TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 2009

Implications of Transport Diversity for Quality of Life

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 135, Issue 1

Abstract

Different transport stakeholders have different needs for transport infrastructure and services. Meeting the needs of stakeholders implies a tradeoff of benefits and costs between supply and demand and creates issues of transport diversity. However, the literature has largely ignored these issues. This study aims to provide a framework evaluating transport diversity to promote quality of life. Transport diversity is defined as the satisfied level of stakeholder needs in this study and measured as the gap between the expected goal and present values of stakeholder needs in the form of the Shannon–Weaver index. Transport diversity can assess whether the level to which important needs are satisfied equitably, and monitor whether the transportation system is moving toward sustainability via confirming the targets and the basic level of quality of life. This study hopes that the conceptual framework developed can assist decision makers in understanding the relationship between transport diversity and sustainability, and provide a new assessment method for improvements in quality of life.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSCTNSC 96-2415-H-009-001-MY3.

References

Barlas, Y., and Yasarcan, H. (2006). “Goal setting, evaluation, learning and revision: A dynamic modeling approach.” Eval. Program Plan., 29(1), 79–87.
Burns, L. D. (1979). Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.
Chen, F. Y., and Chang, Y. H. (2005). “Examining airline service quality from a process perspective.” J. Air Transp. Manag., 11(2), 79–87.
Commission of the European Communities. (2002). “Communication from the commission on impact assessment.” COM(2002) 276 final, Brussels, Belgium.
Deng, W. (2007). “Using a revised importance-performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism.” Tourism Manage., 28(5), 1274–1284.
de Vasconcellos, E. A. (2005). “Transport metabolism, social diversity and equity: The case of Sao Paulo, Brazil.” J. Transp. Geogr., 13(4), 329–339.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., and Smith, H. L. (1999). “Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of process.” Psychol. Bull., 125(2), 276–302.
Eckton, G. D. C. (2003). “Road-user charging and the Lake District National Park.” J. Transp. Geogr., 11(4), 307–317.
Ferguson, B. K. (1996). “The maintenance of landscape health in the midst of land use change.” J. Environ. Manage., 48(4), 387–395.
George, C. (2001). “Sustainability appraisal for sustainable development: Integrating everything from jobs to climate change.” Proj. Appraisal J., 19(1), 95–106.
Hamilton, A. J. (2005). “Species diversity or biodiversity?” J. Environ. Manage., 75(1), 89–92.
Hunter, M. L., Jr. (1990). Wildlife, forests, and forestry: Principles of managing forests for biological diversity, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Jeon, C. M., Amekudzi, A. A., and Vanegas, J. (2006). “Transportation system sustainability issues in high-, middle-, and low-income economics: Case studies from Georgia (U.S.), South Korea, Colombia, and Ghana.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 132(3), 172–186.
Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., and Tsuji, S. (1984). “Attractive quality and must-be quality.” Hinshitsu (Quality, J. Japanese Soc. for Quality Control), 14(2), 39–48.
Kasemir, B., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C. C., and Gardner, M. T. (2003). Public participation in sustainability science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Koontz, T. M. (2003). “The farmer, the planner, and the local citizen in the dell: How collaborative groups plan for farmland preservation.” Landsc. Urban Plann., 66(1), 19–34.
Levine, J., and Garb, Y. (2002). “Congestion pricing conditional promise: Promotion of accessibility or mobility?” Transp. Policy, 9(3), 178–188.
Levinson, D. (2003). “Perspectives on efficiency in transportation.” Int. J. Transp. Manage., 1(3), 145–155.
Loo, B. P. Y., and Chow, S. Y. (2006). “Sustainable urban transportation: Concepts, policies, and methodologies.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 132(2), 76–79.
Malizia, E. E., and Ke, S. (1993). “The influence of economic diversity on unemployment and stability.” J. Regional Sci., 33(2), 221–235.
Martellato, D., Reggiani, A., and Nijkamp, P. (1998). “Measurement and measures of network accessibility—Economic perspectives.” Transport networks in Europe: Concepts, analysis and policies. K. Button, P. Nijkamp, and H. Priemus, eds., Edward Elgar, London.
May, R. M. (1976). Theoretical ecology: Principle and applications, Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
McMahon, S. K. (2002). “The development of quality of life indicators—A case study from the City of Bristol, U.K.” Ecol. Indic., 2(1–2), 177–185.
Muller, F. (1998). “Gradients in ecological systems.” Ecol. Modell., 108(1–3), 3–21.
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., and Olsson, L. (2007). “Categorising tools for sustainability assessment.” Ecologic. Econ., 60(3), 498–508.
Odum, E. P. (1993). Ecology and our endangered life-support system, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
Odum, H. T. (1983). Systems ecology, Wiley, New York.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001).OECD environmental indicators: Towards sustainable development, OECD Publications Service, Paris.
Point, S., and Singh, V. (2003). “Defining and dimensionalising diversity: Evidence from corporate websites across Europe.” Eur. Manage. J., 21(6), 750–761.
Pope, J., Annandale, D., and Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). “Conceptualising sustainability assessment.” Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev., 24(6), 595–616.
Rammel, C., and van den Bergh, J. (2003). “An evolutionary perspective on sustainable development policies: Adaptive flexibility and risk minimizing.” Ecologic. Econ., 47(2–3), 121–133.
Reeves, D. (2005). Planning for diversity: Policy and planning in a world of difference, Routledge, Oxon, U.K.
Sanchez-Silva, M., Daniels, M., Lleras, G., and Patino, D. (2005). “A transport network reliability model for the efficient assignment of resources.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 39(1), 47–63.
Shafer, C. S., Lee, B. K., and Turner, S. (2000). “A tale of three greenway trails: User perceptions related to quality of life.” Landsc. Urban Plann., 49(3–4), 163–178.
Sohail, M., Maunder, D. A. C., and Cavill, S. (2006). “Effective regulation for sustainable public transport in developing countries.” U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 13(3), 177–190.
Soltani, A., and Allan, A. (2006). “Analyzing the impact of microscale urban attributes on travel: Evidence from suburban Adelaide, Australia.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 132(3), 132–137.
Steg, L., and Gifford, R. (2005). “Sustainable transportation and quality of life.” J. Transp. Geogr., 13(1), 59–69.
Templet, P. H. (1999). “Energy, diversity and development in economic systems; an empirical analysis.” Ecologic. Econ., 30(2), 223–233.
Topolski, T. D., Edwards, T. C., and Patrick, D. L. (2004). “Toward youth self-report of health and quality of life in population monitoring.” Ambul. Pediatr., 4(4), 387–394.
van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., and Marsman, G. (2003). “Urban environmental quality and human well-being towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: A literature study.” Landsc. Urban Plann., 65(1–2), 5–18.
Wachs, M., and Koenig, J. G. (1979). “Behavioral modeling, accessibility, mobility and travel needs.” Behavioural travel modelling, D. A. Hensher and P. R. Stopher, eds., Croom Helm, London.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
World Health Organization Quality of Life Group (WHOQOL). (1998). “The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties.” Soc. Sci. Med., 46(12), 1569–1585.
Yang, Z. (2002). “Microanalysis of shopping center location in terms of retail supply quality and environmental impact.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 128(3), 139–149.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 135Issue 1March 2009
Pages: 13 - 18

History

Received: Jun 6, 2007
Accepted: Apr 25, 2008
Published online: Mar 1, 2009
Published in print: Mar 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cheng-Min Feng [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Traffic and Transportation, National Chiao Tung Univ., 4F, 114, Sec. 1, Chung-Hsiao W. Rd., Taipei 10012, Taiwan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Cheng-Hsien Hsieh [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Institute of Traffic and Transportation, National Chiao Tung Univ., 4F, 114, Sec. 1, Chung-Hsiao W. Rd., Taipei 10012, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share