioning of toxic evaporation ponds. Elimination of the dilemma requires separation of agricultural production goals of irrigation management from environmental protection goals of successful drainage management. Establishment of an independent drainage agency (or agencies) in the state is proposed with the sole mandate of environmentally sound drainage management.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
“Agricultural drainage and salt management in the San Joaquin Valley.” (1979). Final Report, San Joaquin Valley Interagency Drainage Program, Fresno, Calif.
2.
Arad, N., and Glueckstern, P. (1981). “Desalination, a review of technology and cost estimates.” Salinity in Irrigation and Water Resources, Dan Yaron, ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y., 325–361.
3.
“Backing for Big Valley Drain.” (1989). San Francisco Chronicle, Sep. 22, A4.
4.
“California agency adopts EDF plan to solve toxic wastewater problem.” (1987). EDF Letter, 18(5), 1, 8.
5.
“California water: Looking to the future.” (1987). Bulletin 160‐87, California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, Calif.
6.
“Cogeneration/selenium removal process study begins.” (1988). Westlands Water District Drainage Update, Aug., 2–3.
7.
“Construction of Harza Facility Slated to Begin.” (1988). West Valley J., Jun., 4.
8.
Developing options, an overview of efforts to solve agricultural drainage and drainage‐related problems in the San Joaquin Valley. (1987). San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento, Calif.
9.
Diringer, E. (1988a). “High levels of selenium in nature areas.” San Francisco Chronicle, May 11, A1.
10.
Diringer, E. (1988b). “Hodel move snags Kesterson cleanup.” San Francisco Chronicle, Apr. 16, A13.
11.
Diringer, E. (1989). “Warning of new toxic spots: ‘Final’ Kesterson cleanup plan OKd.” San Francisco Chronicle, Sep. 22, A4.
12.
“District suspends work on Selenium removal project.” (1988). Westlands Water District Drainage Update, May, 1–2.
13.
Eckhouse, J. (1989). “Farmers face perilous times.” San Francisco Chronicle, Mar. 13, C1, C3–C4, C8.
14.
Engelbert, E. A., and Munro, J. F. (1982). Incentives and disincentives for water conservation in the California state water policymaking process. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Office of Water Res. and Tech.
15.
Executive summary: Water quality control plan for salinity, San Francisco Bay/Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta Estuary. (1988). State Water Resour. Control Board, Sacramento, Calif.
16.
Fujii, R. (1988). Water‐quality and sediment‐chemistry data of drain water and evaporation ponds from Tulare Lake Drainage District, Kings County, California, March 1985 to March 1986. U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 87‐700, U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, Calif.
17.
Grismer, M. E., Chang, A. C., Grattan, S., Jenkins, D., Phene, C., Rhoades, J. D. Schroeder, E. D., Schwankl, L., Wallender, W. W., Tanji, K. K., Campos, C., Hukkinen, J., and Woodring, C. (1988). San Joaquin Valley Agriculture and River Water Quality. 3, Univ. of California Committee of Consultants on San Joaquin River Water Quality Objectives, The Univ. of California Salinity/Drainage Task Force and Water Resour. Ctr., Calif.
18.
Hall, Stephen (1989a). “My turn.” West Valley J., Sep./Oct., 3.
19.
Hall, Stephen (1989b). “My turn.” West Valley J., Dec., 3.
20.
Hanemann, M., Lichtenberg, E., Zilberman, D., Chapman, D., Dixon, L., Ellis, G., and Hukkinen, J. (1987). “Economic implications of regulating agricultural drainage to the San Joaquin River.” Regulation of agricultural drainage to the San Joaquin River, State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, Calif.
21.
Harris, T., and Morris, J. (1985). “Massive U.S. water projects blamed.” Selenium: Toxic trace element threatens the West; the Bee uncovers conspiracy of silence, Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, Calif., Sep. 8–10, 3–5.
22.
Hart, J., ed. (1984). The new book of California tomorrow: Reflections and projections from the golden state. William Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif.
23.
Hartshorn, J. K. (1985). “Down the drain to Kesterson.” Western Water, Mar./Apr., 4–10.
24.
Hilgard, E. W. (1886). “Alkali lands, irrigation and drainage in their mutual relations.” Report, Univ. of California, Coll. of Agr., State Office, Sacramento, Calif.
25.
Horne, A. J. (1988). “A research scientist's perspective on the management of Kesterson reservoir: A marsh contaminated with selenium‐rich agricultural drain water.” Lake and Reservoir Mgmt., 4(2), 187–198.
26.
Hukkinen, J. (1990). “Unplugging drainage: Toward sociotechnical redesign of San Joaquin Valley's agricultural drainage management,” dissertation presented to the University of California, at Berkeley, California, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
27.
Hukkinen, J., Roe, E., and Rochlin, G. I. (1988). When water doesn't mean power: How government can better handle uncertainty and polarization related to agricultural drainage in the San Joaquin Valley. University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
28.
Hukkinen, J., Roe, E., and Rochlin, G. I. (1990). “A salt on the land: A narrative analysis of the controversy over irrigation‐related salinity and toxicity in California's San Joaquin Valley.” Policy Sciences, 23(4), 307–329.
29.
Imhoff, E. (1989). Preliminary planning alternatives for solving agricultural drainage and drainage‐related problems in the San Joaquin Valley. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento, Calif., iii–iv.
30.
Irrigation‐induced water quality problems: What can be learned from the San Joaquin Valley experience. (1989). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
31.
Jenkins, D. (1986). “Treatment technology relative to San Joaquin River water quality objectives.” Regulation of agricultural drainage to the San Joaquin River, State Water Resour. Control Board, Sacramento, Calif.
32.
“Kesterson program.” (1987). San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program Status Report, (7), 4–5.
33.
“Kesterson program.” (1988a). San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program Status Report, (10), 3.
34.
“Kesterson program.” (1988b). San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program Status Report, (11), 3.
35.
“Kesterson program.” (1989). San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program Status Report, (12), 3.
36.
Kovda, V. A. (1983). “Loss of productive land due to salinization.” Ambio, 12(2), 91–93.
37.
Lee, E. W., Nishimura, G. H., and Hansen, H. L. (1988a). Technical report: Agricultural drainage water treatment, reuse, and disposal in the San Joaquin Valley, part I, treatment technology. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento, Calif.
38.
Lee, E. W., Nishimura, G. H., and Hansen, H. L. (1988b). Technical report: Agricultural drainage water treatment, reuse, and disposal in the San Joaquin Valley, part II, reuse and disposal. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento, Calif.
39.
Letey, J., Roberts, C., Penberth, M., and Vasek, C. (1986). An agricultural dilemma: Drainage water and toxics disposal in the San Joaquin Valley. Division of Ag. and Natural Resour., Univ. of California, Oakland, Calif.
40.
Liebert, Harry (1988). “Cleanup halted at Kesterson.” San Francisco Chronicle, Apr. 1, B8.
41.
Mazmanian, D., and Morell, D. (1988). “The elusive pursuit of toxics management.” The Public Interest, Winter(90), 81–98.
42.
Moore, S. B. (1989). “Selenium in agricultural drainage: Essential nutrient or toxic threat?” J. Irrig. and Drainage Engrg., ASCE, 115(1), 21–28.
43.
Ohlendorf, H. M. (1986). “Aquatic birds and selenium in the San Jbaquin Valley.” Selenium and agricultural drainage: Implications for San Francisco Bay and the California environment, The Bay Inst. of San Francisco, Tiburon, Calif., 14–24.
44.
Oster, J., Fulton, A., Goldhamer, D. A., Grimes, D. W., Hanson, B. R., Hoffman, G., Knapp, K., Letey, J., Weir, B., Tanji, K. K., Campos, C., Woodring, C., Wallender, W. W., Wooley, D., O'Neill, T., Stone, B., and Jones, R. (1988), Opportunities for Drainage Water Reduction. Univ. of California Committee of Consultants on Drainage Water Reduction, The Univ. of California Salinity/Drainage Task Force and Water Resour. Ctr., Calif.
45.
Preliminary planning alternatives for solving agricultural drainage and drainage‐related problems in the San Joaquin Valley. (1989). San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento, Calif.
46.
“Regulation of agricultural drainage to the San Joaquin River.” (1987). SWRCB Order No. W.Q. 85‐1 Technical Committee Report, State Water Resour. Control Board, Sacramento, Calif.
47.
Reisner, M. (1987). Cadillac desert: The American west and its disappearing water. Penguin Books, New York, N.Y.
48.
Reisner, M. (1989). “The emerald desert.” Greenpeace, 14(4), 6–10.
49.
“Removal of Selenium from Subsurface Agricultural Drainage by An Anaerobic Bacterial Process.” (1987). Final Report, Calif. Dept. of Water Resour., EPOC AG, Fresno, Calif.
50.
Schroeder, R. A., Palawski, D. U., and Skorupa, J. P. (1988). “Reconnaissance investigation of water quality, bottom sediment, and biota associated with irrigation drainage in the Tulare lake bed area, Southern San Joaquin Valley, California, 1986–87.” U.S. Geological Survey Water‐Resources Investigations Report 88‐4001. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo.
51.
“Selenium removal project hits snag.” (1988). West Valley J., Feb., 1.
52.
Tanji, K., Lauchli, A., and Meyer, J. (1986). “Selenium in the San Joaquin Valley.” Environment, 28(6), 6–11, 34–39.
53.
Tarr, D. (1988). “The journey of a million acres of cotton may begin with a single drop.” Aqueduct, 53(1), 21–25.
54.
Taylor, P. S. (1979). Essays on land, water and the law in California. Arno Press, New York, N.Y.
55.
Trompeter, K. M., and Suemoto, S. H. (1984). “Desalting by reverse osmosis at Yuma desalting plant.” Salinity in watercourses and reservoirs, R. H. French, ed. Butterworth Publishers, Boston, Mass., 427–437.
56.
Uphoff, N. (1986). Improving international irrigation management with farmer participation: Getting the process right. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
57.
Westcot, D., Rosenbaum, S., Grewell, B., and Belden, K. (1988). Water and sediment quality in evaporation basins used for the disposal of agricultural subsurface drainage water in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, Calif.
58.
Westlands water district drainage update. (1986). Nov., No. 9.
59.
“Workplan for San Joaquin River basin water quality objectives and regulation of agricultural drainage discharges.” (1986). SWRCB Order No. W.Q. 85‐1 Technical Committee Report, State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, Calif.
60.
“WWD okays $187,000 cogeneration study.” (1988). West Valley J., Jun., 2.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 117Issue 2March 1991
Pages: 217 - 234

History

Published online: Mar 1, 1991
Published in print: Mar 1991

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Janne I. Hukkinen
Res. Consultant, 351 Lester Ave., Apt. 3E, Oakland, CA 94606

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share