Waste Facility Impacts on Residential Property Values
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 115, Issue 2
Abstract
Property‐value guarantees (PVGs) by the proponent of a waste facility may be an effective tool to compensate nearby property owners if the facility impacts property values adversely. A review of the theory, and of 13 empirical property‐value studies, shows inconsistent results. For a thorough test, physicalimpact analyses and property‐value‐differential analyses are carried out at two typical waste facilities, a landfill and an incinerator. However, no significant effects of observed physical impacts on property sales prices are shown to be present. The insignificant results are possibly caused by the violation of three crucial assumptions: Buyers are usually not perfectly informed about facility impacts; buyers may be less sensitive to the impacts; offsetting property‐value increases may occur due to development in the host community. Further, sellers may prefer to hold out, refuse to sell, or wait longer to sell for a better price. Property‐value decreases are, therefore, inaccurate indicators for facility impacts or host community opposition. Hence, if property‐value guarantees are effective in gaining the acceptance of the host community, it is because they address fears about facility impacts rather than compensate for objectively measurable property‐value losses.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baker, B. P. (1982). “Land values and disamenities: The case of hazardous waste disposal facilities and landfills,” thesis presented to Cornell University, at Ithaca, N. Y., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
2.
Black & Veatch. (1987). “Phase I: Remedial investigation report—Tacoma landfill, Tacoma, Wash.” Report for the city of Tacoma, Wash., Black & Veatch.
3.
Blomquist, G. (1974). “The effect of electric utility power plant location on area property value.” Land Economics, 50(1), 97–100.
4.
Centaur Associates, Inc. (1979). “Siting of hazardous waste management facilities and public opposition.” Report SW‐809, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C.
5.
Freeman, A. (1979). The benefits of environmental improvement. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Philadelphia, Pa.
6.
Gamble, H., and Downing, R. (1982). “The effects of nuclear power plants on residential property values.” J. of Reg. Sci., 22(4).
7.
Gamble, H., and Downing, R. (1984). “Effects of sanitary landfills on property values and residential developments on solid and liquid wastes.” The Management, Methods and Socioeconomic Considerations, S. Majunder and E. Wilfer, eds., National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
8.
The effect of solid waste disposal sites on property values. (1972). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
9.
Groth, D. (1981). “Wildwood sanitary landfill feasibility study.” CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc., Portland, Oreg.
10.
Hansen, R. (1982). “Site selection process and preliminary site evaluation.” Marion County Public Works Dept., Salem, Oreg.
11.
Hockman, D., Hwang, E., and Rudzitis, G. (1976). The environmental costs of landfills and incinerators. Univ. of Chicago and the Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, Ill.
12.
Knetsch, J. (1983). Property rights and compensation. Toronto and Vancouver, Butterworth.
13.
Ley, D. (1983). A social geography of the city. Harper and Row, Publishers Inc., New York, N.Y.
14.
Mishan, E. (1982). Cost‐benefit analysis. 3 Ed., George Allen and Unwin, London, England.
15.
Nelson, J. (1981). “TMI and residential property values: Empirical analysis and policy implications.” Land Economics, 57(3), 363–372.
16.
Paul, M. E. (1971). “Can airport noise be measured in money?” Oxford Econ. Papers, 297–322.
17.
Pennsylvania State University. (1982). “Effects of solid waste disposal sites on community development and residential property values.” Inst. for Research on Land and Water Resources.” Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
18.
Pettit, C., and Johnson, C. (1987). “The impact on property values of solid waste facilities.” Waste Age, Apr., 1987, 97–104.
19.
Price, J. (1987). “The impact of solid waste management facilities on surrounding real estate values.” Proc. of the 25th Annual International GRCDA, Seminar, Equipment, Services and Systems Show, Saint Paul, Minn.
20.
Salem‐Multiple Listings Bureau, Ltd. (1982–1986). Quarterly books, Salem MLS‐Bureau, Ltd., Salem, Oreg.
21.
Schmalensee, R. et al. (1975). “Measuring external effects of solid waste management.” Report R 801673, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
22.
SPSS Inc. (1986). User's Guide. 2 Ed. SPSS Inc., Chicago Ill.
23.
Slovic, P., et al. (1985). “Characterizing perceived risks.” Perilous Progress—Managing of Hazards of Technology, G. Hohenemser and R. Yates, eds., Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
24.
Stern, R. (1977). “Locational parameters for nuisance land uses: Establishing sanitary landfills in the urban setting,” thesis presented to Northeastern Illinois University, at Chicago, Ill., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
25.
Tacoma‐Pierce County Board of Realtors. (1983–1986). Quarterly books, Tacoma‐Pierce County Board of Realtors, Tacoma, Wash.
26.
Tacoma Real Estate Trends. (1986). Tacoma Real Estate Research Committe, XI(2), Tacoma, Wash.
27.
Tchobanoglous, G., et al. (1979). Solid wastes. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
28.
“Resource Recovery Review.” (1985). Waste Age, Nov.
29.
Zeiss, C. (1984a). “The financial and social costs of waste disposal,” thesis presented to the University of British Columbia, at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
30.
Zeiss, C. (1984b). “Social cost assessment of the proposed waste disposal facilities,” Lower Mainland Refuse Project of British Columbia, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.
31.
Zeiss, C., and Atwater, J. (1987). “Waste facilities in residential communities: Impacts and acceptance.” J. Urban Plng. and Dev., 113(1), 19–34.
32.
Zeiss, C. (1988). “Siting waste disposal facilities: Impacts and acceptance,” thesis presented to the University of British Columbia, at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 115 • Issue 2 • September 1989
Pages: 64 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1989
Published in print: Sep 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.