Estimating Safety Benefits of Road Improvements: Case Based Approach
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 4
Abstract
Improvements to road safety have become a high priority for road authorities due to increasing public awareness and concern of the high social and economic costs of collisions. However, satisfying this priority in an environment of limited budgets and growing fiscal constraints is difficult. It is therefore important to ensure that the funding available for road safety improvements is efficiently utilized. In an attempt to maximize the overall road safety benefits, safety professionals usually invoke a process to evaluate the cost effectiveness of road safety projects. Road safety benefits are normally determined using collision reduction factors (CRFs) that are reported in the road safety literature. However, the results from many previous safety studies are unreliable due to the inability to apply the CRFs to all conditions and because many safety studies suffer from problems with the evaluation methodology and accommodating the random nature of collisions. To resolve these problems, safety analysis software known as the information system for estimating crash reductions (ISECR) has been developed. Information system for estimating crash reductions is an intelligent database that uses a case-based reasoning approach to compile the results from previous road safety research. Information system for estimating crash reductions evaluates the applicability of the results by accounting for site-specific characteristics and the study methodology by assigning a quality score. The system determines the expected CRFs and the range and reliability associated with a safety improvement at a specific location. The evolution of ISECR, a description of current and future enhancements, and the applications for this road safety-engineering tool are the subjects of this paper.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bury, K. V. (1999). Statistical distributions in engineering, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Capus, L., and Tourigny, N. (1998). “Road safety analysis: a case-based reasoning approach.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 77th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
Creasey, T., and Agent, K. R. (1985). “Development of accident reduction factors.” Research Rep. No. UKTRP-85-6, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Federal Highway Administration, Lexington, Ky.
Elvik, R. (1995). “Meta-analysis of evaluations of public lighting as accident countermeasure.” Transportation Research Record 1485, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 112–123.
Elvik, R.(1996). “Evaluations of road accident blackspot treatment: a case of the iron law of evaluation studies?” Accid. Anal Prev., 28(6), 685–694.
Hauer, E.(1992). “Empirical Bayes approach to the estimation of “unsafety”: the multivariate regression method.” Accid. Anal Prev., 24(5), 457–477.
Khattak, A., and Kanafani, A.(1996). “Case-based reasoning: a planning tool for intelligent transportation systems.” Transp. Res., Part C: Emerg. Technol., 4(5), 267–288.
Khattak, A., and Renski, H. (1999). “Plan HOV: a case-based reasoning planning tool for high-occupancy-vehicle lane analysis in a GIS environment.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 78th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, Inc., San Francisco.
Lin, F. C., and Sayed, T. (1999). “Pre-implementation evaluation of safety improvement programs.” Univ. of British Columbia Rep. Prepared for the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, ICBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
McFarland, W. F., Griffin, L. I., Rollins, J. B., Stockton, W. R., Phillips, D. T., and Dudek, C. L. (1978). “Assessment of techniques for cost-effective of highway accident countermeasures.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-79-53, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Pu, P., and Maher, M. (1998). Issues and applications of case-based reasoning in design, Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J.
Sayed, T., and Rodriguez, F. (1999). “Accident prediction models for urban unsignalized intersections in British Columbia.” Transportation Research Record 1665, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 93–99.
Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Tamburri, T. N., and Smith, R. N. (1971). “The safety index: a method of evaluating and rating safety benefits.” Highway Research Record 332, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 28–43.
Terry, D. A., and Watson, J. E. (1982). “Post-implementation evaluation system methodology and output.” Traffic and Safety Division, New York State Department of Transportation.
Watson, I. (1997). Applying case-based reasoning: techniques for enterprise systems, Morgan Kaufmann Inc., San Francisco.
Yeh, I. C.(1997). “Case-based approaches for preliminary design of steel building frames.” Microcomput. Civ. Eng., 12, 327–337.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 129 • Issue 4 • July 2003
Pages: 385 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 24, 2001
Accepted: Aug 8, 2002
Published online: Jun 13, 2003
Published in print: Jul 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.