TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 15, 2002

Optimal Configuration of Airport Passenger Buildings for Travelers

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper uses a novel analysis to define the optimal configuration of airport passenger buildings for travelers. The approach explicitly recognizes two significant practical facts omitted in previous work—(1) the importance of transfer passengers, who may comprise 50% or more of the travelers; and (2) the way airlines intelligently position aircraft at gates to minimize the walking distances between connecting flights. The analysis breaks the issue of finding the walking distances of travelers into two parts. The “impedance” matrix defines the distance or level of difficulty in transiting between gates and results from architectural considerations. The “flow” matrix defines the number of passengers going between gates. Multiplication of these matrices results in a “passenger-impedance” matrix that defines the distribution of walking distances or travel time for travelers. Comparison of these distributions shows the relative advantage of different configurations. Results suggest that from the perspective of the travelers, intelligently managed linear midfield concourses generally provide the best overall configuration for significant airport passenger buildings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Air Transportation Association of America and R. M. Parsons Co. (1973). “The apron-terminal complex—Analysis of concepts for evaluation of terminal buildings.” U.S. National Technical Information Service, AD 771, 186/4GI, Springfield, Va.
Bandara, S. (1989). “Airport terminals optimal configurations.” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada.
Bandara, S., and Wirasinghe, S. C.(1992). “Walking distance minimization for airport terminal configurations.” Transp. Res., Part A, 22(1), 59–74.
Blow, C. (1991). Airport terminals, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.
De Barros, A. (2001). “Planning of airports for the new large aircraft.” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada.
de Neufville, R. (1976). “Chapter 6: Designing the Terminal.” Airport systems planning: A critical look at the methods and experience, Macmillan, London and MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
de Neufville, R.(1995). “Designing airport passenger buildings for the 21st. century.” Transp. J., 111, 83–96.
de Neufville, R. (1996). “Optimal configuration of complexes of large airport passenger buildings and their internal transport systems.” Proc., Airports of the Future, International Symposium, Académie Nationale de l’Air et de l’Espace, Cépaduès Editions, Paris, 342–352.
de Neufville, R., and Odoni, A. (2002). Airport systems: Planning, design and management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
de Neufville, R., and Rusconi-Clerici, I.(1978). “Designing airport terminals for transfer passengers.” Transp. Eng. J. 104(6), 775–787.
Hart, W. (1985). The airport passenger terminal, Wiley, New York.
McKelvey, F. X. (1989). A review of airport terminal system simulation models. Transportation Systems Center, U.S. DOT, Cambridge, Mass.
Mumayiz, S. (1991). “Interactive airport landside simulation: An object oriented approach.” Transp. Res. Board Record 1296, 13–22.
Mumayiz, S. (ed). (1998). “Airport modeling and simulation.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Airport Modeling and Simulation, ASCE, Reston, VA.
O&D plus database. (2000). Database Product Inc., Dallas.
Odoni, A., and de Neufville, R.(1992). “Passenger terminal design.” Transp. Res., Part A, 26(1), 27–35.
Robusté, F.(1991). “Centralized Hub-Terminal Geometric Concepts. I: Walking distance.” Transp. Eng. J., 117(2), 143–158.
Robusté, F., and Daganzo, C.(1991). “Centralized hub-terminal geometric Concepts. II: Baggage and extensions.” Transp. Eng. J., 117(2), 159–177.
Solomon Smith Barney. (2000). Hub Factbook, New York.
Svrcek, T. (1992). “Policy level decision support for airport passenger terminal design.” Transportation Research Record 1379, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 17–25.
Svrcek, T. (1994). “Planning level decision support for the selection of robust configurations of airport passenger buildings.” PhD dissertation, Center for Transportation Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
DOT. (2000). T100 databases user’s manual, Washington, D.C.
Wirasinghe, S. C., Bandara, S., and Vandebona, U. (1987). “Airport terminal geometries for minimal walking distances.” Transportation and traffic theory, N. Gartner and N. Wilson, eds., Elsevier Science, New York, 483–502.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 128Issue 3May 2002
Pages: 211 - 217

History

Received: Feb 6, 2001
Accepted: May 29, 2001
Published online: Apr 15, 2002
Published in print: May 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Richard de Neufville, M.ASCE
Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room E-40-245, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 02139.
Alexandre G. de Barros
Intermediate Airport Systems Analyst, ArupNAPA St. 1606, 365 Bloor St. East, Toronto, ON, Canada M4W 3L4.
Steven C. Belin, A.M.ASCE
Senior Analyst, Simat, Helliesen & Eichner, Inc., 1 Main St., Cambridge, MA. 02142.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share